ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 17 minutes ago, Toews said: Is there a reason why you are going with option 2 for all teams? Don't teams have a choice on which option to pick? The only reason to go for option 2 is if your #4 defenseman is more valuable than your #5 forward. Very few teams have that problem. I would add Montour to Anaheim but with Andersen being the best goalie to remain unprotected in the entire league, no point considering other options. It would just be to hard and take too much time to determine which option teams would want. Option 2 keeps it simple. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 1 hour ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: For the Central.... DAL – Seguin, Benn, Nuchushkin, Faksa, Sharp, Klingberg, Honka, Goligoski Lehtonen Unprotected – Spezza, Oduya, Niemi, Hemsky, Russell CHI – Kane, Toews, Panarin, Teravanin, Anisimov, Seabrook, Keith, Hjalmarsson, Crawford Unprotected – Ladd, Hossa, Kruger, Shaw, Bickell STL – Tarasenko, Stastny Steen, Lehtera, Fabbri, Pietrangelo, Shattenkirk, Parayko, Allen Unprotected – Backes, Bouwmeester, Elliot, Berglund, Brouwer, Gunnarsson NSH – Weber, Josi, Johansen, Neal, Forsberg, Smith, Ellis, Fiala, Rinne Unprotected – Ekholm, Fisher, Ribeiro, Wilson COL – Duchene, Landeskog, MacKinnon, Boedker, Johnson, Barrie, Soderberg, Beauchemin Varlamov Unprotected – Iginla, Mitchell, Grigorenko MIN – Parise, Koivu, Granlund, Coyle, Spurgeon, Brodin, Dumba, Niederrieter, Dubnyk Unprotected – Vanek, Pominville, Fontaine, Zucker, Scandella, Kuemper, Suter WPG – Wheeler, Ehlers, Scheifele, Little, Myers, Byfuglien, Trouba, Morrisey, Hellebuyck Unprotected – Pavelec, Enstrom, Stafford, Armia, Petan Found more targets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Shouldn't we name the team first? Personally, I like the Nevada Nymphos.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 13 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: It would just be to hard and take too much time to determine which option teams would want. Option 2 keeps it simple. . IMO Option 1 would have been a better choice as I think that one will be chosen by just about every team but I digress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Missing Dal Lindell Minny Reilly @ForsbergTheGreat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 1 hour ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: For the Central.... WPG – Wheeler, Ehlers, Scheifele, Little, Myers, Byfuglien, Trouba, Morrisey, Hellebuyck Unprotected – Pavelec, Enstrom, Stafford, Armia, Petan Agree? Disagree? Am I missing anyone? As usual, will comment on the Jets. According to the rules, players entering the final year of their ELC doesn't begin until July 1st. In that regard, both Ehlers and Petan would not have to be protected, as they would be ineligible. In Ehlers place, they would probably place Adam Lowry as a protected asset. And depending on if they won the lottery, they would probably look at trading Bryan Little (may happen anyway) and then use the other one on Marko Dano. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 6 minutes ago, Monty said: As usual, will comment on the Jets. According to the rules, players entering the final year of their ELC doesn't begin until July 1st. In that regard, both Ehlers and Petan would not have to be protected, as they would be ineligible. In Ehlers place, they would probably place Adam Lowry as a protected asset. And depending on if they won the lottery, they would probably look at trading Bryan Little (may happen anyway) and then use the other one on Marko Dano. Yeah there is a lot of grey area in terms of ELC, and NMC, so to simplify it I just used any player that has played under 2 season pro is exempt, any player over has to be protect. I also imagine a lot of teams will make trades to better protect themselves prior to the draft but it's hard to predict what will happen. Did i pick the correct goalie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 1 hour ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: For the Metro.... WSH- Ovi, Backstrom, Kuznetsov, Carlson, Wilson, Galiev, Oshie, Niskanen, Holtby Unprotected – Orpik, Orlov, Johansson, Burakovsky, Laata, Bowey NYR – Stepan, Kreider, McDonagh, Miller, Nash, Lindberg, Staal, Girardi, Lundqvist Unprotected – Boyle, Fast, Hayes, Moore, Yandle, Brassard NYI –Tavares, Strome, Boychuk, Leddy, Hamonic, De Haan, Okposo, Lee, Halak Unprotected –Bailey, Pulock, Grabovski, Kulemin, Nielson, Nelson PIT – Malkin, Crosby, Kessel, Letang, Maatta, Bennett, Pouliot, Hornqvist Fleury Unprotected –Kunitz, Bonino, Hagelin, Fehr PHI –Giroux, Voracek, Simmonds, Schenn, Couturier, Gostisbehere, MacDonald, Read Mason Unprotected – Raffle, Laughton, Medvedev, Streit, Umberger CAR – Staal, Skinner, Lindholm Faulk, Hanfin, Murphy, Unprotected – Nash, Haisney, NJ – Henrique, Cammalleri, Zajac, Greene, Severson Larsson, Josefson, Palmieri, Schneider Unprotected –Ruutu, Gionta, Smith-Pelly, Tootoo CBJ – Jones, Murray, Saad, Dubinky, Folingo, Johnson, Savard, Jenner Bobrovsky Unprotected – Atknison, Hartnell, Wennberg, Tyutin, Clarkson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 21 minutes ago, Toews said: IMO Option 1 would have been a better choice as I think that one will be chosen by just about every team but I digress. You're probably right, there just to many grey area's we don't have clarity on, College rules, europe rules, teams will need to keep open 25% of their cap, ELC rules, and NMC. This biggest issues will be ELC and NMC's. So I went with as simple as possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Missing NYR Buchnevich