Master 112 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 I was just pointing out last time we played, both of them posted almost the same thing at the same time in defense of myself. I agree with this. I'm glad they're defending me, but keep in mind, TP, that just because they defend an innocent does not mean they're also innocent. They do have histories trying to pull this kind of stuff. Just last game, in fact. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Hehe, you insinuated that I might be the real doc, called for a confirmation via investigation casting doubts on the legitimacy of VICs out right claims that I was confirmed mafia - if thats not defending me, I'm not sure what is.... asking for the Lackey to PM him is pretty much saying "Hi, I'm Mafia" - or at least pretending, there's nothing much left to do at that point but go on... -------------- I was just pointing out last time we played, both of them posted almost the same thing at the same time in defense of myself. Does Toews defend people when he's TP? Toews definitely defends people when he's TP. He also likes to defend TP when he's mafia, and more subtly for his teammates in that case. Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 asking for the Lackey to PM him is pretty much saying "Hi, I'm Mafia" - or at least pretending, there's nothing much left to do at that point but go on... My assumption is that that post was a joke, or maybe he was really trying to fish out the Lackey as a TP. I post stuff like that at the beginning of the game all the time. I was just pointing out last time we played, both of them posted almost the same thing at the same time in defense of myself. Does Toews defend people when he's TP? Sorry, but that doesn't mean a whole lot. Yes, I'll defend people if I think the case against them is weak. Link to comment
Otis Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Hehe, you insinuated that I might be the real doc, called for a confirmation via investigation casting doubts on the legitimacy of VICs out right claims that I was confirmed mafia - if thats not defending me, I'm not sure what is.... asking for the Lackey to PM him is pretty much saying "Hi, I'm Mafia" - or at least pretending, there's nothing much left to do at that point but go on... -------------- I was just pointing out last time we played, both of them posted almost the same thing at the same time in defense of myself. Does Toews defend people when he's TP? I asked for you or CL to be investigated, please. when people get accused for something like this - especially from Kesler, I would recommenced staying on the cautious side, i mean it's good that it was brought up in the thread but to think of it as any kind of evidence is laughable. VIC, I am curious as to why you were inclined to take Kesler's side so quickly? The only other time I remember you doing something like that was a few games back when you were mafia and said something like "Well I don't believe him but I'll listen to him" Link to comment
Dral Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 My assumption is that that post was a joke, or maybe he was really trying to fish out the Lackey as a TP. I post stuff like that at the beginning of the game all the time. Sorry, but that doesn't mean a whole lot. Yes, I'll defend people if I think the case against them is weak. Heh, I wish I knew everybody's habits better. Still, sometimes fresh eyes are good. Like I said it was like de ja vu If 112 is going to stick to his guns and say he'll self ban himself for 10 games if he comes up mafia (swear?) I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. Don't think I'm not watching you all though Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 VIC, I am curious as to why you were inclined to take Kesler's side so quickly? The only other time I remember you doing something like that was a few games back when you were mafia and said something like "Well I don't believe him but I'll listen to him" Yeah, VIC seemed pretty eager to start a bandwagon on 112... Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 http://forum.canucks...80#entry9940056 Great game eh? Link to comment
Master 112 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Oh that is golden. Link to comment
Master 112 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Great game eh? Almost as good as this next one. Also, VIC hasn't pushed very hard for my lynching, although the immediate vote for me and later backtrack seems a little odd to me. Link to comment
mau5trap Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 If the Doppel guy uses his save and misses, does that constitute as the only chance he gets to use it? Or does his save actually have to save someone for it officially count? Vote1: PPCLI Dudes just making us waste our resources on him so that the Mafia can make a clean hit without worrying about a save. Don't think he would have just blatantly come out like that if he really had the intention of helping the TP win. Also because I have work, class, and a fat assignment due Friday so I'm submitting my vote now. Prove me wrong, PPCLI. Make me change my mind. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 I asked for you or CL to be investigated, please. when people get accused for something like this - especially from Kesler, I would recommenced staying on the cautious side, i mean it's good that it was brought up in the thread but to think of it as any kind of evidence is laughable. VIC, I am curious as to why you were inclined to take Kesler's side so quickly? The only other time I remember you doing something like that was a few games back when you were mafia and said something like "Well I don't believe him but I'll listen to him" I felt the length of the convo combined with the fact that 112 hadn't called out Kesler in the thread was pretty damning. Obviously it's less so with re-reads. If I was mafia, I probably would have been a lot more cautious about it. I tend to defend the TP getting suspicion if the case is weak and then vote for a different TP I feel I can substantiate, but is unlikely to get voted out. Of course, I've since diversified with more easily mentioning teammates when I'm mafia. That was a pretty different situation. I spent the whole first round grilling Kesler and then wanted to make either AT or I appear clean if one of us died. I didn't even realize Kesler had called for AT to be voted out a few posts above. I just felt I could substantiate the vote because AT was acting overly defensive, but I was too busy for a longer vote. Link to comment
GreenDemon Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Vote1: GreenDemon No, I'm not going along with the One one two vote. Yes, I'm picking on the new guy. Worst logic ever.. It's rarely ever the new guy! Vote JE14 Still stuck on the idea that Drouin outed himself to him. JE seems like he knows what he is doing so if JE turns out to be TP, then we have a sure fire vote for tomorrow. Link to comment
Höglander87 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 One of Vic/intoews/CL is definitely mafia Link to comment
JE14 Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Worst logic ever.. It's rarely ever the new guy! Vote JE14 Still stuck on the idea that Drouin outed himself to him. JE seems like he knows what he is doing so if JE turns out to be TP, then we have a sure fire vote for tomorrow. That post made no sense. Link to comment
Peaches Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 vote1 greendemon For now. No real reason, just in case I forget to vote. Link to comment
Aladeen Posted November 21, 2013 Author Share Posted November 21, 2013 Hey Everyone just a note that when you are voting please make sure there is not a space between the word vote and the round number otherwise I may miss your vote. For round one I type in Vote1 in the search bar Your Vote May Not Count if it's not in this EXACT format: Vote1 Aladeen (no Space between "vote" and "1" and is bolded Again Colour no longer matters but Red does look cooler 1. Go Faulk Yourself - no vote 2. Not A Fruit - No Vote 3. Dral - VICanucksfan5551 4. King Heffy - Ryp 5. Drouin - No Vote 6. PPCLI - Ryp 7. Intoewsables - GreenDemon 8. VICanucksfan5551 - One One Two 9. The Purple Panda - No Vote 10. One one two - Dral 11. Alchemy Time - No Vote 12. Kryten - Kryten 13. OurTimeToShine - Dral 14. Peaches - GreenDemon 15. otherwise - No Vote 16. Kesler87 - One One Two 17. CL - CanucksLegacy 18. Ryp - No Vote 19. Burrdaman - Ryp 20. JE14 - No Vote 21. ilduce39 - Ryp 22. mau5trap - PPCLI 23. Hodor - No Vote 24. MikeyBoy44 - No Vote 25. GreenDemon - JE14 If I have missed your vote please vote again in the proper format. Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 I'm so confused lol. Can someone give me a summary of what's happened? Link to comment
Kryten Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 I'm so confused lol. Can someone give me a summary of what's happened? Nothing important. Just vote for Kesler. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.