Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

New Official NHL 13 Thread


  • Please log in to reply
1493 replies to this topic

#931 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 64,527 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:07 PM

Just got Selanne for 1000 pucks!
  • 0
Posted Image

#932 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:54 PM

and Gumball, I know, I can never come close to finishing a BAGM cuz I'm always restarting cuz of the updates lol.


I know right? Me too! :P
  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#933 Lonny_Bohonos_14

Lonny_Bohonos_14

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,924 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 09

Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:21 AM

Whenever a new roster comes out, first thing I do is knock down the Leafs a bit. Not a lot, and I don't hate on all of them. Just guys like Phaneuf(88-85), Liles(84-81), Komisarek(78-76) and Franson(potential decrease).

I always hate how the Leafs are one of the best teams just because so many of they're player are overrated in the game.

Another peeve of mine is in BAGM. I was rebuilding the Stars, and the owner says "I know we need to take the long term approach to success. I don't expect you to make the playoffs, but will be pleasantly surprised if you do." but then expects 39 wins? That's 78 points, and just outside of a playoff spot. What kind of long term approach is that? I'm not trying to build the Flames here lol.

Either way, he wasn't happy with my 30 wins, and now expects me to make the playoffs in year 2, with almost no roster upgrades..
  • 0

Posted Image

Credit to -Vintage Canuck-


#934 Squeak

Squeak

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,134 posts
  • Joined: 21-April 03

Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:16 PM

Whenever a new roster comes out, first thing I do is knock down the Leafs a bit. Not a lot, and I don't hate on all of them. Just guys like Phaneuf(88-85), Liles(84-81), Komisarek(78-76) and Franson(potential decrease).

I always hate how the Leafs are one of the best teams just because so many of they're player are overrated in the game.

Another peeve of mine is in BAGM. I was rebuilding the Stars, and the owner says "I know we need to take the long term approach to success. I don't expect you to make the playoffs, but will be pleasantly surprised if you do." but then expects 39 wins? That's 78 points, and just outside of a playoff spot. What kind of long term approach is that? I'm not trying to build the Flames here lol.

Either way, he wasn't happy with my 30 wins, and now expects me to make the playoffs in year 2, with almost no roster upgrades..


78 points is not just outside of the playoffs.

78 points = 3rd worst last year (Montreal)
  • 0
Posted Image

#935 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:22 PM

Another peeve of mine is in BAGM. I was rebuilding the Stars, and the owner says "I know we need to take the long term approach to success. I don't expect you to make the playoffs, but will be pleasantly surprised if you do." but then expects 39 wins? That's 78 points, and just outside of a playoff spot. What kind of long term approach is that? I'm not trying to build the Flames here lol.

Either way, he wasn't happy with my 30 wins, and now expects me to make the playoffs in year 2, with almost no roster upgrades..


All the AI in this game is dumber than s***. I just turn GM firing off when I start a new BAGM for that very reason, thier expectations always just to "make the playoffs" in year two no matter what.

I started a BAGM with a custom team replacing the Coyotes (it's the exact same team roster wise just with me and my friends added in as prospects) and for my second year they want me to get into the playoffs after a 32-44-6 recored the previous year and my best player is Zbynek Michalek as an 86 overall DFD....

The AI in this game never fails to confuse and enrage me.

78 points is not just outside of the playoffs.

78 points = 3rd worst last year (Montreal)


78 points is just outside of the playoffs in NHL 13.

Edited by Gumballthechewy, 04 February 2013 - 12:28 PM.

  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#936 Pears

Pears

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,841 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:42 PM

Revamped my HUT team and it now looks like this

Booth - E. Staal - Ladd
B. Richards - Backes - Callahan
Pavelski - Stastny - Oshie
Landeskog - O'Reilly - Radulov

Hamhuis - Carle
Hedman - Wisniewski
Suter - Boyle

Hiller
Karlsson

I'm liking the way it looks
  • 0
Posted Image

Credit to (>'-')> for the amazing sig!!

