Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

My dream :( [Discussion]


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

Why would a team picking 1st OA trade it away for one year of Miller? 

kind of wondering the same thing when looking at the Brock proposals

I think unless its a sign and trade, Brock is worth a 3rd

Erhoff garnered us a 4th, so maybe a 4th

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, qwijibo said:

Why would a team picking 1st OA trade it away for one year of Miller? 

I would assume that any team trading for Miller (don't think we should trade him), would make it contingent to having an agreement for an extension. Again, trading Miller was not my suggestion, it was the OP asking if trading him would get us into the top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lmm said:

 

I think unless its a sign and trade, Brock is worth a 3rd

Erhoff garnered us a 4th, so maybe a 4th

Copp got Wpg quite a bit more than that and he's essentially a pure rental.  I think Allvin could do better than a 3rd or 4th for BB.   Say what you want about his upcoming contract,  but the fact is in any regular length season,  Brock is a perennial 20+ goal scorer,  that's higher value than a mid round pick imo.

  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fanuck said:

Copp got Wpg quite a bit more than that and he's essentially a pure rental.  I think Allvin could do better than a 3rd or 4th for BB.   Say what you want about his upcoming contract,  but the fact is in any regular length season,  Brock is a perennial 20+ goal scorer,  that's higher value than a mid round pick imo.

but Rental season is over

If Brock was traded last deadline, sure he'd have brought more

but because of his QO price Brock is essentially a UFA, (that is unqualified RFA = UFA)

the Canucks could afford to wait on Miller because he has a year left

not trading Brock was the "miss" of Alvin's first TDL day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LTC123 said:

What IF:::    we moved DOWN in the draft?  #15 + Miller to (Tampa, NYR, COL)    For??

 

 

how many times has that actually worked?

I always think of this deal when thinking about trading down

 

I guess it worked for NJ, but can you think of any other time it worked out?

 

Side note, man picking goalies is tough, Calgary pick Kidd and his 4.15 GGG over Marty and his 4.01 GG in the first round

I guess Lou knew something about something

 

Trevor Kidd

Goalie
Born Mar 26 1972 -- Dugald, MAN
[50 yrs. ago]
Height 6.02 -- Weight 190 [188 cm/86 kg]
Drafted by Calgary Flames
- round 1 #11 overall 1990 NHL Entry Draft
  
Trevor Kidd hockey player photo 
Player trades [notes]
  • 1990-Jun-16 Draft pick rights traded from New Jersey Devils with round 2 pick in the 1990 draft (Vesa Viitakoski) to Calgary Flames for round 1 pick in the 1990 draft (Martin Brodeur), round 2 pick in the 1990 draft (Chris Gotziaman) and round 2 pick in the 1990 draft (David Harlock)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lmm said:

but Rental season is over

If Brock was traded last deadline, sure he'd have brought more

but because of his QO price Brock is essentially a UFA, (that is unqualified RFA = UFA)

the Canucks could afford to wait on Miller because he has a year left

not trading Brock was the "miss" of Alvin's first TDL day

Worst case scenario, they just qualify him and have his rights for another year (I believe that's how it works).  Then under your scenario he'd still bring more in return as a rental at the next deadline (like Copp).  If everything everyone says is true, and I've heard this a lot when Allvin was announced as the GM, he (Allvin) is an incredibly smart person who is capable of 'thinking outside the box', that's one of the reasons JR liked him - he likely has several scenarios he can fall back on with regards of what to do with Miller/BB/Garland/Myers/etc....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fanuck said:

Worst case scenario, they just qualify him and have his rights for another year (I believe that's how it works).  Then under your scenario he'd still bring more in return as a rental at the next deadline (like Copp).  If everything everyone says is true, and I've heard this a lot when Allvin was announced as the GM, he (Allvin) is an incredibly smart person who is capable of 'thinking outside the box', that's one of the reasons JR liked him - he likely has several scenarios he can fall back on with regards of what to do with Miller/BB/Garland/Myers/etc....

