SpursCanuck Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Van - Luongo Raymond 2nd For Chi - Kane Bolland First proposal, so go easy. This makes sense to me as the Blackhawks desperately need a goaltender and have no confidence in Crawford. Canucks get that top line winger to play with Sedins or second line winger to play with Booth and Kesler. Canucks then give Raymond and a 2nd for Bolland. Very good clutch player and good player come playoffs and would be a great third Line player with Lappierre or could even on the odd occasion play on the second if need be? What you think... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Might need to add a tad more on our side. Here's a counter proposal: To Vancouver: Patrick Kane + Dave Bolland To Chicago: Roberto Luongo + Manny Malhotra + David Booth + Yann Sauvé + 2013 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Kane? Even though this trade is a steal, no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursCanuck Posted June 18, 2012 Author Share Posted June 18, 2012 I think that is a little of an overpayment, how about... Kane Bolland For Luongo Booth Connauton 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursCanuck Posted June 18, 2012 Author Share Posted June 18, 2012 Kane? Even though this trade is a steal, no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Why not, Kane is a good player...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursCanuck Posted June 18, 2012 Author Share Posted June 18, 2012 I have a deep dwelling hatred for him, and I do not wish him to be on my team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I thought it would be something like that, there is some players I dislike too but I think Kane would thrive on this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursCanuck Posted June 18, 2012 Author Share Posted June 18, 2012 I actually think he wouldn't. Unless he has a complete change of attitude, I really doubt he and AV would see eye-to-eye. And if recent history has taught me anything, its that a players relationship with AV has a pretty big correlation with their success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpush Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I would rather take Hjarmarrson + for Loungo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ButterBean Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 No way Chicago does this. The gap in play between Crawford and Luongo is much smaller than how much worse their offense and defense is without Kane and Bolland. Their offensive depth becomes pretty thin after Toews, Sharp, Hossa. Not to mention Bolland's choice words for the Sedins and Kane's antics off of the ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I would rather take Hjarmarrson + for Loungo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Subban Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I have a deep dwelling hatred for him, and I do not wish him to be on my team. But like I said that trade would still be a steal for us value wise . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I doubt Chicago would do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 lol But nothing to say about bolland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 lol ppl are showing their hatred towards Kane and I think they forgot about the second player that Chicago would be giving...Bolland! There's no way Bolland would come to the Canucks and play on the same team as the Sedins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 I actually think he wouldn't. Unless he has a complete change of attitude, I really doubt he and AV would see eye-to-eye. And if recent history has taught me anything, its that a players relationship with AV has a pretty big correlation with their success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Why do you want Bolland? Ew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avicii Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Bolland is the best 3rd line center in the NHL. Is there anything he can't do efficiently as a 3rd line C? He can: PP/PK/Hit/Score/Pass/Piss people off/Win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_Kariya28 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 The Blackhawks wouldn't do that for Bolland alone, they all hate Luongo and don't want him near their team. When Bowman hears Kane's name mentioned, he'll laugh his ass off, and never pick up the phone again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.