You make good points Deb but really if getting angry on the bench, fingerpointing, shotblocking, and asking your superstars to take on a larger important role on the team kills your team I think it's pretty safe to assume this core is not what they think they are.
These are NHL players right, not 12 year old kids in peewee?
I would be more inclined to believe Torts was directly linked to the downfall had we not
Been treading water for several years now without MG making the necessary changes
Been surrounded by a nasty goalie controvery for 3 years
Have an aging core which has been downtrending
Moved to arguably the toughest division in hockey
Had 6th most man games lost to injury
In my opinion the writing was on the wall I wouldn't have blinked an eye had AV been retained and we ended up in the same position. Personally I think AV would have gotten a bit more out of them due to experience, but not much.
I have to agree the Sedins didn't look as good with more minutes played but Torts really must have been surprised when he learned that Gillis' plan was to actually rely on Higgins, Hansen, Sanotrelli, and Burrows for primary/secondary scoring. Sad state of affairs for any coach.