*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Not but for real it's a 2 on 1 and Lack's literally on his ass. I'll find a highlight. It looked like he was expecting the 1 timer from St. Louis that was why he was down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 there is 5 other guys on a nightly basis playing just as bad all you got to back up your Edler hate is a plus/minus stat which is meaningless the only difference is the other guys have a partner or goalie to cover up their mistakes Edler doesn't get this benefit Either that or Edler's been so terrible that no partner can make up for his defensive play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fig Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 So we can finish with 89 pts max....Well Minny basically needs 1 pt, Stars 5 pts, Phx 5, 4 if they get the shootout win right now. When it's all said and done, the Canucks will miss the last playoff spot by 10 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Not but for real it's a 2 on 1 and Lack's literally on his ass. I'll find a highlight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Kenobi Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Well, post Luongo era is here. At least now we've finally shown that the problem wasn't him and that he was holding down the fort for the last two years. I agree - time to clean house. If the Sedin's won't take a paycut, ship them out for picks. 4 million each, max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHorvatBure Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spotted Zebra Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 so as of now, what is our draft position? 10th but other teams have games in hand I think well be 7/8 by the next game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thLineGrinder Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Not but for real it's a 2 on 1 and Lack's literally on his ass. I'll find a highlight. a better question is why is it a 2 on 1 during a 5 on 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Two shorthanded chances in the same powerplay. How anyone can be blaming Lack for any of this right now is ridiculous. This team has quit, what part of that do some people not get?haha not only that the rule is pretty clear that the goalie plays the shooter and the Ds job is to break up the pass.... not to mention it was only a 2 on 1 from rick nash to st louis .... not like they are big time players or anything i bet 99% of other goalies wouldve easily saved it hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Canucks need a clean house. AV made torts look like an ahl KHL coach that he is Usually I would just say 'bugger off', but that is superfluous here .. shine that knob, Lui .. it be yer only hope for redemption! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Well, post Luongo era is here. At least now we've finally shown that the problem wasn't him and that he was holding down the fort for the last two years. I agree - time to clean house. If the Sedin's won't take a paycut, ship them out for picks. 4 million each, max. This isn't the NFL. They CANT take a paycut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayinblack Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 should we even bother discussing this two 7 minute pp back to back games like come on has to be first in NHL history The 7 min 5 on 3 was the kicker. Don't think that'll ever happen again. And I still don't know how Hansen got his.... oh ha.... Devorski was mad at us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Magician Posted April 2, 2014 Author Share Posted April 2, 2014 Lol Oldnews what's wrong with you? Why do you reply with that when people post? That's the 10th one I've seen in 20 mins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ride the red Pony Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Well, good effort. Tough pass on that shorty........Was hoping the boys would best AV's squad tonight, but oh how the story goes. Burr possible suspension?? Controversy never ends, been a tough couple of seasons for the home team. And the big wheel keeps on turnin.G'night Nuck fans!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 a better question is why is it a 2 on 1 during a 5 on 4? Or a better question Why was there a breakaway and a 2 on 1 on the same PP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 so as of now, what is our draft position?does it really matter?? we will draft a guy that will turn out to be half the player detroit drafts in the 6th round anyways... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustapha Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Penalty assessed to #14 Alexandre Burrows. 5 minute major for a hit resulting in an injury to an opposing player. Rule 42.3 Major Penalty: A major penalty, at the discretion of the Referee, shall be imposed on any player who uses his elbow to foul an opponent. A major penalty must be imposed under this rule for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent (see 45.5). If the player is a member of the Vancouver Canucks, a major penalty will automatically be assessed without regard to the foul's severity or lack thereof. A game misconduct penalty may also be assessed if deemed necessary (known as the "Nathan Horton Clause") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Well, post Luongo era is here. At least now we've finally shown that the problem wasn't him and that he was holding down the fort for the last two years. I agree - time to clean house. If the Sedin's won't take a paycut, ship them out for picks. 4 million each, max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfruits Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 Either that or Edler's been so terrible that no partner can make up for his defensive play. look at the turnovers on this team and how many times Bieksa try's and play forward and fails or the lazy back check of Hamhuis and Garrison the only reason people single out Edler is his plus/minus when nobody other than Tanev has had a good season just him the rest have been inconsistent and terrible on a nightly basis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 haha not only that the rule is pretty clear that the goalie plays the shooter and the Ds job is to break up the pass.... not to mention it was only a 2 on 1 from rick nash to st louis .... not like they are big time players or anything i bet 99% of other goalies wouldve easily saved it hahaha Which is why I blamed Edler (the defenseman who did a good impression of a pylon), because it was HIS responsibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.