Ilya Kovalchuk. Posted March 17, 2015 Share Posted March 17, 2015 Anyone want to switch to Columbus? I'll take anyone other than Columbus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 I would still like to switch to NYI, if possible Anyone want to switch to Columbus? I'll take anyone other than Columbus. If I can't take Anaheim from spod, I'm down for a BJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaku Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 I'll keep Colorado Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimon Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 I'm out. Good luck with the draft VC/everyone. I'll probably keep tabs on this once in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrienzy Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 I'm out. Good luck with the draft VC/everyone. I'll probably keep tabs on this once in a while. Any chance i could slide into this spot? Although, it will be weird without ya chimon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted March 21, 2015 Author Share Posted March 21, 2015 Update I am currently doing a thorough re rate of 853 players, I have completed the CK attribute and I am almost finished the DI attribute Why only 853 players? because this is how many players have played an NHL game this year. If more players play a game I will add them to STHS I have also deleted all players in the STHS program who have not played a NHL game this year All ratings will he based on an average of the last 2 seasons the player has played If a player is drafted who is not in the STHS program I will create and rate him accordingly to the above guidelines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmen81 Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 Sucks that Matthew Lombardi won't be available in this game... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crom! Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 Sucks that Matthew Lombardi won't be available in this game... Pour one out for Cheechoo as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmen81 Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 Pour one out for Cheechoo as well. True that. What about guys guys who have only played AHL games? Like Nylander or Fiala? Will they be getting created or only when we draft them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted March 21, 2015 Author Share Posted March 21, 2015 Like I said when a player is drafted who is not currently in the STHS program I will create and rate accordingly The reason I deleted all these players out of my simulator was to clean things up a bit and get all the guys out who haven't played in years and either retired or moved overseas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 Like I said when a player is drafted who is not currently in the STHS program I will create and rate accordingly The reason I deleted all these players out of my simulator was to clean things up a bit and get all the guys out who haven't played in years and either retired or moved overseas What about guys like Pronger and Ohlund? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted March 21, 2015 Share Posted March 21, 2015 What about guys like Pronger and Ohlund? I say don't bother. We're moving forward here. Create the guys that have played this year. Cause then he'll have to almost do that all over again for the ahl teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmen81 Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I can't wait to see Casey Baileys attributes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted March 22, 2015 Author Share Posted March 22, 2015 What about guys like Pronger and Ohlund? Like I said above the only players currently created have played in the NHL THIS SEASON and that is 853 (it may be more after tonight's games) and I do check this every night If a GM picks Pronger, Ohlund or any other player for that matter who have not played in the NHL THIS SEASON I will create and rate them accordingly To say it again if you choose to pick a player who hasn't played in the NHL THIS SEASON I will create and rate them accordingly This includes players Overseas, AHL, Canadian Leagues, etc.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj29 Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I know this is quite late of a reply on this subject, but I think speeding ahead and simming either 2 days or 3 days in one night is a good idea. With all the other leagues on CDC having following the NHL season as well, I think that some variety will be nice. This league, as long as I was here, was always starting a new season after the previous; I think that this should hold true through to the new STHS settings. That way, during summertime, we can have at least 1 league to look at, and also not having a day where your team doesn't play. For other leagues, we always have updates since we have different players from different teams, but in STHS, I suggest we follow our own schedule and sim more than once a day. Just an opinion since I liked how VC simmed scheduled the league previously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted March 24, 2015 Author Share Posted March 24, 2015 I want to try something different this time we will follow the 2015/16 NHL Schedule next season, if this doesn't work out we can switch things up next year Having the time off in the summer will give me that much needed time for ratings, draft and whatever else may come up I am also thinking of adjusting ratings at the end of each season based on their RL NHL/AHL or any other league statistics so all STHS is used for is the simming of games and behind the scenes stuff I need Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimLahey Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 Hopefully with the simming of one day at a time it will increase the interest with teams AHL clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted March 25, 2015 Author Share Posted March 25, 2015 CK (Checking) and DI (Discipline) have been completed There are still about 200 players left to delete who are listed in the unassigned players tab this will be done in the next couple of days Here is the link where you can check out the ratings remember only CK and DI have been re adjusted http://www.cdcsimleague.com/File/2015%20Pre-Season/CDCSI1-Unassigned.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted March 29, 2015 Author Share Posted March 29, 2015 What do you guys think of the ratings so far? Checking - According to the manual and the creator of STHS the higher the checking attribute the more said player will hit Discipline - According to the manual and the creator of STHS the higher the discipline rating the less penalties he will take Experience - According to the manual and the creator of STHS Experience helps with team morale as well as his own I have completed the above 3 attributes and this is how I came to those numbers Checking: I took the amount of hits over the last 2 seasons and averaged them out on a scale I created (first run) then I took the players time on ice per game and added or decreased the rating according to another scale I made. Discipline: I took the amount of PIMS over the last 2 seasons and averaged them out on a scale I created just like above. Then I took note of any player who received a Major, Misconduct, Game Misconduct and or Match penalty and decreased their attribute again on a scale I created Experience: I took the amount of Regular Season games a player has played over his career and came up with a rating from a scale I created. I then took the amount of Playoff games played over a career and added to the attribute according to the scale I made Faceoff: I am half done this attribute and the way I am determining a rating is I am taking the the amount of faceoffs won by a player over the last 2 seasons and again matching to a scale I created. Then I will go and readjust the rating depending on Faceoff % over the last 2 seasons Here is the link for the updated ratings so far http://www.cdcsimleague.com/File/2015%20Pre-Season/CDCSI1-Unassigned.html Let me know what you think and if you notice any glaring issues **Facoff attribute is not complete yet** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaManbeast Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I think that's an awesome and fair way of doing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.