CanuckClown Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Deal with my pain. So let me get this straight - you have 9 posts and have just joined CDC. You analyse me and say I'm patronizing - then when I ask you how you would handle it, you say "One should be able to have a discussion without needing to psycho analyse others." Yeah...but...you just did that... In other words...maybe you should take your own advice or at the very least get to see what is really going on here before chirping in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Umm, is this response for real?!? I didn't psycho analyse you - I stated that the nature of your post was patronizing. Is the difference not obvious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Deal with my pain. So let me get this straight - you have 9 posts and have just joined CDC. You analyse me and say I'm patronizing - then when I ask you how you would handle it, you say "One should be able to have a discussion without needing to psycho analyse others." Yeah...but...you just did that... In other words...maybe you should take your own advice or at the very least get to see what is really going on here before chirping in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 What does his post count or the date he joined this Board have to do with his ability to recognize a patronizing post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Nothing. Nothing at all. Why do you ask? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Because you brought it up in your reply to him. Seriously, are you really this obtuse in your daily life? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 I didn't say his post had anything to do with patronizing. Seriously, are you really this obtuse in your daily life? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 I didn't suggest that you did....I asked you what his post count and date joined had to do with his ability to recognize your post as patronizing . I realize you lost your marbles long ago, but now it just looks like you've even abandoned your search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Edit: And I fell for you getting my goat once again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Don't know how I goaded you by asking you a question. If you're so easily goadable perhaps you should actually take the previous poster's advice and avoid internet forums. And are you trying to play the victim again?? No, because what does his post count and the date he joined have to do with pointing out to you, that in his opinion, one should be able to have a discussion without psycho analyzing in the patronizing way in which you did? Again, why did you bring his post count and join date into the spotlight of your response to him? It's just a simple question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Why do you want to know? What does it have to do with you? Seriously, I have know idea why you are here (other than to provoke me). Edit: Can we get back on topic now please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 You two both fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Sikes Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 I'm saying you threw an emo hissy fit, like a teenage at her sweet 16 party who soiled her dress. I didn't create this thread and I didn't participate till more recently in the thread, and in doing so didn't even address the mindless meanderings offered by Heretic. He addressed me first, if you'll recall. I addressed another poster. But, I suppose those things don't fit your narrative, do they? You may have a sense of humour but you apparently left it in your other purse upon reading a movie quote, which led to your Veruca Salt-esque screed as a response. I get dry dark humour, half my family are English who oft tell their jokes with stiff upper lips and nary a half grin. If you want to redefine humourless into dry, dark and subtle, you may want to let the good people over at Merriam-Webster know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Now if this isn't a deliberate attempt to provoke me, what is? Sorry Sharp, but I ain't taking the bait, but feel free to dig that hole you've made for yourself as deep as you can, if you were half as smart as you think you are you'd realize that all you are doing with each post is reinforcing the points I made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 If free will was an illusion humanity would be no different than the beaver that builds the dam. We would mindlessly, or instinctively, go about our business without a personal thought. Of course, we both know this to be false. People use their cognitive abilities every waking minute of every day. It is true, people's decisions are "guided" by macro, or structural, conditions. It is within this context that the battle for agency should be fought. Alas, there are those who accept their fate; treating these structural conditions as innate and sanctioned by "G"od. Hence, religion is the opiate for the masses and should be rejected. But as I alluded to in another post, the rise of Atheism has nothing to do with recapturing the masses agency. I would argue that consumption - Iphones, shiny cars, diesel jeans and so on - has replaced religion as our opiate. I digress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Sikes Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 And your emo rant wasn't 'provocative'?? Allow me to refresh your hypocritical memory: Provocatively provoking, no? What's PIA? I was curious. I always like to know the meaning of insults hurled my way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eh! Team Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 We are God. If we didn't exist then there would be no purpose for God to exist. This is why we cannot see beyond ourselves. Think about it. Religions only true purpose is to divide us. People just got to start believing in themselves and each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 We are God. If we didn't exist then there would be no purpose for God to exist. This is why we cannot see beyond ourselves. Think about it. Religions only true purpose is to divide us. People just got to start believing in themselves and each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 You want to get into it with me when you can't even figure that one out? You better start in the boys department and work your way up to the mens floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.