Daniel+Henrik2237 Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 Sure we would like to have size, but Vegas speed really killed us. The Question is who stays and who goes . Ideally we need to shed cap space. Sutter- 4.375 Million Beagle- 3 Million Eriksson- 6 Million Ferland- 3.5 Million Pearson- 3.75 Million Toffoli- 4.6 Million Roussel- 3 Million Edler- 6 Million Myers- 6 Million So what does Benning do this off season with Toffoli, Markstrom, Demko, Tanev and our cap issues. Free Agents Dustin Byfuglein Alex Pietrangelo Taylor Hall Mikeal Granlund Justin Shultz Tyson Barrie Torey Krug Evgeni Dadonov Matt Martin Mike Hoffman Alex Galchenyuk Erik Gustafsson Pat Maroon Sami Vatenen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patel Bure Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 I would likely avoid free agency these next few years and just focus on shedding salary while re-upping our RFA’s. 1) Let Markstrom, Toffoli, Domingue, Fantenberg, and Leivo walk. 2) Unqualify Stecher 3) Trade Baertschi with 50% retention 4) Re-Sign Tanev 5) Re-sign Virtanen, Motte, and Gaudette. 6) Sign a guy like Thomas Greiss as a back-up to Demko 7) LTIR Ferland 8) Domingue off the books. I think doing all of the above would make us cap compliant for next season while still allowing us to be competitive. Miller-Pettersson-Boeser Pearson-Horvat-Eriksson (Podkolzin in April) Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Sutter Edler-Myers Hughes-Tanev Juolevi-Benn Rafferty Demko Greiss In the following off-season: 1) Tryamkin replaces Edler (if not Tryamkin, some other all situations left D via UFA). 2) Hoglander replaces Pearson. 3) Let Sutter walk. 4) Eriksson moved with a very small sweetener to a cap floor team (1 year left + only 2 million in real dollars left). If no one bites of Eriksson, pay him 2 million under the table to retire. 5) Let Jordie Benn walk 6) Spooner off the books. Here is one thing that I just noticed however: Demko will be an RFA next season. IF the Canucks commit to Demko and let Markstrom walk this year, it means that we will have to re-up Demko at the same time that we have to re-up both Hughes and Pettersson. . Anyways - if they find a way to do that, here is what the team could look like: Miller-Pettersson-Boeser Hoglander-Horvat-Podkolzin Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Lind Hughes-Myers Juolevi-Tanev Tryamkin-Rafferty Rathbone Demko [Greiss or Dipietro] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 (edited) I wish we could shed Sutter, Roussel, Beagle, Eriksson and Baer. Who knows about Ferland ( he should just retire). Pearson need to work on getting lean and faster, same with Toffoli. Need size with speed and we just dont have that. Maybe a sign and trade for Markstrom? Dadonov, Hoffman, Granlund depeding on price? Edited September 5, 2020 by Patrick Jane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 To van: Max domi To mtl: Roussel Brisebois 2021 2nd To van: 2021 2nd To njd: Tanner pearson To Van: Eeli tolvainen To Nsh: Jake virtanen Sign tanev Sign Domi Sign Wayne Simmonds Sign dadonov Sign crawford Sign motte Miller pettersson Boeser Domi horvat Dadonov Tolvainen Gaudette Simmonds Motte beagle macewen Edler Rafferty Hughes Tanev Rathbone Myers Demko Crawford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 22 minutes ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: To van: Max domi To mtl: Roussel Brisebois 2021 2nd To van: 2021 2nd To njd: Tanner pearson To Van: Eeli tolvainen To Nsh: Jake virtanen Sign tanev Sign Domi Sign Wayne Simmonds Sign dadonov Sign crawford Sign motte Miller pettersson Boeser Domi horvat Dadonov Tolvainen Gaudette Simmonds Motte beagle macewen Edler Rafferty Hughes Tanev Rathbone Myers Demko Crawford Montreal says eff no. A couple of borderline NHL players and a 2nd is not going to get a 25 year old C who put up 72 points last season (when he was actually used as a C with decent line mates.). Picking the two French players off the roster isn’t going to add any value to the deal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 We want to shed cap, there will be teams that want to shed salary. Let's see if GMJB can find a match. Match making time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 3 hours ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: To van: Max domi To mtl: Roussel Brisebois 2021 2nd To van: 2021 2nd To njd: Tanner pearson To Van: Eeli tolvainen To Nsh: Jake virtanen Sign tanev Sign Domi Sign Wayne Simmonds Sign dadonov Sign crawford Sign motte Miller pettersson Boeser Domi horvat Dadonov Tolvainen Gaudette Simmonds Motte beagle macewen Edler Rafferty Hughes Tanev Rathbone Myers Demko Crawford Poile complains about inconsistency and work ethic. Doubtful he'd see Virtanen as a solution. Just a few weeks ago