Super19 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I think he wanted to see something similar to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKz0_JngFmg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattJVD Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 As was mentioned earlier Hank said the hit was clean, and even though it was a clean hit Juice went after Brown, Ballard nocked Brown to the ice and juice tried to get him to drop the gloves. Burrows tries to get a piece of him too and ended up fighting Kopitar. Brown refused to drop the gloves after a clean hit, fair enough, Juice would have gotten the book thrown at him if he went ahead and took his gloves off and started hammering away on him. I think the response was correct, especialy the hip check Bieksa threw at Brown a few shifts later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VMR Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 2 seconds after the puck was gone?? This is called bias. It was a clean hit. I'm guessing you thought Rome's hit in the finals was clean (which it was), but for some reason Brown's hit wasnt? Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty Walrus Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Lol at the canucks making anyone pay. They do not have the players to do that, it's that simple. This team is not intimidating at all. Even the next time we play Chicago there will be no response, no one will be going after Keith, it's just the way this team is built right now and we have to deal with it. Until this core is changed in the future we will be a soft team with an identity crisis. It's funny that we are easily one of the softest teams in the league and a team where the players get abused and disrespected consistently, but yet the coaches an management refuse to fix it. Both Orr and macintyre where put on waivers last year and could of been picked up at half their salary, but no the canucks did not pick one of them up, it's not like the Canucks get abused and need an enforcer right? Absolutely ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCammer Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I thought Bieksa's response was fine. Tried to get him to fight and then made sure to hit him "clean" later in the game. Had we been ahead by a couple of goals I think you would have seen a more "determined" response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k_man08 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Are you serious? whats wrong with people, what do you expect the response to be!? it was a clean hit, Bieksa and Burrows went after Brown, do you want blood-shed or something? F***ing people these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Romes hit was not a clean hit.... I just don't think it needed 4 games in the playoffs. Have you watch the hit? Have you watched any other series? Something bad is happening in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyville88 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.