zombieksa Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Would throw a rock through TV screen: - Hank - Dank - Burrows - Kesler - Bieksa Would be damned bummed about: - Hamhuis - Higgins - Hansen - Lappy -Tanev Neutral: - Garrison - Kassian Like but okay with trading: - Raymond - Booth - Edler (think of the return drool...) - Schneider - Schroeder Little emotion either way: - Alberts - Barker - Weise - Sestito Need to trade: -Ballard (for obvious reason) What I would like in a trade: - At least 1 center, preferably 2. (Playmaker to push Kesler to wing, and a 3rd liner to give Schroeder more time in Chcago.) - A veteran goalie preferably signed for next season as well or willing to extend. - A right hand D. - 5/6M in cap room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad_Duck Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 What's wrong with Burrows?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksSayEh Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 My biggest problem with Burrows is that he is a dirty player. Him and Kesler with their trash talk and cheap shots is why a lot of teams despise the Canucks. Just look at the finger biting incident vs. Boston. How big of an embarrassment was that? He's also a one trick pony. How many times are we going to see the 'patented' backhand-forehand move? Every goalie in the league knows what is coming when Burrows is in alone. He has a great story, coming up from the ECHL, never being drafted, and now plays on the top line. He's also scored some HUGE goals for us over the years. I like the guy, I just think that he brings a negative to the team with the trash talk and dirty play. These guys are professionals. They shouldn't act like children on the play yard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossram Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 At some point in time, CDC would have been willing to give away every player for free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 My biggest problem with Burrows is that he is a dirty player. Him and Kesler with their trash talk and cheap shots is why a lot of teams despise the Canucks. Just look at the finger biting incident vs. Boston. How big of an embarrassment was that? He's also a one trick pony. How many times are we going to see the 'patented' backhand-forehand move? Every goalie in the league knows what is coming when Burrows is in alone. He has a great story, coming up from the ECHL, never being drafted, and now plays on the top line. He's also scored some HUGE goals for us over the years. I like the guy, I just think that he brings a negative to the team with the trash talk and dirty play. These guys are professionals. They shouldn't act like children on the play yard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylecanuck Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 The only players that would really bug me to see go would be the sedins, burrows, Bieksa, kassian. The only players I'd like to see go would be Ballard, luongo/schnieder, Raymond, maybe booth... I also have this crazy thought in my head that Kesler might be on the block in the back of gillis' head which would both make me sad and happy to see him go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wendythirteenthrashers Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 The PUCKHOGS kesler and booth...... Luongo .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMacNamedDre Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 i'd like to see something like this going into playoffs, Sedin-Sedin- C.Perry N.Jensen-Kesler-Burrows Higgins- Schroeder - Hansen Sestito-Pinnizzotto-LaPierre Random 6'5 235 lb backup killer #2 + M.Raymond Hamhuis- Bieksa Edler-Tanev (Meaner version of) AHLberts - Garrison Barker, Connaughton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllEyezOnMe Posted March 5, 2013 Author Share Posted March 5, 2013 The players I would like to see stay for a good amount of time would be first and foremost the sedin twins obviously because in my opinion there the face of the canucks ever since linden and some of the other popular players retired or got traded. I also would like to see players like clutch burrows, kesler(even though he's injury prone and hasn't been on his game lately), bieksa, hamhuis. I would hate to see higgins lappy hansen or tanev go but not all of them can be on the canucks until there in there 40's lol. I'm fine with every other player gettin traded at one point or another as long as we get decent returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 I wish we would just trade a goal tender(at this point I don't care which one ) and AV but since that won't happen here are my lists. Trade: Goal tender (I don't care which one just trade one ) Ballard ( He doesn't deserve to be treated this way) Garrison Alberts New guy. Would be upset if they were traded but would be okay if we got a good return: Higgins Booth Edler(for Weber ) Raymond (I think Higgy is a better all round player and I don't see us keeping them both) Lappy DO NOT TRADE: Kesler Hank Dank Burrows Hamhuis Bieska Hansen TANEV KASSIAN Schroeder If it wasn't for the fact I think Edler could bring us back a SWEET return I would have him on this do NOT trade list but at the end of the day you need to trade something good to get something good. The reason I have Tanev (other then him being awesome) Kass, Schroeder on the do not trade list is because I think its important that we keep our young talent. The sedins will only take this team so far for so long, so we need to also think of the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xur Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Tradeable: Kesler, Higgins, Booth, Alberts, Ebbett, Barker, Weise, Schroeder, Sestito, Lapierre. Undecided: Schneider or Luongo, Ballard, Garrison. Not tradeable: Sedins, Kassian, Burrows, Hansen, Raymond, Bieksa, Edler, Hamhuis, Tanev. Untouchable Prospects: Jensen, Gaunce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Depends what the offer is for any player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Depends what the offer is for any player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 You don't trade the Sedins . They are magic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFBR392 Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Demitra Erhoff Torres Johnson Samuelsson Rome Sorry I'm from 2011 and what is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toni Zamboni Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 absolute keepers: sedins, burrows, higgins, hansen tanev, hamuis, bieksa. luongo and or schneider. the rest i could live without even tho im not saying i want anybody gone either but i wont be upset if anyone else has to go to make our team better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Carell Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 i'd like to see something like this going into playoffs, Sedin-Sedin- C.Perry N.Jensen-Kesler-Burrows Higgins- Schroeder - Hansen Sestito-Pinnizzotto-LaPierre Random 6'5 235 lb backup killer #2 + M.Raymond Hamhuis- Bieksa Edler-Tanev (Meaner version of) AHLberts - Garrison Barker, Connaughton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flem Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 What would you guys want from Columbus for Jensen or Schroeder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WonderTwinPowers Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 How do you propose we get Perry then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WonderTwinPowers Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 What would you guys want from Columbus for Jensen or Schroeder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.