canuktravella Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 trade 1 tyutin, 3rd oa for 5oa torts 2nd and kenins pure cap dump trade 2 tanev for 4oa oilers get top 4 dman we get great rookie plus cap dump trade 3 hansen for caps first 26oa cap dump trade 4 sbisa to sabres for 2nd and 3rd rounder cap dump trade 5 trade 4oa and dorsett to coyotes for 7thoa and 37th oa and next yrs 2nd rounder they get tkachuk draft puljujarvi 3rd sergachev 7th mcavoy, day, jost, brown, stanley, chychrun, draft a few of these guys with picks aquired whoever falls sign eriksson, ladd sedin sedin eriksson ladd sutter puljujarvi baertchi horvat virtanen etem granlund burrows hutton gudbranson edler sergachev tyutin tryamkin pedan stecher miller markstrom our new mother russian dcorp would destroy most teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 no i also didn't read i saved you people 30-40 seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermanbieksa Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 1st trade is a big nope from Winnipeg. 2nd trade could work. 3rd trade could potentially happen, but Caps could be in a cap crunch. because they have to resign Johansson, Latta, Wilson and Orlov with 12,7 to work with. So they are not likely to add anyone without dumping some cap. 4th: I don't think Sbisa has that much value. weak offensivly and his only good attribute is hitting. And he has a pretty bad contract. 5th Why would they trade away multiple high picks for Dorsett and having a little earlier pick. We are really lucky if we are able to sign Ladd and Eriksson with 7mil in cap space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Every one of your proposals overvalues our assets. They all say no. Plus, we don't have the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 3 hours ago, canuktravella said: trade 4oa and dorsett to coyotes for 7thoa and 37th oa and next yrs 2nd rounder they get tkachuk Pipedreams, all of them. PlanB already said it, you've overvalued everything from us. How do we get the 4th from EDM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 54 minutes ago, PlanB said: Every one of your proposals overvalues our assets. They all say no. Plus, we don't have the 4th. 39 minutes ago, Fanuck said: Pipedreams, all of them. PlanB already said it, you've overvalued everything from us. How do we get the 4th from EDM? I don't think any of those trades would happen but you guys really didn't read it closely. Tanev for 4th overall. It's right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Wow, when I see all of our players being traded for 3rd overall, 4th overall, 1st rounder and 2nd rounder, you would think that we are trading Horvat, the Sedins and Demko......but no, we are trading Tanev, Sbisa and Hansen LOL Fire JB, hire canuktravella right now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10TRAVIS NUCK10 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Canucks one huge big bright spot being Tanev and you want to trade him......to the f#@king oilers of all places. LETS DO IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 2 hours ago, Twilight Sparkle said: no i also didn't read i saved you people 30-40 seconds You did read it...otherwise how would you decide to say "No"? Responses like yours offer nothing. Wish there was an over 14 age filter. I'd much rather read the OP's original post and spend 30-40 seconds and possibly disagree, than read something for 12teens that isn't even funny or accurate, that wastes only 3 seconds. 30-40 of possible disagreement is > 3 seconds of pure uselessness. 1. This trade needs a bit more to add for CBJ, but it is fairly close. 2. Not unrealistic and Tanev's value is at his peak right now. We are not a contender, and I would do this to maximize our future assets for when we are a contender. If trading Tanev gets us into Sergachev+, I do it. Prob not the owners desire though. 3. Fairly realistic if Wash has room. 4. I think Sbisa is worth a 3rd, maybe high second, but not both. 5. Fairly even, but I think with adding Dorsett and his cap hit, we wouldn't get the extra 2nd for the following year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 3 hours ago, Cowichan Canuck said: You did read it...otherwise how would you decide to say "No"? Responses like yours offer nothing. Wish there was an over 14 age filter. I'd much rather read the OP's original post and spend 30-40 seconds and possibly disagree, than read something for 12teens that isn't even funny or accurate, that wastes only 3 seconds. 30-40 of possible disagreement is > 3 seconds of pure uselessness. 1. This trade needs a bit more to add for CBJ, but it is fairly close. 2. Not unrealistic and Tanev's value is at his peak right now. We are not a contender, and I would do this to maximize our future assets for when we are a contender. If trading Tanev gets us into Sergachev+, I do it. Prob not the owners desire though. 