he talked of how he thinks Tolvanen could be a fit playing with Duchene. Montreal was interested in Roussel at the time but were not willing to beat what the Canucks offered him. Insiders reported that he had a lot of suitors and Canucks had to overpay to get him as they were lower in the standings. It's a flat cap and after playing only 7:30 on average during this post-season and just running around not sure there will be many teams, if any, interested in him. Friedman was just saying that they are upset with Domi because of his lack of discipline and the dumb penalties he takes - Roussel does just that. NJD's beat writer Masisak says he doubts NJD would want to keep both Gusev/Palmieri because they re not in the age group of the core they are building around. Same would apply to Pearson. Simmonds has lost a lot of foot-speed. Great in the room by all reports but not sure he can hold a 3rd line role anymore. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Jane Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 I would Like this Eriksson, Sutter, Beagle, Roussel, Baer, Benn, Ferland (LTIR), Markstrom Out Markstrom( Rights), Eriksson, Olli Julevi for 4th round any team. No retaining in Eriksson contract. Sutter, Baer and Benn to Ott for 4th round pick Beagle, Roussel to NJ for 4th round pick Shed cap space. We wont get much Sign Toffoli 2 year 4 million Sign Hoffman 5 year 6.5 Million Sign Mikeal Granlund 1 Year 4 million Sign Matt Martin 1 year 2 Million Sign Tanev 3 year 5.5 Million Miller Petey Boeser Hoffman Horvat Toffoli Pearson Granlund Virtanen Motte Gaudette Martin Hughes Tanev Edler Myers Fantenberg Stecher Demko ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patel Bure Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, DarkIndianRises said: I would likely avoid free agency these next few years and just focus on shedding salary while re-upping our RFA’s. 1) Let Markstrom, Toffoli, Domingue, Fantenberg, and Leivo walk. 2) Unqualify Stecher 3) Trade Baertschi with 50% retention 4) Re-Sign Tanev 5) Re-sign Virtanen, Motte, and Gaudette. 6) Sign a guy like Thomas Greiss as a back-up to Demko 7) LTIR Ferland 8) Domingue off the books. I think doing all of the above would make us cap compliant for next season while still allowing us to be competitive. Miller-Pettersson-Boeser Pearson-Horvat-Eriksson (Podkolzin in April) Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Sutter Edler-Myers Hughes-Tanev Juolevi-Benn Rafferty Demko Greiss In the following off-season: 1) Tryamkin replaces Edler (if not Tryamkin, some other all situations left D via UFA). 2) Hoglander replaces Pearson. 3) Let Sutter walk. 4) Eriksson moved with a very small sweetener to a cap floor team (1 year left + only 2 million in real dollars left). If no one bites of Eriksson, pay him 2 million under the table to retire. 5) Let Jordie Benn walk 6) Spooner off the books. Here is one thing that I just noticed however: Demko will be an RFA next season. IF the Canucks commit to Demko and let Markstrom walk this year, it means that we will have to re-up Demko at the same time that we have to re-up both Hughes and Pettersson. . Anyways - if they find a way to do that, here is what the team could look like: Miller-Pettersson-Boeser Hoglander-Horvat-Podkolzin Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Lind Hughes-Myers Juolevi-Tanev Tryamkin-Rafferty Rathbone Demko [Greiss or Dipietro] One minor change to my above suggestion: Keep Toffoli and move Boeser for a 2020 1st + good prospect. Once you have done this, then move Eriksson right away via the “Marleau to Carolina deal” (Eriksson + 7th rounder + conditional 2021 1st for a 6th rounder). Next Season: (October until April) Miller-Pettersson-Toffoli Pearson-Horvat-Virtanen Motte-Gaudette-MacEwen Roussel-Beagle-Sutter Lind Edler-Myers Hughes-Tanev Juolevi-Benn Rafferty Demko VetBackUp April 2021 - Podkolzin joins Canucks Miller-Pettersson-Toffoli Pearson-Horvat-Podkolzin Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Sutter Edler-Myers Hughes-Tanev Juolevi-Benn Rafferty Demko VetBackUp 2021-2022: Miller-Pettersson-Toffoli Hoglander-Horvat-Podkolzin Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Lind Hughes-Myers Juolevi-Tanev Tryamkin-Rafferty Rathbone Demko [VetBackUp or Dipietro] More importantly however, the assets from a potential Boeser deal (2020 1st and/or the good prospect from the Boeser deal) could possibly factor in somehow to the above line-up. Alternatively, cap space permitting, you could elect to keep Pearson and move both Roussel and Beagle (50% retention each) if Hoglander wasn’t developed. Miller-Pettersson-Toffoli Pearson-Horvat-Podkolzin Motte-MacEwen-Virtanen Hoglander-Gaudette-Lind Edited September 6, 2020 by DarkIndianRises Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alienhuggyflow Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 13 hours ago, DarkIndianRises said: I would likely avoid free agency these next few years and just focus on shedding salary while re-upping our RFA’s. 1) Let Markstrom, Toffoli, Domingue, Fantenberg, and Leivo walk. 2) Unqualify Stecher 3) Trade Baertschi with 50% retention 4) Re-Sign Tanev 5) Re-sign Virtanen, Motte, and Gaudette. 