RunningWild Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 source: random jabroni who posts on twitter A nice credible source ey. Gotta love twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 A nice credible source ey. Gotta love twitter. oh of course. everyone's an insider ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 wow thats crazy kane would solve our scoring woes hes a stud but also a douche but that trade done done and done we need a sniper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I know it's fake, but I can't believe Canuck fans are against the idea of it.. jeez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dion Phaneuf Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I'd be shocked if Gillis could pull this off. Fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 scoring has been our problem in last 3 yrs ever since we couldnt score versus bruins in finall we cant beat teams 2-1 all the time look tonight we finally scored 4 still lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I know it's fake, but I can't believe Canuck fans are against the idea of it.. jeez. Easily...Our defence has sucked as of late so why would we trade one of our 2 good reliable d? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 We aren't against this deal we are against them sending ONE player to winterpeg. I and numerous others have said take Tanev out and put Corrado or Edler in and we are good to go. I want E.Kane here like anyone else does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 More details coming in. Canucks offered Hansen, Tanev, 3rd rounder and Gaunce. Waiting for Jets reponse RT @harry1619: gaunce the prospect What do Imaginary Tom and Dick have to say about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksSayEh Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I would much rather swap Horvat for Gaunce than add Tanev. No way we should give him up, although im very keen on Kane. Edler should be the odd D out, move him elsewhere and flip the return if needed, even at a bit of a loss. KEEP TANEV! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Easily...Our defence has sucked as of late so why would we trade one of our 2 good reliable d? Besides the fact he is going to re-sign next season for more than the bargain contract he is currently on... "reliable" does not equate to "big 22 year old 30 goal scorer" that the team desperately needs. We have Stanton and Corrado next year for cheap "reliable" d-men. We have noone with 30 goal scoring winger potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Besides the fact he is going to re-sign next season for more than the bargain contract he is currently on... "reliable" does not equate to "big 22 year old 30 goal scorer" that the team desperately needs. We have Stanton and Corrado next year for cheap "reliable" d-men. We have noone with 30 goal scoring winger potential. Guess he better score more then 30 a year if your good with the way our defence has played the last few games with the game on the line in the final min Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 I would rather keep Tanev and trade Edler. To Van: Kane To Winterpeg: Edler Hansen Jensen 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragon4401 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 K‏@VancityJC CDC guys gonna have an aneurism over a rumor that's not even true lol Busted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Can we throw eggs or something at the guy that started the rumor ugg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Can we throw eggs or something at the guy that started the rumor ugg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatsPajamas Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 hmmm Mods are sleeping... sexy singles dating club 3 point oh? I think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Juice Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 True or not, Gillis isn't a dumb man to trade arguably the most consistent defenceman on the Canucks all season long. If anything, it would more or less hopefully look like this if this Evander Kane rumour comes to fruition. David Booth, Frank Corrado, Brendan Gaunce, 3rd, for Evander Kane. Throw in Hansen if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 lol ^ here, take our buyout, a 4-6 dman, a future 3c, and a 15-20% success rate type pick for your 22 year old first liner. Good chance they accept that right!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Ok, this rumor seems to be fake. But Botchford just dropped some news in the Provies tonight: Brendan Smith, Tomas Tatar, and Riley Sheahan for Edler That was apparently the offer. Glad he didn't take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.