smokes Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Schneider for Yakupov straight up Or Schneider + our 1st rounder for Yakupov Is it possible? Tambellini and Gillis has an ok relationship with each other. The Oilers need better goal tending and Schnieds is gearing to become a franchise goaltender and at such a young age can be a great member of their core. Vancouver keeps Luongo who is still an elite goaltender while the Sedins have a potential line mate. Sedin-Sedin-Yakupov Higgins-Kesler-Booth Burrows-Lapierre-Kassian/Hansen That would be a heck of a top nine. Luongo and Lack can be a good combination. Let's not forget, Luongo helped Schnieder become the goalie that he is. I'm sure he can do the same with Lack. Would this deal make sense or am I a delusional homer who thinks Schneider can actually get a Yakupov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I hope we get yakupov or rick nash in some type of trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cs2016 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 It might not be too good to send a stellar goalie to a division rival who could possibly make life hard for the Canucks in the coming years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 It might not be too good to send a stellar goalie to a division rival who could possibly make life hard for the Canucks in the coming years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Wish Columbus had the first pick instead. Would be a much better trade off for us. I wouldn't want our team to face Edmonton as many times as we do in a year with schneids in net. At this point I think keeping Cory and trading LU would be the better option IMO. P. Kane for LU straight up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 It might not be too good to send a stellar goalie to a division rival who could possibly make life hard for the Canucks in the coming years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 If that's the way you look at it then I guess teams shouldn't make trades within their own Conference because it's only a difference of two games...... Also the Canucks would be getting Yakupov who would most likely burn the Canucks a few times down the road at some point if the Oilers keep him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Edmonton doesn't need Schneider they'd be better off trading the 1st overall for a great top pairing D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted June 2, 2012 Author Share Posted June 2, 2012 Well they kind of have that with Gilbert. Their goal tending is in worse shape than their D. Personally, I still am not convinced that Schnieder is a better goaltender that Luongo right now. Our Stanley cup window is short considering the Sedins are only getting older. Kesler is only getting more injured. Our core is not going to stay intact for long. Schnieder is going to stumble sooner or later considering he only played 68 regular season game. He is perfect for a building team like the Oilers but if you are gunning for a Cup now you gotta go with Lou. Hell even Quick has 248 games under his belt compared to Schneider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 If the TO rumour doesn't come true, woul Luongo waive for Cbj? To Vancouver: Rick Nash + 2012 2nd overall pick To Columbus: Roberto Luongo + David Booth + Kevin Connauton + Mason Raymond + Keith Ballard + Manny Malhotra Assuming they still 'want the moon' for Nash Luongo = Nash Booth, Connauton, Raymond, Ballard & Malhotra = 2nd overall pick (Yakupov) MG calls Tambellini to see if he is ok with taking Ryan Murray first overall, allowing Yakupov to fulfill his dream of becoming a Canuck (he is a Canucks fan) Sedin - Sedin - Nash Burrows - Kesler - Yakupov Higgins - Pahlsson - Schroeder Kassian - Lapierre - Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underrated Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 (Above post) No chance Luongo waives his NTC to go to Columbus A deal including Schneider and Yakupov would be extremely risky for both GM's. If one guy pans out more than the other, they will hear about it their whole careers. Much more realistic would be Schneider + other (1st round pick or Schroeder or Raymond, etc) for 2nd overall pick from Columbus. Then second overall pick and second round pick to Edmonton for 1st overall pick. Edmonton gets Murray who they want, we get Yakupov. COlumbus gets their goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Steve Tamebllini has said he is willing to trade the #1 pick, but the trade has to be well worth it for him to make the trade. What does Edmonton need an elite goalie and defense, this is where Luongo would come into the trade, this is the type of player Edmonton needs, especially since they want to keep Dubnyk and Luongo would be a perfect mentor to Dubnyk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renelsisc Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 to CBJ - Schneider - Raymond - Booth - 26th - Schroeder to EDM - 2nd - Ballard to VAN - 1st - Rick Nash CBJ gets their goalie, for the 2nd pick. For nash, they get our first, booth, Tanev, schroeder, Raymond for Nash. 3 top 6 forwards and a NHL ready d man for their rebuild. EDM gets to pick Murrary knowing that we'd pick Yakupov, and they get Ballard who is a NHL defensemen, regardless of how poor Ballard played, he's still better than their current line up. VAN gets both Nash and Yakupov. Without Ballard/Raymond/Booth contracts, we can fit Nash in there easy. Then sign Garrison and Schultz. Sedins - Burrows Nash - Kesler - Yakupov Higgins - Lapierre - Hansen Volpatti - Manny - Kassian Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Garrison Schultz - Salo Lu Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Edmonton doesn't need Schneider they'd be better off trading the 1st overall for a great top pairing D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHL Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 OTT Schneider VAN Spezza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 to CBJ - Schneider - Raymond - Booth - 26th - Schroeder to EDM - 2nd - Ballard to VAN - 1st - Rick Nash CBJ gets their goalie, for the 2nd pick. For nash, they get our first, booth, Tanev, schroeder, Raymond for Nash. 3 top 6 forwards and a NHL ready d man for their rebuild. EDM gets to pick Murrary knowing that we'd pick Yakupov, and they get Ballard who is a NHL defensemen, regardless of how poor Ballard played, he's still better than their current line up. VAN gets both Nash and Yakupov. Without Ballard/Raymond/Booth contracts, we can fit Nash in there easy. Then sign Garrison and Schultz. Sedins - Burrows Nash - Kesler - Yakupov Higgins - Lapierre - Hansen Volpatti - Manny - Kassian Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Garrison Schultz - Salo Lu Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Heyman Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 Deal 1: Luongo + 2nd 2012 Van to Toronto for 1st 2012 Tor + Cody Franson's RFA rights + 2nd 2012 Bos Deal 2: 1st Tor + 2nd 2013 Van + Kevin Connauton + Cody Franson's RFA rights to Edmonton for 1st 2012 Edmonton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaku Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 Edmonton doesn't need Schneider they'd be better off trading the 1st overall for a great top pairing D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.