ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 good thing he's back on the first line. he wasn't looking to good without the sisters. 5 years later..... Funny your actually happy that Burrows is still here, and even if it's when he is playing with the Sedins in your opinion, and you wanted Burrows gone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 (edited) 5 years later..... Funny your actually happy that Burrows is still here, and even if it's when he is playing with the Sedins in your opinion, and you wanted Burrows gone... That's not the same clutch - I know it's hard to imagine but the original one was banned as "clutch". This person's name looks like clutch but it is spelled something like 'c|utch'. The real clutch got exiled real quick. He made a thread that backfired on him so badly. There was another guy that bashed Grabner and a day later, Grabner potted a hat-trick. LOL. Edited February 22, 2013 by Dazzle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 good thing he's back on the first line. he wasn't looking to good without the sisters. OMG, the real clutch is back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gumballthechewy Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 OMG, the real clutch is back? No no, it's just imposter clutch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 No no, it's just imposter clutch. Nope, if you go back last page you see it's the real clutch that created this thread (the post I quoted). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 Nope, if you go back last page you see it's the real clutch that created this thread (the post I quoted). Yup, must definitely the real clutch. For anyone that doesn't believe VC, just look at clutch's rep in the previous post. No one in CDC has that many minuses except the real deal (could also check the day the account was created). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*VaNcOuVeRCaNuCkS* Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 LP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gumballthechewy Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 (edited) Nope, if you go back last page you see it's the real clutch that created this thread (the post I quoted). Holy tuna fish batman!! It really is!!!!! Who'd a thunk he'd have the balls? Imposter clutch is even using the same picture!? What a tool.... Yup, must definitely the real clutch. For anyone that doesn't believe VC, just look at clutch's rep in the previous post. No one in CDC has that many minuses except the real deal (could also check the day the account was created). Yeah, they have the same picture, that's what fooled me. Edited February 22, 2013 by Gumballthechewy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 Love Hansen's reaction to hossa possibly playing next game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt kilgore Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 Nope, if you go back last page you see it's the real clutch that created this thread (the post I quoted). OK, this is very confusing. It seems like there are two accounts for "clutch". If you go to the profile of this poster: how do you define fame? You get this profile with a +505 rating http://forum.canucks...r/91064-ciutch/ Yet when you use this post: good thing he's back on the first line. he wasn't looking to good without the sisters. You get this profile with a -1327 rating: http://forum.canucks...r/31963-clutch/ I didn't think this board allowed two identical handles. Its like one is the original and one is a charlatan. Or clutch has started two accounts and flips back and forth? Like Jeckle and Hyde. It would be good if a moderator would explain. Also clutch (Hyde), 2001 called, nice... calling the Sedins "the sisters".... trying a little too hard to troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gumballthechewy Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 OK, this is very confusing. It seems like there are two accounts for "clutch". If you go to the profile of this poster: You get this profile with a +505 rating http://forum.canucks...r/91064-ciutch/ Yet when you use this post: You get this profile with a -1327 rating: http://forum.canucks...r/31963-clutch/ I didn't think this board allowed two identical handles. Its like one is the original and one is a charlatan. Or clutch has started two accounts and flips back and forth? Like Jeckle and Hyde. It would be good if a moderator would explain. Also clutch (Hyde), 2001 called, nice... calling the Sedins "the sisters".... trying a little too hard to troll. The -1327 clutch is the Grand Master of the Troll Order the other is an imposter using the name cIutch with a capital "i" in place of a lower case l (L). Why he's using the name and identical picture is beyond me. Personally I think he's a troll who idolises the original clutch and wants to emulate his hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cIutch Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) How do you? Tell me why you'd take on a poison handle like that? Whenever you post half the people think you're the biggest idiot in CDC history, and the other half just think you're being a little richard. Its like changing your name to Hitler and moving into a Jewish neighbourhood. I don't get it. Unless........this actually is the original clutch and your playing a 3 dimensional chess game on us all. I will say that this is definitely the most IRONIC thread on this board. The first word that most Canuck fans would use in describing Alex Burrows is the same name as the handle that started this thread. OK, this is very confusing. It seems like there are two accounts for "clutch". If you go to the profile of this poster: You get this profile with a +505 rating http://forum.canucks...r/91064-ciutch/ Yet when you use this post: You get this profile with a -1327 rating: http://forum.canucks...r/31963-clutch/ I didn't think this board allowed two identical handles. Its like one is the original and one is a charlatan. Or clutch has started two