#937 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:47 PM

Revamped my HUT team and it now looks like this

Booth - E. Staal - Ladd
B. Richards - Backes - Callahan
Pavelski - Stastny - Oshie
Landeskog - O'Reilly - Radulov

Hamhuis - Carle
Hedman - Wisniewski
Suter - Boyle

Hiller
Karlsson

I'm liking the way it looks


I really like my HUT team too

Kulemin [C] [87] - M. Richards [87] - Stafford [A] [86]
Lucic [86] - Backstrom [85] - Havlat [85]
Umberger [85] - Skinner [85] - Lupul [85]
Handzus [84] - Jokinen [84] - C. Wilson [84]

Pitkanen [A] [86] - Burns [86]
Ehrhoff [85] - Suter [85]
Hamhuis [85] - Bieksa [84]

Fleury [88]
Theodore [84]

I have 10K pucks, trying to get PK Subban, or save up for Duncan Keith.
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#938 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:50 PM

Hey, I was wondering if anyone could PM me or let me know when the next roster update is out.

I don't have Xbox Live where I live so I have to take it to a buddies house to update and I don't really want to be taking it there every other week for nothing.

Thanks! :)

Edited by Gumballthechewy, 04 February 2013 - 01:50 PM.

  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#939 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:51 PM

Hey, I was wondering if anyone could PM me or let me know when the next roster update is out.

I don't have Xbox Live where I live so I have to take it to a buddies house to update and I don't really want to be taking it there every other week for nothing.

Thanks! :)


There was just a roster update last week. Tarasenko, Yakupov etc. etc. etc.
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#940 Pears

Pears

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,841 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:53 PM

I really like my HUT team too

Kulemin [C] [87] - M. Richards [87] - Stafford [A] [86]
Lucic [86] - Backstrom [85] - Havlat [85]
Umberger [85] - Skinner [85] - Lupul [85]
Handzus [84] - Jokinen [84] - C. Wilson [84]

Pitkanen [A] [86] - Burns [86]
Ehrhoff [85] - Suter [85]
Hamhuis [85] - Bieksa [84]

Fleury [88]
Theodore [84]

I have 10K pucks, trying to get PK Subban, or save up for Duncan Keith.

That's a pretty solid line up. I'd say your D is slightly better than mine. If you want to spend pucks now get PK if not save up for Keith. I hate him, but he's amazing in this game.
  • 0
Posted Image

Credit to (>'-')> for the amazing sig!!

#941 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:54 PM

That's a pretty solid line up. I'd say your D is slightly better than mine. If you want to spend pucks now get PK if not save up for Keith. I hate him, but he's amazing in this game.


I know Duncan Keith is very solid in this game AND He's only 15K!! About ~6 games and I should get enough to get Keith!

Your offense is very solid, I like it! A lot better than mine! I play a defense first game though so that's where I spend most of my pucks. After all, as 2BC says, defense wins championships

Edited by Nathan MacKinnon, 04 February 2013 - 01:55 PM.

  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#942 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:56 PM

There was just a roster update last week. Tarasenko, Yakupov etc. etc. etc.


Yeah, I know, but I want to wait for the next one.

How often do they update rosters? There should be one out in a couple of weeks right?
  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#943 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 04 February 2013 - 08:17 PM

I might target Pietrangelo as well. Similar rates and similar price. Plus I like Pietrangelo a lot more IRL

He was so cheap before!! Now he's expensive because they're playing well :(
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#944 Lonny_Bohonos_14

Lonny_Bohonos_14

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,924 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 09

Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:13 AM

78 points is not just outside of the playoffs.

78 points = 3rd worst last year (Montreal)


78 points is just outside of the playoffs in NHL 13.


This. I ended up with 30 wins and was only 3rd worst. Plus throw in a handful of OT losses, and that 78 is nw 84-88
  • 0

Posted Image

Credit to -Vintage Canuck-


#945 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:21 PM

This. I ended up with 30 wins and was only 3rd worst. Plus throw in a handful of OT losses, and that 78 is nw 84-88


Ha ha! Yeah, I know right? I made the playoffs with 75 points once. Teams just don't seem to powerhouse in this game.

Actually, I was just having some fun so I threw all the legends onto the Canucks for fun, here were the lines:

Kurri (91) - Gretzky (95) - Nash (87)
Gilmore (88) - Lemieux (97) - Kesler (88)
D. Sedin (91) - H. Sedin (90) - Roenick (88)
Burrows (83) - Lapierre (78) - Kassian (78)

Edler (88) - Webber (90)
Hamihus (88) - Bieksa (84)
Ballard (81) - Barker (81)

Hasek - 94
Luongo - 89

With a superstar line up like that you'd think I'd be #1 in the leauge, dominate the playoffs and lead all scoring right? Nope! The top goal scorer on the team was Kesler with 33 goals and was ousted in the first round of the playoffs. (To the Sharks...)

