MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Proposal Mission 1.1 - dral - disapprove Link to comment
Dral Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 "I told you so" is coming, don't worry Link to comment
Krazz Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 With a resounding majority, Proposal 1.1 of: MikeyBoy44 Dral JohnLocke has been chosen to take part in the destruction of the Imperial Depot on the outskirts of town. Voting Pattern 1.1 --- Call to arms! MikeyBoy44, Dral, JohnLocke, please send in either your Support or Sabotage vote via PM. Note: Remember, you only get one choice if you're with the Resistance, and that's to support the mission. If you're one of those filt- I mean, cunning Spies, you may submit either choice. Note: For flavour, you may provide in the same PM what you will be doing in the mission, whether it's to drive the get-away vehicle, plant the bomb, etc. I'll leave it to your imagination, and I'll see what I can poop out during the Reveal. Good hunting, Operatives. Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 So far it's the mafia crew and a pineapple. We will have the advantage since we already can get a bit of a read on each other Or maybe that gives me the advantage. None of you have a read on me I believe we try to figure out who's the spy. We need our missions to pass so we can weed out the bad guys. So it sounds like if we go in with the team I chose and the mission passes I think it basically clears us. If it fails we have to figure out who sabotaged it. First mission seems like its a crap shoot a lot like mafia. I would say we spend some time taking note of accepts and denies. Yes, we need to all work together to figure out who the spies are. Even if first mission is a success, that means nothing. I've played plenty of games where the spies allow the first one to succeed. Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Didn't know we were starting already, otherwise I'd have voted. If this mission fails, I blame all of you. Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 If the mission fails I can only blame Dral or JL. My first guess is Dral due to his out of place vote which im sure he wanted to look like doing a good deed. Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 If the mission fails I can only blame Dral or JL. My first guess is Dral due to his out of place vote which im sure he wanted to look like doing a good deed. Pointing fingers already, seems very spy-like to me! Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Pointing fingers already, seems very spy-like to me! I probably would have let the disapproval go if it followed an explanation. However just a warning of an I told you so coming is fishy as hell. Link to comment
Dral Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 So just to be clear... if we DIDN"T recieve a PM, we should be voting to make sure it's a success? Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 If you didnt receive an email you have no choice but to choose success. Its the spies who have the option. Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 You make me hate myself for chosing you..... Link to comment
Dral Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 You make me hate myself for chosing you..... Why? I have no choice but to vote for success I have a sneaky feeling you're going to sabotage the mission and blame it on me with a "I tried to pick people I thought would help" excuse Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Why? I have no choice but to vote for success I have a sneaky feeling you're going to sabotage the mission and blame it on me with a "I tried to pick people I thought would help" excuse My picks we obviously a crap shot. But your posts are very discerning. Lets start this over. Why did you choose disapprove? Link to comment
Dral Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 My picks we obviously a crap shot. But your posts are very discerning. Lets start this over. Why did you choose disapprove? I generally have a disapproving nature Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I generally have a disapproving nature Oh boy. Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Perhaps both of you are spies and this is all just an act... Link to comment
Dral Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Perhaps both of you are spies and this is all just an act... Maybe you and JL are spies and when it fails you two will try to convince everyone it was our fault. Link to comment
Beluga Whale Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 If Mikeyboy is a spy and wants to fail the mission there's no way he put another spy on the team. I'm thinking the first mission will probably go through regardless of whether or not one of JL, MK44 or Dral is a spy. Each mission gets more members as the game progresses so failing the first one, where only 3 get to go, would pretty much guarantee you will not get to go on another right? Link to comment
Krazz Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 The plan was foolproof. The demolitions expert of the group built the bomb to do exactly what needed to be done. The best operative snuck into the Depot, planted the bomb right by the propane tanks, just as planned. But... the bomb never went off. Sabotage! Did Dral build a dud, while he was drunkenly fornicating as he was working on the bomb? Or was it MikeyBoy44, who bear-hugged the bomb to the destination while muttering nothings about rainbows and unicorns? Did JohnLocke signal for assistance to his buddies in the Empire while he was waiting behind in the getaway? Regardless, the mission has FAILED. otherwise is our new Mission Leader. Perhaps he can do better? We are on Proposal Mission 2.1, which requires 4 members. Good hunting, Operatives. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.