accounts and flips back and forth? Like Jeckle and Hyde. It would be good if a moderator would explain. Also clutch (Hyde), 2001 called, nice... calling the Sedins "the sisters".... trying a little too hard to troll. edit my name is ciutch bro are you really that stupid? Edited February 23, 2013 by cIutch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cIutch Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) The -1327 clutch is the Grand Master of the Troll Order the other is an imposter using the name cIutch with a capital "i" in place of a lower case l (L). Why he's using the name and identical picture is beyond me. Personally I think he's a troll who idolises the original clutch and wants to emulate his hero. its just like mind blowing isnt it? craziest thing ever probably Edited February 23, 2013 by cIutch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gumballthechewy Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) its just like mind blowing isnt it? craziest thing ever probably It's nither mind blowing nor crazy, more like incredibly stupid. Actually, yeah, it is pretty crazy, idolising the biggest troll on CDC. Edited February 23, 2013 by Gumballthechewy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt kilgore Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 edit my name is ciutch bro are you really that stupid? Did I say your name wasn't? Ok, so now we get to the bottom, and I do mean bottom. There's only one thing more assinine than the original clutch,...... who still thinks its funny to call the Sedins "the sisters" but who I'd give a tiny mulligan to because he did start this thread just as Alex was establishing himself......and that's a clutch groupie wannabe who seems to have the same smarmy mouth on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckNORRIS4Cup Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) That's not the same clutch - I know it's hard to imagine but the original one was banned as "clutch". This person's name looks like clutch but it is spelled something like 'c|utch'. The real clutch got exiled real quick. He made a thread that backfired on him so badly. There was another guy that bashed Grabner and a day later, Grabner potted a hat-trick. LOL. Well that's what I was reading from others here, but I don't think that's true, I did some research before I posted too clutch. Go back to the first page of this topic, click on clutch's profile the OP who started this topic, now when your on his profile click on posts under their profile picture. It will show their posts, it shows that clutch posted on feb 19th of 2013 with the OPs profile. It makes sense if he was originally banned or suspended for a lengthy time, but it shows the clutch who started this topic back in 2008, made a post in this topic on the 19th 2013, which means he is back, it can't be someone else. (Real)Profile for OP who started this topic 1st clutch --> http://forum.canucks...r/31963-clutch/ (Check last post date made) (Fake)Profile of the other person who is using cIutch --> http://forum.canucks...r/91064-ciutch/ Edited February 23, 2013 by ChuckNORRIS4Cup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Yeah the real Clutch actually posted haha, finally got to 100 posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Burr's hard work in front of the net is something to behold. He takes SO much punishment in the form of slashes, whacks behind the legs, crosschecks, etc. but just circles around and gets right back in there. This aspect of his game doesn't get nearly enough praise. Anyone questioning his toughness need only watch some of this stuff to see he's tough as nails. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mookie Wilson Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) I know allot of people are going to scorch me for this but I fail to see the reason why nobody questions his ability to play in the nhl. Every game i watch with him in the lineup(all of them) I find myself screaming at the tv because of the stupid stuff the guy does. Personally i'd rather have any of the guys that are fighting for a spot on the team rather than burrows. Everyone's #1 reason they like this guy from what I read on this forum "He's great on the pk. Who cares! Anyone can do this thats fighting for a spot. He can't score and i'm tired of kesler carrying this guy on his back night after night, I'm tired of him losing the puck, falling down everywhere seriously this guy falls down a hundred times a night can't he skate its ridiculous, stupid penalties its endless. "He plays with grit" is another common description tossed out when his name comes up. That ok sure he pisses off guys but fails to do really be able finish that job off by being able to fight because he can't. IMOP he's an embarrassment to the team. Please Gillis let this guy go keep Krog or Pettinger or Brown whoever. let er rip. This. +1 EDIT: lp. Edited February 23, 2013 by Mookie Wilson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) Burr's hard work in front of the net is something to behold. He takes SO much punishment in the form of slashes, whacks behind the legs, crosschecks, etc. but just circles around and gets right back in there. This aspect of his game doesn't get nearly enough praise. Anyone questioning his toughness need only watch some of this stuff to see he's tough as nails. I was just going to say this, as well as comment on the beating that our 1st line takes almost every shift. The top line puck possession game is probably the most physically taxing style of play around. They are constantly getting pounded into the boards or pushed to the ice by the best defensive players in the league. And on top of that, they are in such good condition that they rarely get injuries. Anyone who call the Sedins 'soft' isn't watching the game. And those of you still calling them 'the sisters' just f*** right off and go cheer for another team. We don't want you around here. Edited February 23, 2013 by higgyfan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now