Here's the top five players on my team, none of which cracked the top 10 in scoring:

Gretzky - 21G 44A 65P
Kesler - 33G 29A 62P
Lemieux - 30G 24A 54P
Weber - 9G 36A 45P
Gilmore - 14G 27A 44P

Gretzky and Lemieux should be over point per game players with their ratings.

Although I have noticed some years a team just does worse, I'm starting year two so I'll see what happens.

Edited by Gumballthechewy, 05 February 2013 - 01:23 PM.

  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#946 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:46 PM

Ha ha! Yeah, I know right? I made the playoffs with 75 points once. Teams just don't seem to powerhouse in this game.

Actually, I was just having some fun so I threw all the legends onto the Canucks for fun, here were the lines:

Kurri (91) - Gretzky (95) - Nash (87)
Gilmore (88) - Lemieux (97) - Kesler (88)
D. Sedin (91) - H. Sedin (90) - Roenick (88)
Burrows (83) - Lapierre (78) - Kassian (78)

Edler (88) - Webber (90)
Hamihus (88) - Bieksa (84)
Ballard (81) - Barker (81)

Hasek - 94
Luongo - 89

With a superstar line up like that you'd think I'd be #1 in the leauge, dominate the playoffs and lead all scoring right? Nope! The top goal scorer on the team was Kesler with 33 goals and was ousted in the first round of the playoffs. (To the Sharks...)

Here's the top five players on my team, none of which cracked the top 10 in scoring:

Gretzky - 21G 44A 65P
Kesler - 33G 29A 62P
Lemieux - 30G 24A 54P
Weber - 9G 36A 45P
Gilmore - 14G 27A 44P

Gretzky and Lemieux should be over point per game players with their ratings.

Although I have noticed some years a team just does worse, I'm starting year two so I'll see what happens.


:picard: EA is so stupid...

Just like my Columbus GM, full of 90s on the 1st and 2nd lines and 1st and 2nd pairings, and high 80s on the third and fourth lines and third pairing. also two elite goalies in net. didn't even win the presidents and I lost in the first round, wtf.
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#947 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:04 PM

:picard: EA is so stupid...

Just like my Columbus GM, full of 90s on the 1st and 2nd lines and 1st and 2nd pairings, and high 80s on the third and fourth lines and third pairing. also two elite goalies in net. didn't even win the presidents and I lost in the first round, wtf.


It's like having a team full of superstars over one or two doesn't make much difference.

I should try these lines:

Lemieux - Gretzky - Crosby
Ovechkin - Datsyuk - Kurri
Kolvachuck - Malkin - Nash
Gilmore - Kesler - Roenick

Keith - Webber
Edler - Hamihus
Chara - Doughty

Hasek
Luongo or Lundqvist

If I don't win the Presidents Trophy, the Stanley Cup have most of my players in the top 10 in scoring and pretty much win every trophy in the NHL, then EA has made a flawed product.

I'm not even being vain, that's pretty much some of the best players in the leauge plus six legends. Two if which where the two best players to have ever touched a puck.

Speaking of legends, why isn't Bobby Orr in the game?
  • 1

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#948 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:39 PM

It's like having a team full of superstars over one or two doesn't make much difference.

I should try these lines:

Lemieux - Gretzky - Crosby
Ovechkin - Datsyuk - Kurri
Kolvachuck - Malkin - Nash
Gilmore - Kesler - Roenick

Keith - Webber
Edler - Hamihus
Chara - Doughty

Hasek
Luongo or Lundqvist

If I don't win the Presidents Trophy, the Stanley Cup have most of my players in the top 10 in scoring and pretty much win every trophy in the NHL, then EA has made a flawed product.

I'm not even being vain, that's pretty much some of the best players in the leauge plus six legends. Two if which where the two best players to have ever touched a puck.

Speaking of legends, why isn't Bobby Orr in the game?


Bobby Orr is known to be a very shy guy, so I doubt he would agree to having himself in a hockey game. He didn't even agree to a biography
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#949 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:45 PM

Bobby Orr is known to be a very shy guy, so I doubt he would agree to having himself in a hockey game. He didn't even agree to a biography


Didn't he write a memoir, or is in the prosses of writing one?

