PaulKariyaALH Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 The Sedins are old and clearly declining, they are soft and two of the most overrated players in the nhl. They will probably produce 50 points each season from now on. If we can trick people into believing that the Sedins are 90 point players, which they aren't even close to, we can get a massive return back. Van: Sedins + Schneider + Edler + 1st Tbl: Stamkos + Lecavalier + Malone The 1st line would be amazing Malone-Kesler-Stamkos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kumquats Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Nice try troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z0rg Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Nice try troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulKariyaALH Posted May 21, 2012 Author Share Posted May 21, 2012 Nice try troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 I'd love to see Kesler with Stamkos. Only then when Stamkos struggles would people realize that Kesler is the reason his line doesn't score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grape Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Make this the new face palm thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs2016 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 This is like the Burrows Do We Really Need Him thread again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 How is this trolling? Stamkos is a 22 year old top 3 player in the nhl, they'd want Sedins + Schneider + 1st for him. Lecavalier + Malone are also 2 great players, and Edler is 1 year away from being ufa. To make it fair, they can add their 1st, and we could package the 1st + Malone for Nash. We'd have a top 6 of Nash-Stamkos-Kesler Booth-Lecavalier-Burrows. This is much better than our top 6 right now. Also if we can dump Ballard and Raymond, and the cap goes up to 69m we'd be able to sign Suter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanj Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 · Hidden by -DLC-, May 21, 2012 - Inappropriate Hidden by -DLC-, May 21, 2012 - Inappropriate GTFO of here with that S*** you m*********** DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! /rant Link to comment
crime911 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Arigold 2.0 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Why does everybody like Malone so much? Add an e to Ryan and replace Malone with Clowe; much, MUCH better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
our time is now Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 not a bad trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underrated Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Let's trade the core of the President's Trophy winning team for the core of a bottom feeder team. Awesome!!! jk Stamkos would be amazing but Vinny and Malone are huge bad contracts. Bashing the Sedins who put up the most, or close to the most, points every year is just ridiculous. Just cause they aren't falshy doesn't mean they aren't consistently two of the best players in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 This isn't NHL 12 either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 LOL at all these posts ragging on the OP. I don't see any difference between this proposal and any other proposal; they're all pretty similar to me. Sure, the value is off and we'd be trading players with a NTC, but 90% of proposals on CDC do the same as well. And is any proposal realistic? In the realm of reality we are not magically dumping loads of cap space and signing all the free agents (where's that meme..), and at the same time we are not trading our core players. The fact of the matter is that realism has no relation to proposals. That being said, we can make our proposals fair in terms of talent for talent, or needs for needs. To the OP: Good, "outside the box" proposal. The value is off, though. In order to get Stamkos, the next great NHLer, you would have to overpay. As it stands.. Sedins > Lecavalier + Malone Stamkos >> Schneider + Edler + 1st Including Schroeder or Jensen, and a good roster player such as Hansen or another high draft pick should be able to get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgehog Hodgson Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Okay.. So this is like being a Black Hawk fan and saying "Trade Patrick Kane! And Sharp! And Toews! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 Why does everybody like Malone so much? Add an e to Ryan and replace Malone with Clowe; much, MUCH better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted May 21, 2012 Share Posted May 21, 2012 What is this I don't even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.