hammertime Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 With the Penguins straight up coming out and saying they will buy Fleury out if he's not traded and their obvious need for goaltending if they want to make another cup run I propose we trade. To Pitt - Miller 50% retained + Hansen To Van - MAF + Pouliot + 1st I know its a big ask but MAF fits our timeline and would be a good option to split starts with Markstrom until Demko is ready. MAF has negative value so they pay us to take him. In exchange they get Hansen on a sweet heart deal who will be a perfect fit for their team. Nux solidify their future D corps. Allowing JB to fully focus on building the fwd group. To Det- Edler To Van- Nyquist + 3rd Detroit is the best landing spot for Edler they have always had a soft spot for him and he them it seems they have been courting for years. Nyqvist has plateaued but is a very versatile middle 6 player who can add playmaking and goal scoring at any fwd position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukini Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 I don't think I do that first trade, I feel like Miller and Hansen can get more value elsewhere especially if you're retaining salary and defence isn't our primary concern right now. That Detroit deal is probably close to fair value but just personally not a huge fan of Nyquist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 I am not very high on Pouliot either. A forward prospect like Sprong or Guentzel fits the Canucks needs better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Goblin Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 IMO, Hansen alone could pull MAF (cap dump), D. Pouliot + 2nd. Then Miller for their 1st. Essentially, Hansen Miller (50% retained) for Fleury Pouliot 1st 2nd Then call up Subban and put him on the wing. I'd rather keep Edler for superb defense depth heading into the playoffs (hopefully). Then maybe give Grenier a chance as well since he has teared it up in the A. And finally send Megna down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Wtf is this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Detroit may have been interested in Edler 3 years ago but I don't see them having interest now. They're rebuilding as well now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Dont like it at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beeekz37 Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 I think we could do better for Miller and/or Hansen than what has been proposed. On the flip side, I don't think Edler will fetch as big a return as he would have at one time in his career. We are fairly stacked on defense prospects, need more scoring depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurt Nirvanagut Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 If Vancouver can manage a trade where Miller and someone/something goes to Pittsburgh for MAF and someone/something, I'd be all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.