I'm a pretty shy person but if I was a hockey star I wouldn't hesitate to lend my likeness to a video game.

On a side note can anyone tell me what each star penitential equals? Like 3 starts = ?? overall.

Edited by Gumballthechewy, 05 February 2013 - 07:48 PM.

  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#950 Lonny_Bohonos_14

Lonny_Bohonos_14

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,924 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 09

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:09 AM

Didn't he write a memoir, or is in the prosses of writing one?

I'm a pretty shy person but if I was a hockey star I wouldn't hesitate to lend my likeness to a video game.

On a side note can anyone tell me what each star penitential equals? Like 3 starts = ?? overall.


Yeah, I'm never sure what to expect. I always just go with a 'the more, the better' approach. ;)
  • 0

Posted Image

Credit to -Vintage Canuck-


#951 canucks#01fan

canucks#01fan

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,975 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 06 February 2013 - 05:43 PM

Lp
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck- for avatar

#952 canucks#01fan

canucks#01fan

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,975 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 06 February 2013 - 05:45 PM

Played a hut game and go up 2-0 and the guy turns his mic on and starts bitching then quit

Love it
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck- for avatar

#953 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:09 PM

Haha I just got Duncan Keith for 14.5K pucks, decent as he usually goes for 16-18K. Team is looking special now....

....in other news I played a team with Crosby, Malkin, Stamkos, Datsyuk, Letang, Phaneuf, Chara, Price, and more.....-.-
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#954 mrsasaki

mrsasaki

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,757 posts
  • Joined: 19-May 12

Posted 07 February 2013 - 05:18 PM

On a side note can anyone tell me what each star penitential equals? Like 3 starts = ?? overall.

Well I've found that 3 end up with a depth player/3rd liner <80 overall. 3.5 is usually good impact players, with 4 being stars and obviously 4.5 are superstars

Edited by mrsasaki, 07 February 2013 - 05:18 PM.

  • 0
CDC Sim Connected: Nashville GM
LOB (PS3): Boston GM

#955 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 07 February 2013 - 06:28 PM

Well I've found that 3 end up with a depth player/3rd liner <80 overall. 3.5 is usually good impact players, with 4 being stars and obviously 4.5 are superstars


Ok, thanks!
  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#956 87Crosby

87Crosby

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 264 posts
  • Joined: 01-December 11

Posted 07 February 2013 - 09:43 PM

I stopped playing cuz after finishing 25 years in gm mode I started again and it was so slow
  • 0
Posted Image

#957 Erik Karlsson

Erik Karlsson

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,675 posts
  • Joined: 24-March 09

Posted 07 February 2013 - 10:17 PM

I stopped playing cuz after finishing 25 years in gm mode I started again and it was so slow


haha I usually make it like 8 years into it then end up restarting. I always end up trading the Sedins, I don't like them in the game lol.

I always trade for Tarasenko, Yakupov, Schultz
  • 0

Posted Image

Credit to -Vintage Canuck-


#958 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 07 February 2013 - 10:49 PM

haha I usually make it like 8 years into it then end up restarting. I always end up trading the Sedins, I don't like them in the game lol.

I always trade for Tarasenko, Yakupov, Schultz


I never play Vancouver in BAGM. Useally I just make my own team and replace Phoenix, same roster just my own custom team.
  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!


#959 Nathan MacKinnon

Nathan MacKinnon

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,242 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 10

Posted 07 February 2013 - 10:52 PM

I never play Vancouver in BAGM. Useally I just make my own team and replace Phoenix, same roster just my own custom team.


I love rebuilding so I usually pick Columbus, NYI, etc.
  • 0

+1 this post!

Posted Image

Credit to Intoewsables :wub: :wub: :wub:

Formerly known as UMADBRO?

Luongo Supporter. Does not deserve any of this BS


#960 Gumballthechewy

Gumballthechewy

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,846 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 11

Posted 07 February 2013 - 10:56 PM

I love rebuilding so I usually pick Columbus, NYI, etc.


Yeah, rebuilding is fun. When you win the Cup with a rebuilt team there's a little more sense of accomplishment.
  • 0

Don't take anything I say seriously! EVER!





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.