Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

(Discussion + Proposal) Would you give up Luongo + 2 1st's (2013 & '14) for Huberdeau & Bjugstad?


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 Hunter Shinkaruk #9

Hunter Shinkaruk #9

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:43 PM

My answer is YES.

Its really for discussion but here is my proposal:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Florida:
Roberto Luongo, Jordan Schroeder, Kevin Connauton, VAN 2013 1st + VAN 2014 1st

To Vancouver:
Jonathan Huberdeau & Nick Bjugstad

Luongo + 2013 = Huberdeau
Schoeder, Connauton + 2014 1st = Bjugstad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- We have to cut some salary and get younger
- If Florida continues this losing streak, this could work out better for both teams
- Huberdeau is most likely an "untouchable" in Florida, but we could maybe get him with that extra 1st
- Luongo would be able to play more comfortably down in Florida
- Florida has the cap space to make this type of move

VAN 2013-2014
Sedin Sedin Kassian
Huberdeau Kesler Booth
Higgins/Raymond Bjugstad Burrows
Jensen Lapierre Hansen
Volpatti, Weise

Hamhuis Bieksa
Edler Garrison
Ballard Tanev
Alberts Barker

Schneider & Läck / Backup (Ellis?)

FLA 2013-2014
Fleischmann Weiss Kovalev?
Kopecky Schroeder Versteeg
Bergenheim Shore Mueller
Smithson Goc Upshall
Santorelli, Parros

Campbell Kuba
Jovanovski Gudbranson
Kulikov Weaver
Ellerby Strachan

Luongo & Theodore / Clemmensen

DISCUSS.
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to the incomparable, -Vintage Canuck-. Thank you, sir!

#2 canuck_trevor16

canuck_trevor16

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,657 posts
  • Joined: 15-January 07

Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:47 PM

we would never get both Huberdeau & Bjugstad............one or the other.........replace Schroeder with Raymond
  • 0

One day some of us will look back on the year and look at the chicago, and most of us will realize that it was a small bump in the road to the cup


WIN THE CUP FOR SALO CAMPAIGN

#3 stexx

stexx

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,216 posts
  • Joined: 19-April 08

Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:48 PM

from a canucks viewpoint: absolutely get two grade A prospects huberdeau can play centre and wing. Wouldnt help us for this year especially with kesler out as huberdeau isnt ready to be a centre in the NHL but for the future would be a huge coup for mike gillis.

florida i doubt they would touch this deal with a 10 foot pole just for the optics of the deal from a management perspective. trade your almost nhl ready prospects for an NHL goalie that is in his prime and rebuild with 2 1st round picks? doesnt make a ton of sense.
  • 0

#4 Pears

Pears

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,841 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:49 PM

I wouldn't hesitate
  • 0
Posted Image

Credit to (>'-')> for the amazing sig!!

#5 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,217 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:56 PM

Why would florida want to? It makes no sense for them at all.
  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image
---------------------------------------------------

#6 Hunter Shinkaruk #9

Hunter Shinkaruk #9

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:59 PM

from a canucks viewpoint: absolutely get two grade A prospects huberdeau can play centre and wing. Wouldnt help us for this year especially with kesler out as huberdeau isnt ready to be a centre in the NHL but for the future would be a huge coup for mike gillis.

florida i doubt they would touch this deal with a 10 foot pole just for the optics of the deal from a management perspective. trade your almost nhl ready prospects for an NHL goalie that is in his prime and rebuild with 2 1st round picks? doesnt make a ton of sense.


They could use one of those 1st round picks as leverage in a different trade for a good NHL caliber forward.
  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to the incomparable, -Vintage Canuck-. Thank you, sir!

#7 Beluga Whale

Beluga Whale

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts
  • Joined: 12-August 11

Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:12 PM

lololol, of course we would do it. Would Florida do it? Hell no!!
  • 0
Posted Image
Prestige Worldwide - GM of the Boston Bruins Posted Image

#8 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:27 PM

No.
  • 0
Posted Image

#9 Rhinogator

Rhinogator

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,732 posts
  • Joined: 14-May 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:54 PM

both teams say no.
  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image

#10 pibroch

pibroch

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 386 posts
  • Joined: 01-July 11

Posted 27 January 2013 - 12:02 AM

No.
  • 0

#11 Phil_314

Phil_314

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,782 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 09

Posted 27 January 2013 - 12:24 AM

Huberdeau would be a steal; clutch future franchise cornerstones aren't available every day!

Wouldn't mind if Bjugstad but def. target Big Game Johnny first! Lu and 2014 1st pref. for Huberdeau, since it's been said that this year's draft will be pretty strong and full of franchise-type guys and it would be great to get someone big and bruising like Darnell Nurse at the end of 1st round. Also I'd like to see how Gaunce's skating pans out before rushing out to get Bjugstad.
  • 0

John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.


Jesus LOVES YOU!
2012, meet Matthew 24:36-47!

14 I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.


#12 keslercrosby

keslercrosby

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 384 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 11

Posted 27 January 2013 - 08:06 AM

If that ever happens;

Huberdeau, Bjugstad, Jensen, Gaunce, Kassian = nice young core for the future :towel:

I think Gillis should really trick tallon to at least giving up one of them: Lu, Raymond/Schroeder, pick for Huberdeau/Bjugstad + 1st.
  • 0

#13 keslercrosby

keslercrosby

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 384 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 11

Posted 27 January 2013 - 08:09 AM

nvm

Edited by keslercrosby, 27 January 2013 - 08:10 AM.

  • 0

#14 Spoosh

Spoosh

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,149 posts
  • Joined: 10-August 05

Posted 27 January 2013 - 10:42 AM

Floridan would be silly to go for a trade like that. But for us it would be a steal of a deal.

Not going to happen though.
  • 0
© 2000, 2014 K'Spoosh Entertainment Ltd.

Misuse of this almost copyrighted information will with near certainty lead to misuse of it.


Posted Image

#15 Mr. White

Mr. White

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,554 posts
  • Joined: 22-May 12

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:55 AM

Of course I would do it! Florida would be stupid to say yes though
  • 0
Posted Image
^VanCauck93^

#16 ken kaniff

ken kaniff

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 895 posts
  • Joined: 18-June 11

Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:10 PM

no, Bjustad is very unproven and Huberdeau wont be traded. either way this is a very risky trade for Van and i would not do it ever.
Schroeder +1st > Bjustad imo. that 1st could be another great player, thats better than Bjustad.
  • 0
RIP rick
Sig too big.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.