• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Pears

(Proposal) Vancouver-Florida (another one)

Recommended Posts

Someone else posted a proposal similar to the one I'm thinking about. Tallon apparently wants either Hansen or Edler, here is a slight modification of it

To Vancouver: Quinton Howden + Nick Bjugstad + 2013 1st

To Florida: Roberto Luongo + Jordan Schroeder + Chris Tanev + 2014 1st

What our line up could look like for 2013-14:

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows

Doan - Kesler - Booth

Huberdeau - Bjugstad - Kassian

Higgins - Lapierre - Volpatti

Edler - Garrison

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Ballard - Connauton

Schneider

Lack

There is a plus side to this trade for both teams. The next two draft years are supposed to be great, so Vancouver gets two solid 1st round picks this year and Florida gets none. Then in 2014, Florida gets two 1st rounders and Vancouver has none. Sort of evens it out a little more. Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, in my opinion Huberdeau is a non-starter. Any mention of his name and Tallon hangs up the phone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, in my opinion Huberdeau is a non-starter. Any mention of his name and Tallon hangs up the phone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Florida throws away their whole farm. Just doesn't make any sense at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tallon assumes Gillis is playing a sick joke on him, and hangs up the phone.

Massive underpayment on our part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That package could get us Bjugstad,1st rd pick and Petrovic if we are just trading strictly for the future. None of Florida's roster players really stands out to me besides Weiss but even he might not be a game changer in our line-up.

I'd stick with Bjugstad and a 1st and work from there. If we get anything extra, I'd ship those extra pieces over to St.Louis in a deal for Berglund

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luongo alone won't get Huberdeau I know, but with Hansen, Tanev, and a '14 1st included he might consider it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Huberbeau is worth what we would have to pay.

And I'm certainly not okay with giving away are two best/most developed prospects.

Since what we will have to give will be too much, just hold onto Tanev and Schroeder and forget about Huberbeau, there's no chance we get him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luongo alone isn't getting Bjugstad so far, so why would Hansen, Tanev and a '14 1st (almost forgot Schroeder) allow us to add on Huberdeau and their '13 1st? You're trading depth - albeit good depth - for a potential 1st line elite centerman and asking for their other best center prospect in Bjugstad. They might have depth now, but leaving them with Grimaldi and Howden doesn't make up for only giving them bottom 6/bottom 4 players in positions they already have covered with the likes of Upshall, Mueller, Parros, Skille, Gudbranson, Weaver, Petrovic, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huberdeau is literally untouchable. They won't trade their future #1 centerman for anything that we can realistically offer them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do something like

Luongo + Edler + Schroeder + 4th

for

Campbell + Huberdeau

Higgins-Huberdeau-Hansen triple H line again!

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Campbell-Garrison

Ballard-Tanev

Luongo = Campbell

Edler + Schroeder + 4th = Huberdeau

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Swap Huberdeau with Howden and take out Hansen from our end?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do something like

Luongo + Edler + Schroeder + 4th

for

Campbell + Huberdeau

Higgins-Huberdeau-Hansen triple H line again!

Hamhuis-Bieksa

Campbell-Garrison

Ballard-Tanev

Luongo = Campbell

Edler + Schroeder + 4th = Huberdeau

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not necessarily underpayment but more so they just don't want to trade Huberdeau regardless of what you throw at them. Unless it's a young premier player in the game, don't bother include Huberdeau in proposals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luongo and Edler for Campbell and Huberdeau/Gudbranson?

The Canucks take a big salary in return for Luongo's but also get a great young player. We know Campbell plays well with Garrison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.