Smashian Kassian Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 I would take him at this point. Lu for MacArthur, prospect, Conditional 2nd/3rd on Mac re-signing which he wont. So basically Lu for rental MacArthur, then a prospect and 2/3 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Trust me, Nonis already has his speech prepared for not making a deal this season. He's gonna go on and on how he was prepared to make a deal if it made sense, but he wasn't gonna sell the farm, and blah blah blah. Nonis and the Leafs are probably the worst trading partner. Nonis won't make a deal unless he wins outright, and the Leafs really don't have any more assets then the Canucks do. So tell me again why they're a good trading partner? Cause they're sort of interested in acquiring Luongo if they can get him for nothing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny_Drama Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Luongo for Clarke 2nd and a 2015 1st (they should be in 30th by then...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea2Sky Country Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 so leafs is the only destination for luongo wow gillis you messed this one up!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disaronno Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 When was MacArthur on waivers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down Under Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 I think lu,s contract stinks. i am a leaf fan we do not want the contract. lu is a great goalie.but his 9 more years is way to much risk for any team. i really doubt you guys get anything for him. i know for a fact yur owner does not want to buy him out.if by chance the leafs do want him they will not pay much. and the ownership in van is going to have more to say then MG. In fact i doubt this will even be a GM trade from either side. the owners of our teams will be doing this trade. As an outsider looking in what was van thinking when they signed this contract 3 years ago? if i recall snids was pushing then.did they really think it would take him 12 years to get good enought to take number 1. Before you all bash me let me remind you we as fans do not want the contract the player is fine. that cap hit for 9 more years is just bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Nonis made a good deal for Luongo. But all of his other deals are complete crap, I hated Nonis when he was our GM. Dave Nonuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 the Leafs really don't have any more assets then the Canucks do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down Under Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Nonis made a good deal for Luongo. But all of his other deals are complete crap, I hated Nonis when he was our GM. Dave Nonuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Right, because the Canucks prospect pool is SO much deeper than ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Right, because the Canucks prospect pool is SO much deeper than ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 so leafs is the only destination for luongo wow gillis you messed this one up!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1970 and beyond Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 game of chicken being played Nonis cant go into the playoff with 2 rookies and Gillis cant keep Luuu good times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Right, because the Canucks prospect pool is SO much deeper than ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lychees Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Anyone else feel the whole "Leafs talking to Kipper" is just a big "Hey MG, screw you" kind of message? I mean Kipper has made it clear that he isn't moving. I mean I'd love to have Luo AND Schneids heading into playoffs, but realistically one has to play a drastic majority of the rest of the games and be the starter to get into any groove... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 If Nonis is not about to give us roster players for Lu, and we want roster players, why not just get a high pick from Nonis, then turn around and offer that high pick to a roster player from a seller team? In the end it's a roster player for roster player for us, effectively a three way trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Påhlsson Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 There is a conspiracy by TSN to drive the asking price of Roberto down by suggesting that he has no value due to his contract. I could see Gillis boycotting TSN before he trades Luongo, and at this rate the first is more likely... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down Under Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 I never said it was deeper, I said it was about the same. Which it is. Gardiner and Rielly are their only real high end prospects. Gardiner is good, but he is severely overrated in Leafland. He can't even crack the average D core of the Leafs. And I would say Kadri has graduated out of the prospect category. Then they have quite a few B prospects like Biggs, Ashton, Ross, Finn and Colbourne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 how about we take the next 5 Leaf 2nd round picks? 2nd round picks are like gold at trade deadline day - we can parlay those into useful players (or ... I know it's crazy .... but we could actually draft players with them) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinishEveryCheck Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Would you feel better about going into the playoffs with Lu and Schneids or Schneids and Scrivens ? an extra toronto piece of garbage scrub isnt going to make me want the latter hopefully if Toronto is in the mix its a 3 way and we get a player we actually NEED from another team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.