3. Fairly realistic if Wash has room. 4. I think Sbisa is worth a 3rd, maybe high second, but not both. 5. Fairly even, but I think with adding Dorsett and his cap hit, we wouldn't get the extra 2nd for the following year. If there was a filter, this post wouldn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 10 minutes ago, timberz21 said: If there was a filter, this post wouldn't exist. At least the original post is trying to have a mature discussion of what he believes is plausible to him. You or I might not agree with it, but who are we to say? If you are referring to my post, I am also trying to have a discussion based on the OP, adding in my beliefs that you don't need to agree with, which is the whole point of these boards. I have no problems with the original post, though I don't believe it to be 100% accurate to my views. Twilight Sparkles post is completely useless, inaccurate and I can't believe anyone would encourage that type of response with a +1 or find funny if over 14, no matter if they agree with it or not. Shouldn't responses add more of a solution, rather than the typical "You're wrong!" with no explanation as to how you think why? Pretty easy to just say that, than stand behind you're own opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 5 hours ago, 10TRAVIS NUCK10 said: Canucks one huge big bright spot being Tanev and you want to trade him......to the f#@king oilers of all places. LETS DO IT Agree. On top of this, maybe you get the 32nd out of Edmonton for Tanev but not a chance at the 4th overall. 6 hours ago, timberz21 said: Wow, when I see all of our players being traded for 3rd overall, 4th overall, 1st rounder and 2nd rounder, you would think that we are trading Horvat, the Sedins and Demko......but no, we are trading Tanev, Sbisa and Hansen LOL Fire JB, hire canuktravella right now! The funny thing being that Horvat, the Sedins and Demko would not get those returns either.. Maybe packaged all together (forgetting the Sedin's salary, NMC etc) they would get that 4th overall. Of all the teams in the league, the nucks have the least valuable assets. We will see what JB can do with what he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 8 hours ago, supermanbieksa said: 1st trade is a big nope from Winnipeg. 2nd trade could work. 3rd trade could potentially happen, but Caps could be in a cap crunch. because they have to resign Johansson, Latta, Wilson and Orlov with 12,7 to work with. So they are not likely to add anyone without dumping some cap. 4th: I don't think Sbisa has that much value. weak offensivly and his only good attribute is hitting. And he has a pretty bad contract. 5th Why would they trade away multiple high picks for Dorsett and having a little earlier pick. We are really lucky if we are able to sign Ladd and Eriksson with 7mil in cap space. jackets have 3rd not jets lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 6 hours ago, Cowichan Canuck said: You did read it...otherwise how would you decide to say "No"? Responses like yours offer nothing. Wish there was an over 14 age filter. I'd much rather read the OP's original post and spend 30-40 seconds and possibly disagree, than read something for 12teens that isn't even funny or accurate, that wastes only 3 seconds. 30-40 of possible disagreement is > 3 seconds of pure uselessness. 1. This trade needs a bit more to add for CBJ, but it is fairly close. 2. Not unrealistic and Tanev's value is at his peak right now. We are not a contender, and I would do this to maximize our future assets for when we are a contender. If trading Tanev gets us into Sergachev+, I do it. Prob not the owners desire though. 3. Fairly realistic if Wash has room. 4. I think Sbisa is worth a 3rd, maybe high second, but not both. 5. Fairly even, but I think with adding Dorsett and his cap hit, we wouldn't get the extra 2nd for the following year. thanks cowichan all these posters think none of our players have any value and dont really know hockey tanev has a ton of value and oilers needs defence not another high pick. sbisa maybe we could get late second for him he does have a lil value. hes almost a top 4 dman bit of a tweener but still a good 3rd pairing dman. the coyotes would have to overpay if they wanted tkachuk thats why i added the secind the following yr dorsett was just a cap dump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 1 hour ago, Ronaldoescobar said: Agree. On top of this, maybe you get the 32nd out of Edmonton for Tanev but not a chance at the 4th overall. The funny thing being that Horvat, the Sedins and Demko would not get those returns either.. Maybe packaged all together (forgetting the Sedin's salary, NMC etc) they would get that 4th overall. Of all the teams in the league, the nucks have the least valuable assets. We will see what JB can do with what he has. oilers need a top four dman 4th overall would be the cost otherwise why would we trade them a dman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.