Caboose Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 would be way more for that,I'd say Luo for Schenn , Armstrong and 3 first round picks,least 2 firsts.I think TBL would be a better deal luo,raymond,ballard and schroder for malone,hedman and a young goalie for the minors or a 1st round pick this year from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Francis says to strike Panthers off list of possible destinations for Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlas=d Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Luongo for Seabrook Edler-Seabrook Hamhuis-Bieksa Ballard-Tanev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 The return for Luongo will include a 1st round pick, a high end young player/prospect and another player coming back. Luongo is worth more than Schenn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Chicago and Toronto? Lu totally knows gillis won't trade him there. He obviously wants to go back to flOrida or tamPa. Close to home. Honestly. Lu on te hals would be a nightmare for the Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.K. Chesterton Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 I think that based on Burke's woeful drafting record, he might be willing to part with the #5. But it would be a tricky trade to work out. I am fairly confident that Luongo will wind up in Tampa Bay. I think it makes the most sense. He won't have all the media attention, he'll be closer to his family and Tampa Bay has a promising team with the likes of Stamkos and Hedman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Tanev in my opinion is less of a liability then Schenn , so schenn is Only a minor piece but NOT a uprgrade/fix IN any category but depth I would love to see how he plays under some canucks training and in our system but hes not what we "need" we need somewhat close to a guarantee If gillis wants to trade luongo for schenn good hes a another young piece possibly who has just caught a stroke of playing in the wrong town (example grabner). This is Cory's time now im not expecting a high return but i am expecting come trade deadline next year we have a shake up on d Gillis has tried almost everything but a top d-man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stryker709 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 One team not really mentioned is San Jose...I wonder if he'd be good fit there. They are a competitive team, only year off being conference finalists. Seems to me they could use an upgrade over Niemi. I don't think Luongo could fetch a top end prospect put a roster player of similar value would be possible. TO VAN: Havlat TO SJ: Luongo D.Sedin H.Sedin Burrows Booth Kesler Havlat Higgins Lapierre Kassian Weise Malhotra Hansen Not bad.....Havlat has a similar contract at roughly 5mil/per. Canucks have been hurting for offense the last 2 playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Really? Havlat's groin is made of glass! He has broken it more times than anyone in any sport on the entire planet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Whatever team gets luongo is getting a early christmas/retirement present **** Best goalie to wear our uni, went to scf in past 2 years gold medal winner and amazing regular season numbers. If Tb or Toronto lands luongo they will be in the playoffs for the next 4 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stryker709 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 I think a team will overpay for him. We don't need to trade him. We could keep him if we had to. His cap hit and contract are not as bad as people make them out to be. There are however teams out there that simply can not compete without getting an elite goalie. I really think we will be getting much more in return than most people think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87Crosby Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 We do a 30 way trade and get Stamkos and Hedman in 7 diferent trades and give up luongo, rome, alberts, and reinprect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 reign of luongo has come to an end.....goodbye luongo........ ill forever be a canucks fan......... but luongo has inspired me in the last few years that........ to whichever team he goes...ill follow him and cheer for that team as long as he's active there...... LUUUUUUUU <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 maybe i'm the only one but this just seems like the wrong thing here. Luongo has done tons for this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannucker Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 how can anyone think Luo is going to the hawks, GMMG would never do it. Its the HAWKS, if Luo goes there you might aswell hand them the stanley cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 2 thumbs down for Gardiner. Some Canucks fans are really clueless about other players outside our organization. I also call James Duthie bluff on LUongo chosing Toronto. Why the hell would he chose Toronto? Chose a city with even more pressure to perform? Also why the hell is he chosing such a garbage team? James Duthie have no source on who he might actually chose. He just made it up, to in hopes to get followers from Toronto. It's pure B.S. Toronto happens to be a team that needs goaltending badly, I honestly doubt Luongo will want to go to Toronto. If you ask me, he probably ask for a place like Detroit. For a team to get eliminated in round 1 in 5 games, they might be looking into getting a goalie too! How bout Columbus? But I call B.S on Duthie naming Toronto. There's absolutley nobody I want from Toronto, The only way they can do it , is give us a package, but the package is a combination of a bunch of players I don't want, so it sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talon9 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Chicago? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrindTIMEr Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Shut down defencemen plz and thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hockey pundits seem to think the Canucks would have to take on a bad contract to move Luongo for young talent. Tampa Mattias Ohlund Ryan Malone? Chicago ? Florida (FLA won't want Luongo though) Upshall Jovo Toronto Komisarek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pomorick Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Louongo and Ballard for Ohlund and Hedman. A trade both sides would see as a no, but maybe... Tampa gets a solid netminder and a solid defenseman who they have first hand knowlege of as he played on Florida. Canucks get an unproven young defenseman with a huge potential upside and Ohlund who while probably not a viable top defender anymore would fit in the locker room and could fill the 7th or 8th defenseman roll shared with Sami Salo. Tampa instantly become favorites in the east and we look better now and in the future. A deal like this would probably involve draft picks as well depending on how well Gillis and Yzerman play poker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.