you don't simply qualify.

by qualifying you are offering a salary of $7.5million

that is real money and cap

Boeser is currently capped at $5.875, that is $1.6M less than $7.5

where does that cap money come from?

and then there is the small problem of explaining to Miller, Horvat and Pettersson why you pay Brock more than them

" Hey boy, we'd reallly like it if you'd give us a nice friendly discount, cuz, you know we kind of spent heavy on the Brockstar"

 

It will be interesting to see how the management get out of this one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lmm said:

you don't simply qualify.

by qualifying you are offering a salary of $7.5million

that is real money and cap

Boeser is currently capped at $5.875, that is $1.6M less than $7.5

where does that cap money come from?

and then there is the small problem of explaining to Miller, Horvat and Pettersson why you pay Brock more than them

" Hey boy, we'd reallly like it if you'd give us a nice friendly discount, cuz, you know we kind of spent heavy on the Brockstar"

 

It will be interesting to see how the management get out of this one

Allvin can qualify Boeser if he wants to retain his rights, that'll give him time to work out the cap-implications.

I see Miller and at least one of either BB or Garland traded (maybe even a D-man, Pool/Myers) this off-season or before the next TDL so there's potential to create the elusive 'cap-flexibility' Allvin and JR have been referring to so often.  Additionally, it's clear with the example of the Hamonic trade that there are other options to create cap-flexibility if/when necessary - in that situation Allvin essentially halved the cap hit from Hamonic and replaced it with a comparatively competent player.  I don't see having to explain to Miller or anyone else why he takes a 'friendly discount' as I don't see Miller (or BB at that QO cost anyway) here long-term anyway.  

 

I agree it will be interesting to see what Allvin does, but I think he has a lot more options than people think he does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kanucks25 said:

Save some for the rest of us, my dude.

 

Also do you provide lessons on how to be cool & radical?

there are millions of beautiful women in this world

and I am extremely happy with one of them

 

live long enough to not take yourself seriously

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fanuck said:

Allvin can qualify Boeser if he wants to retain his rights, that'll give him time to work out the cap-implications.

I see Miller and at least one of either BB or Garland traded (maybe even a D-man, Pool/Myers) this off-season or before the next TDL so there's potential to create the elusive 'cap-flexibility' Allvin and JR have been referring to so often.  Additionally, it's clear with the example of the Hamonic trade that there are other options to create cap-flexibility if/when necessary - in that situation Allvin essentially halved the cap hit from Hamonic and replaced it with a comparatively competent player.  I don't see having to explain to Miller or anyone else why he takes a 'friendly discount' as I don't see Miller (or BB at that QO cost anyway) here long-term anyway.  

 

I agree it will be interesting to see what Allvin does, but I think he has a lot more options than people think he does. 

Maybe MLL can chime in on this, but as I understand it

once the offer is there, Brock can just sign it

then he is the highest paid forward on the team but not  the best forward

sure Alvin can try and maybe actually barter Brock down, but he gives up a lot of leverage

If Brock is signed at $7.5 and I am Horvat's agent, I am looking at $10

It is basic trickle up economics

 

the one great hope with the new management team is that the salary structure makes more sense than it did when Loui E was the highest paid player on the team

 

the Hamonic deal was a good one, but many in the Vancouver-Ottawa and greater hockey world did not understand it

I wouldn't count on that happening again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Boeser's agent and Allvin have been talking. Could be that management says "We can offer Brock $6.75 over X years, and if he declines, then we'll need to re-sign and move him due to cap constraints".  It would be up to Brock whether he continues to play in VAN. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lmm said:

you don't simply qualify.

by qualifying you are offering a salary of $7.5million

that is real money and cap

Boeser is currently capped at $5.875, that is $1.6M less than $7.5

where does that cap money come from?

and then there is the small problem of explaining to Miller, Horvat and Pettersson why you pay Brock more than them

" Hey boy, we'd reallly like it if you'd give us a nice friendly discount, cuz, you know we kind of spent heavy on the Brockstar"

 

It will be interesting to see how the management get out of this one

Imm

 

I am having a little problem with your thinking here....................

