NHL97OneTimer Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 7 hours ago, Standing_Tall#37 said: Are you willing to give up; this years 1st+Boeser+ someone like Stetcher. Thats what landeskog would probably cost and to me...that's too much. A first and Boeser is fine but as soon as you threw in Stetcher you lost all credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 2 hours ago, Alflives said: Doesn't Landeskog have concussion issues? I think Tanev for Mackinon is better for us. Put Mackinon on Bo's wing, and watch out! Yippee! Mackinnon will be so expensive At least Boeser + Demko + 1st. AT LEAST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 6 hours ago, billabong said: Explain to me why col has a fit for tanev? Look at their d and get back to me Because Alf is incessantly trolling y'all with it. Then when you call him out it's, "Well how about Reinhart? Would that work?" and it's playtime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 12 hours ago, NHL97OneTimer said: But we'd have to throw in Dorsett and a second... of course, we could add a bit to sweeten the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 On 9/13/2016 at 3:34 AM, JC2 said: I agree with this, if it were just Tanev and a pick I would be all for it. Tanev is a very solid defenseman and I think he is definitely underrated for what he does but to think he could get landeskog is wishful thinking. The Avs would probably want Horvat or virtanen plus a high pick thrown in and that is just too much. I'd rather be patient and wait one more year for Boeser and whoever else hits the free agent market. Tanev is not underrated for what he does.. everyone around the league knows he's a good defender.. and that's pretty much it.. a good defender that doesn't intimidate the other team.. not physical at all.. and injury prone.. he missed 10+ games every single season in his career in the nhl so far.. far from durable/reliable.. i dunno if a top shutdown dman with 0 offensive capability can even be considered a top pairing defenseman.. you wouldn't put him on the powerplay.. you wouldn't put him out in the last min down by a goal.. if it's Tanev + Virtanen for Landeskog or either side toss in a pick i'd do it.. Defense wise we have lots of up and coming dman that's currently on the NHL club and some prospects including Juolevi.. Virtanen i can do with or without as i see him nothing better than a kassian 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.