Alflives Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 3 minutes ago, Realtor Rod said: Easy hippy, Tanevs good, but he is not one of the best defensive dmen or he would have received a call from team Canada. As for GL, this dude is stellar. He is a better version of Horvat. If Colorado had Tanev and wanted to deal him to us for Horvat, you wouldnt make that trade. GL is better than Bo. No he's not. Bo is a centre for one, so he will impact the game more. GL is already a serious concussion risk. JB was probably offered GL for Tanev, and he said add a second and he would think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: No he's not. Bo is a centre for one, so he will impact the game more. GL is already a serious concussion risk. JB was probably offered GL for Tanev, and he said add a second and he would think about it. Haha, too funny. No GM trades GL straight up for Tanev OR Horvat. Sorry, homerism is not a measurable category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robvp Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: No he's not. Bo is a centre for one, so he will impact the game more. GL is already a serious concussion risk. JB was probably offered GL for Tanev, and he said add a second and he would think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 minute ago, robvp said: 2 minutes ago, Realtor Rod said: Haha, too funny. No GM trades GL straight up for Tanev OR Horvat. Sorry, homerism is not a measurable category. Wow! There are some real Tanev haters among (so called) Canuck's fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Wow! There are some real Tanev haters among (so called) Canuck's fans. Nope, I really like him, I mean he is a 98 rating in my homerism category, unfortunately that doesn't translate to the real world nhl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.B Cooper Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 11 minutes ago, Alflives said: No he's not. Bo is a centre for one, so he will impact the game more. GL is already a serious concussion risk. JB was probably offered GL for Tanev, and he said add a second and he would think about it. I'm a big Tanev and Bo fan. Love them both, don't want either traded. BUT. Landy is by far a better player than both of them. The kid is everything we could hope Horvat will turn into Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 9 minutes ago, Realtor Rod said: Nope, I really like him, I mean he is a 98 rating in my homerism category, unfortunately that doesn't translate to the real world nhl. UBWrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robvp Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 15 minutes ago, Alflives said: Wow! There are some real Tanev haters among (so called) Canuck's fans. Love Tanev. Laughing because you think they called us offering Landeskog for Tanev straight up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't post much and even if know Tanev for Landeskog is too funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 32 minutes ago, Franz Liszt said: I don't post much and even if know Tanev for Landeskog is too funny. Unless you are on melmac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 I'm a huge Tanev fan but him alone is not worth Landeskog. This is not a Larsson type deal here, for one that is an anomaly. Two, Tanev is 2 years older. Three I don't think Colorado is nearly as desperate for D as Edmonton was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Did anybody else see Gabe the Babes one T from Karlsson he went top cheese almost bar down. That kids a player. He oozes leadership and winning in his interviews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realtor Rod Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 14 minutes ago, Chip Kelly said: Did anybody else see Gabe the Babes one T from Karlsson he went top cheese almost bar down. That kids a player. He oozes leadership and winning in his interviews. Yep, he would be a great addition. I would guess Tanev and Horvat gets it done *crickets* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 15 minutes ago, Chip Kelly said: Did anybody else see Gabe the Babes one T from Karlsson he went top cheese almost bar down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horvats_Big_Head Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 I will explode if Bo is traded for anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HorvatToBaertschi Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 I think Tanev + 1st gets it done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 hour ago, HorvatToBaertschi said: I think Tanev + 1st gets it done i'm not sure i can part with the number pick especially considering we are in the middle of a our rebuild. there's a good chance we don't make the postseason this year. injuries to players is quite realistic especially in the division and conference the Canucks are in. it's a risk though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HorvatToBaertschi Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 4 hours ago, N4ZZY said: i'm not sure i can part with the number pick especially considering we are in the middle of a our rebuild. there's a good chance we don't make the postseason this year. injuries to players is quite realistic especially in the division and conference the Canucks are in. it's a risk though. Its definetely à hard chip to get rid of but it is Landeskog we are Talking about. Hé would be perfect for our team in every sensé of the term and is worth the slight overpayment in my opinion Landeskog horvat virtanen Sedin sedin eriksson Baertschi sutter hansen Etem granlund burrows Gaunce Edler gudbranson Hutton tryamkin Sbisa larsen Pedan Biega I think thats à playoff team, and à dark horse as soon as next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 hour ago, HorvatToBaertschi said: Its definetely à hard chip to get rid of but it is Landeskog we are Talking about. Hé would be perfect for our team in every sensé of the term and is worth the slight overpayment in my opinion Landeskog horvat virtanen Sedin sedin eriksson Rodin sutter hansen Etem granlund burrows Gaunce Edler gudbranson Hutton tryamkin Sbisa larsen Pedan Biega I think thats à playoff team, and à dark horse as soon as next year what happened to the second half of your username in that lineup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick_fan Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 4 hours ago, HorvatToBaertschi said: I think Tanev + 1st gets it done The only way a Landeskog deal works is if Nucks added either Boeser or Virtanen or Horvat in the mix. If people think Sakic is as crazy as Chiarelli, give yer heads a shake lol - Tanev and 1st will not get Landeskog alone. Chiarelli did not set any trading standard lmfao, he jus plain A$$ crazy y'all. I too thought maybe Tanev alone would work but if you look at the big blockbuster trades, teams lose big players in exchange. I think best bet is to keep our best prospects. Canucks should just keep their D together at least for the first half of the season. Maybe explore Sbisa trade options, Nucks would have to retain salary. I think his salary and Bennings expectations are scaring off teams. Nucks have room for 2 more salaries they can retain. If they were to retain half his salary, there are a few players that might land a deal. Hurricanes - Andrej Nestrasil, he is 6'3" and projected to be on first line with Staal Hurricanes - Joakim Nordstrom, he is 6'1" and also projected to be on first line with Staal Devils - Jacob Josefson, he is 6'0" and hockey futures thinks he has the make-up to eventually evolve into a perennial 65-75 point top-two centre. - they are all used as wingers - these three are more of projects, and TBH, so is Sbisa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.