 

Boeser stats are not............I repeat not in any area of 7.00 or higher................no where near

 

Yes, his qualifying offer is 7.5 million, but that is high for his production, if it was, he would be worth it ( go figure)

 

And you miss the fact that with Covid the cap has been relatively flat, but at the time of his last contract that was not the case.

 

In fact, there was a large TV deal on the table, and Cap was expected to move up at a rate of at least 4 million per

 

That did not happen and the players, the agents, and the GM's are all aware of that

 

Boeser's next contract will again be a 3 year deal (IMHO) and it will be in the 6.2350 to 6.5 million range, max.

 

His point totals do not warrant anymore than that, whether he signs here or somewhere else............

 

Compare his production and impact to Pettersson's and Hughes, and it is not even close

 

You also rule out a sign and trade, or a sign and trade with retention............

 

If we go with the assumption that our new GM and President are smart, they would never trade him for what you suggest

 

 

Edited by J.I.A.H.N
  • Huggy Bear 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, J.I.A.H.N said:

Imm

 

I am having a little problem with your thinking here....................

 

Boeser stats are not............I repeat not in any area of 7.00 or higher................no where near

 

Yes, his qualifying offer is 7.5 million, but that is high for his production, if it was, he would be worth it ( go figure)

 

And you miss the fact that with Covid the cap has been relatively flat, but at the time of his last contract that was not the case.

 

In fact, there was a large TV deal on the table, and Cap was expected to move up at a rate of at least 4 million per

 

That did not happen and the players, the agents, and the GM's are all aware of that

 

Boeser's next contract will again be a 3 year deal (IMHO) and it will be in the 6.2350 to 6.5 million range, max.

 

His point totals do not warrant anymore than that, whether he signs here or somewhere else............

 

Compare his production and impact to Pettersson's and Hughes, and it is not even close

 

You also rule out a sign and trade, or a sign and trade with retention............

 

If we go with the assumption that our new GM and President are smart, they would never trade him for what you suggest

 

 

I'll say you are having trouble understanding me

because 

we are saying almost the exact same thing

except for the bolded

I think that is just you making stuff up

He is not worth $6.5 imo

  • Huggy Bear 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lmm said:

I'll say you are having trouble understanding me

because 

we are saying almost the exact same thing

except for the bolded

I think that is just you making stuff up

He is not worth $6.5 imo

Maybe I am misunderstanding you, then

Because I thought you said his value was a 3 or 4th round pick

Which I feel is rediculous. As I feel he can be signed and traded for much more

6.25 for a player who plays 1/2 PP unit and 1/2 line is usually worth

close to the 6.25/6.50 area, and I think Brock will get a raise, but

I think he will be given another show me contract

They will not let him just walk........no way

Maybe I go you wrong, and if I do, I apologize 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

No more boy meets girl...boy loses girl.

More like man tries to understand what the hell went wrong!

 

 

that was awesome

I remember it from back in the day

but enjoyed that like it was my first time

truth is though it reminded me of my kid

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, J.I.A.H.N said:

Maybe I am misunderstanding you, then

Because I thought you said his value was a 3 or 4th round pick

Which I feel is rediculous. As I feel he can be signed and traded for much more

6.25 for a player who plays 1/2 PP unit and 1/2 line is usually worth

close to the 6.25/6.50 area, and I think Brock will get a raise, but

I think he will be given another show me contract

They will not let him just walk........no way

Maybe I go you wrong, and if I do, I apologize 

I said in an earlier post that the only way I see getting more for Brock is a sign and trade

 

but I don't see a 19 goal scorer being worth what you are suggesting

and with his high QO, he holds the cards

 

He could, ( as Ibach has suggested for months, or maybe it was Awalk) take less

But he can also choose to walk

and there is nothing short of offering him $7.5 the Canucks can do about it

 

so how do you say "They will not just let him walk... no way"

what have you got to back that up? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...