6) Sign a guy like Thomas Greiss as a back-up to Demko 7) LTIR Ferland 8) Domingue off the books. I think doing all of the above would make us cap compliant for next season while still allowing us to be competitive. Miller-Pettersson-Boeser Pearson-Horvat-Eriksson (Podkolzin in April) Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Sutter Edler-Myers Hughes-Tanev Juolevi-Benn Rafferty Demko Greiss In the following off-season: 1) Tryamkin replaces Edler (if not Tryamkin, some other all situations left D via UFA). 2) Hoglander replaces Pearson. 3) Let Sutter walk. 4) Eriksson moved with a very small sweetener to a cap floor team (1 year left + only 2 million in real dollars left). If no one bites of Eriksson, pay him 2 million under the table to retire. 5) Let Jordie Benn walk 6) Spooner off the books. Here is one thing that I just noticed however: Demko will be an RFA next season. IF the Canucks commit to Demko and let Markstrom walk this year, it means that we will have to re-up Demko at the same time that we have to re-up both Hughes and Pettersson. . Anyways - if they find a way to do that, here is what the team could look like: Miller-Pettersson-Boeser Hoglander-Horvat-Podkolzin Motte-Gaudette-Virtanen Roussel-Beagle-MacEwen Lind Hughes-Myers Juolevi-Tanev Tryamkin-Rafferty Rathbone Demko [Greiss or Dipietro] You realize by making the moves you mentioned creates around 26 million right? The players you signed adds up to 12 million at most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patel Bure Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Alienhuggyflow said: You realize by making the moves you mentioned creates around 26 million right? The players you signed adds up to 12 million at most. I’m taking into account the season after next as well where we would have to re-up Pettersson, Hughes, and Demko. Perhaps I’m missing something? I’d be interested in seeing your math if possible. Edited September 6, 2020 by DarkIndianRises Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alienhuggyflow Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 Just now, DarkIndianRises said: I’m taking into account the season after next as well where we would have to re-up Pettersson, Hughes, and Demko. Perhaps I’m missing something? I’d be interested in seeing your math if possible. If we LTIR ferland and pay half of Baers contract plus Stech off the books and the other moves adds to about 26 million After next season Sutter, Pearson, Edler, Benn for around 17 million. So even if we use the entire 26 million this season, next season those 4 contracts should be filled internally with Podz, Hogs, Rathbone and Joulevi and Woo hopefully. So that leaves around 14 million for Hughes and Petey, I think Benning locks them both up long-term so he's going to need -2-3 million extra maybe? Either way with so many scenarios, it's gonna be interesting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Alienhuggyflow said: If we LTIR ferland and pay half of Baers contract plus Stech off the books and the other moves adds to about 26 million After next season Sutter, Pearson, Edler, Benn for around 17 million. So even if we use the entire 26 million this season, next season those 4 contracts should be filled internally with Podz, Hogs, Rathbone and Joulevi and Woo hopefully. So that leaves around 14 million for Hughes and Petey, I think Benning locks them both up long-term so he's going to need -2-3 million extra maybe? Either way with so many scenarios, it's gonna be interesting. LTIR does not just come off the books. The team might not want to use the full 3.5M of Ferland or they wouldn't be able to recall players or add anyone mid-season (eg Podkolzin). Cap space is accounted for differently under LTIR and actually limits a team's flexibility and makes it more challenging to build an active roster up to the salary cap. It creates recall issues in particular for ELC players with performance bonuses. Benning might try and move his contract if he really can't play anymore. There might not be any takers as it's difficult to work around LTIR and he has 3 more years. It's also unclear if his contract is insured. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 2 hours ago, mll said: LTIR does not just come off the books. The team might not want to use the full 3.5M of Ferland or they wouldn't be able to recall players or add anyone mid-season (eg Podkolzin). Cap space is accounted for differently under LTIR and actually limits a team's flexibility and makes it more challenging to build an active roster up to the salary cap. It creates recall issues in particular for ELC players with performance bonuses. Benning might try and move his contract if he really can't play anymore. There might not be any takers as it's difficult to work around LTIR and he has 3 more years. It's also unclear if his contract is insured. Ottawa won't have trouble reaching the floor. It doesn't mean they won't try to engineer them be a floor team this year. I realize its a long shot but they could do it such that Loui is their last 6 mil or so to reach the floor, saving Melnyk a lot of dough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 5 minutes ago, Robert Long said: Ottawa won't have trouble reaching the floor. It doesn't mean they won't try to engineer them be a floor team this year. I realize its a long shot but they could do it such that Loui is their last 6 mil or so to reach the floor, saving Melnyk a lot of dough. or they could just go to Arizona and take the Hossa contract. It's only 200K in real cash and Arizona doesn't need it to reach the floor. Eriksson costs 5M in real cash for 2 seasons. There are simply more efficient ways to spend that money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 4 minutes ago, mll said: or they could just go to Arizona and take the Hossa contract. It's only 200K in real cash and Arizona doesn't need it to reach the floor. Eriksson costs 5M in real cash for 2 seasons. There are simply more efficient ways to spend that money. but as you point out, LTIR limits other options, and they likey don't get a prospect or a pick of good quality either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Robert Long said: but as you point out, LTIR limits other options, and they likey don't get a prospect or a pick of good quality either. Ottawa will be above the floor but below the cap. LTIR wouldn't impact them unless they get close to the ceiling. As long as they don't need the relief they can just keep the player on IR and function like any other team. LTIR is problematic when teams are at the cap and need the relief. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patel Bure Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 5 hours ago, mll said: LTIR does not just come off the books. The team might not want to use the full 3.5M of Ferland or they wouldn't be able to recall players or add anyone mid-season (eg Podkolzin). Cap space is accounted for differently under LTIR and actually limits a team's flexibility and makes it more challenging to build an active roster up to the salary cap. It creates recall issues in particular for ELC players with performance bonuses. Benning might try and move his contract if he really can't play anymore. There might not be any takers as it's difficult to work around LTIR and he has 3 more years. It's also unclear if his contract is insured. In light of Demko’s recent performance, I’m wondering if Demko as a sweetener would get rid of both Eriksson and Ferland in its entirety (we’d take a one year contract back so that our trading partner could accommodate both Eriksson and Ferland). Hopefully, Ferland just retires and the Canucks give him a front office job of some kind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Ward Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 Van Gaborik 4.75 cap hit i think Ottawa Stecher 3+ million Eriksson 6 million We get a lower cap hit and for only 1 year. Ottawa gets a younger right shot dman coming into his prime who won't be too expensive. They have the space for Eriksson for the next 2 years. He will also provide some veteran penalty killing and will have much less pressure on him. We save between 4-5 million. Re-sign Tanev 3 years 4.5 million. We sign Toffoli. Rafferty, Juolevi, Brisebois, etc. Take stechers minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Dixon Ward said: Van Gaborik 4.75 cap hit i think Ottawa Stecher 3+ million Eriksson 6 million We get a lower cap hit and for only 1 year. Ottawa gets a younger right shot dman coming into his prime who won't be too expensive. They have the space for Eriksson for the next 2 years. He will also provide some veteran penalty killing and will have much less pressure on him. We save between 4-5 million. Re-sign Tanev 3 years 4.5 million. We sign Toffoli. Rafferty, Juolevi, Brisebois, etc. Take stechers minutes. Gaborik's contract is insured. He is on LTIR and helps them reach the floor. Can't see Melnyk moving out a contract that helps him save considerable money so that he can spend more than he has to. There's probably a more efficient way to use up 9M in cap space. Edited September 6, 2020 by mll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now