Griff Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Hamhuis. The best from him is yet to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Hamhuis > Mitchell > Ballard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aegis1984 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 My vote goes to the guy who just signed my Dan Hamhuis jersey tonight at the PG Cougars Alumni golf tournament. Just sayin'. BTW, it wasn't Willie Mitchell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai604 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Hamhuis, for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckchuck Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 lets not forget the HUGE hit willie had on toews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Stupid question guys. Dan Hamhius easily. It's not like if we had Willie MItchell - Hamhius we would have improved. Hamhius is one of our best dmans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Honestly, I'm a huge Bieksa fan but he is like Phaneuf, all the flash but he isn't as good as people think, he has an amazing skillset but he turns the puck over just as much if not more than Ballard, he's great sometimes and terrible others. consistency is an issue for him. And your right that both Juice and Hammer helped each other but I think Hamhuis would have had more success with someone else than Bieksa would have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exarch Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I'm not nearly as surprised when Hamhuis scores as I was when Willie did.. so Hamhuis, give they are both excellent defensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10Bure14Burrows Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Stupid question guys. Dan Hamhius easily. It's not like if we had Willie MItchell - Hamhius we would have improved. Hamhius is one of our best dmans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Oh yeah, you sound like a 'huge' Bieksa fan. He has an 'amazing skillset' , but he isn't as good as people think?? How does that even make sense? Bieksa played a stint with Edler last season, and it was Hamhuis who struggled with consistency. Bieksa also played against the top players of the other team night in and night out...comparing his stats to Ballard's is ridiculous on so many levels, but mainly because Ballard only played half a season on 3rd pairing minutes most nights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinitecarnage Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Ohlund > Hamhuis > Salo > Mitchell............................................................................................................ > Bieksa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.