Pitts might protect Murray over Fluery Carolinia Rask Columbus Rychel @ForsbergTheGreat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 14 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: Yeah there is a lot of grey area in terms of ELC, and NMC, so to simplify it I just used any player that has played under 2 season pro is exempt, any player over has to be protect. I also imagine a lot of teams will make trades to better protect themselves prior to the draft but it's hard to predict what will happen. Did i pick the correct goalie? You definitely did. Fortunately, Eric Comrie would not be eligible, so he would not need to be protected. And Pavelec will be coming off his contract, so they can make him unprotected, all the while he'll be headed to free agency (unless the players have to be signed for another year. Then they will extend Hutchinson in order to make it work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 24 minutes ago, Gstank29 said: Missing NYR Buchnevich Pitts might protect Murray over Fluery Carolinia Rask Columbus Rychel @ForsbergTheGreat I know rangers are high on Buchnevich, think they would rather keep him and risk not protecting a staal or Nash, they would save cap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 2 hours ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: For the Atlantic... FLA – Barkov, Ekblad, Gudbransson, Bjugstad, Smith, Petrovic, Huberdeau, Trocheck, Luongo Unprotected – Jagr, Jokinen, Hudler, Howden, Kulikov BOS – Krejci, Bergeron Krug, Marchand, Beleskey, Hates, Seidenberg, Pastrnak, Rask Unprotected – Kelly, Eriksson, Spooner, Chara, McQuaid, Subban TB – Stamkos, Kucherov, Palat, Drouin, Johnson, Callahan, Hedman, Namestnikov, Vasilevskiy Unprotected –Bishop, Garrison, Coburn, Carle Boyle, Filppula, DET – Nyquist, Tatar, Helm, Larkin, Jurco, Kronwall, Ericsson, Smith, Mrazek Unprotected –Richards, Zetterberg, Datyuk, Abdelkader, Green, Howard OTT – Turris, Ryan, Karlsson, Stone, Wiercioch, Ceci, Zibanejad, Lazar Anderson Unprotected – Hoffman, Smith, Chaisson, Phaneuf, Methot MTL – Subban, Galchenyak, Pacioretty, Plakanc, Emelin, Gallagher, Desharnais, Price Unprotected – Markov, Petry, Gilbert, Eller, McCarron, Beaulieu, Condon BUF – Eichel, Rienhart, O’rielly, Kane, Girgensons, Bogosian Ristolinen, Ennis, Lehner Unprotected – Moulson, Gionta, Foligno, Franson, Pysyk TOR – Nylander, Kadri, JVR, Rielly, Gardiner, Carrick, Komarov, Bozak, Bernier Unprotected –Lupul, Holland, Grabner, Parenteau, Michalek, Robidas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 @thejazz97 Your team...lots of really good D Forwards Hossa Brassard Yakupov Backes Kesler Gaborik Johansson Nielson Abdelkader Wennberg Defense Suter, Enstrom, Wideman, Ekholm Franson, Oduya , Methot, Kulikov, Streit, , Petry Goalies Reimer Subban Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 3 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: @thejazz97 Your team...lots of really good D Forwards Hossa Brassard Yakupov Backes Kesler Gaborik Johansson Nielson Abdelkader Wennberg Defense Suter, Enstrom, Wideman, Ekholm Franson, Oduya , Methot, Kulikov, Streit, , Petry Goalies Reimer Subban I think in trying to make sure I had enough D I overcompensated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 2 hours ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: For the Central.... CHI – Kane, Toews, Panarin, Teravanin, Anisimov, Seabrook, Keith, Hjalmarsson, Crawford Unprotected – Ladd, Hossa, Kruger, Shaw, Bickell Panarin wouldn't qualify to be protected. Would be finishing his second year in the NHL, and not July 1st, so they wouldn't have to worry about him. Would protect one of Kruger or Shaw in his place. Hossa would be a prime candidate to be picked up. His salary would help the new team reach the cap floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 14 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: @thejazz97 Your team...lots of really good D Forwards Hossa Brassard Yakupov Backes Kesler Gaborik Johansson Nielsen Abdelkader Hagelin Wennberg Eller Michalek Smith-Pelly Defense Suter, Enstrom, Wideman, Ekholm Franson, Oduya , Bowey Methot, Kulikov, Streit, , Petry Goalies Reimer Subban Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Andersen Edler Wideman Yapukov King (you forgot him on LA) Rieder Thornton Suter Stafford Lindell Ladd Backes Bowey Nelson Laughton Atkinson (I think he will be protected) Erickson Dats Hoffman Petry Folgino So Ladd-Thornton-Ericksson Hoffman-Backes-Atkinson Nelson-Dats-Yapukov King-Laughton-Folgino Sutter-Wideman Edler-Lindell Petry-Bowey Andersen Matt Murray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 6 minutes ago, Monty said: Panarin wouldn't qualify to be protected. Would be finishing his second year in the NHL, and not July 1st, so they wouldn't have to worry about him. Would protect one of Kruger or Shaw in his place. Hossa would be a prime candidate to be picked up. His salary would help the new team reach the cap floor. He did play pro in the khl and the rules state 2 years pro including Europe. But they still have to iron out the details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 24 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: I know rangers are high on Buchnevich, think they would rather keep him and risk not protecting a staal or Nash, they would save cap? I doubt European experience will count. It would just make things complicated, more than they already are. As far as Rangers protecting Staal, I doubt it happens. His contract is absolutely brutal. Him getting claimed would actually benefit the Rangers long term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.