You're saying that like it wouldn't take Higgins to get Nash.
I know Higgins is good he's the only winger asset we have that we can part with.
Sammuellson, and Raymond evaporating has left us dry.
I'm saying that like it is crazy to consider giving up that much for an underachieving, overpaid guy on a team that needs to make changes. The Blue Jackets are in no position to try to command anything like that from the Canucks.
Luongo, Higgins, a 1st and a prospect blueliner for Nash? Never.
Luongo alone is the only way I would consider taking Nash. Anything in addition is salary for picks/prospects.
This nonsense about giving away a handful of assets is silly - on one hand people devalue Luongo (wrongly) based on the term of his contract (which is misleading) and yet they inflate Nash despite an actual albatross contract. Not worth it.
Higgins is the only winger we can part with? You'll have to explain that one - it makes no sense to me.
Edited by oldnews, 16 June 2012 - 03:53 PM.