• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

vancanfan

(Report) Sabres Luke Adam on the block?

42 posts in this topic

Drafted 44th overall in 2008 by Buffalo

No invite to training camp.

If he can produce with Pominville and Vanek surely he can be a good fit at second line center and at a good price.

Just because it didn't work in Buffalo doesn't mean he can't be somebody's player in the NHL. Last season, Adam was second on the Sabres in goals scored per 60 minutes to only Tyler Ennis. He can produce.

More or less, Adam and the Sabres have gone as far as they can go with each other. He believes he's an NHL player and they would, apparently, rather sign a player such as Jochen Hecht than even give him another sniff.

It's time for the Sabres to do what they should have done at the trade deadline last year and deal Adam to a team that can use him. Some teams play systems in which offensive and defensive players are used in specified roles. It's realistic to think he could fit in with one of those teams.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they allready have issues on the center position with some players out..thought they would use him

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're all to aware that reports of weak skating can be exaggerations or not really issues, but I'm not so certain he'd be a specific improvement over who we have in the system now.

Buffalo certainly has options, and they must feel those are better than Adam. Ennis, Hodgson, Grigorenko, Hecht, etc. all vying for top 6/top 9, so I can see why they wouldn't want to keep him around a camp as a 4th or 5th option in the top 6 but not really an option in the bottom 6.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're all to aware that reports of weak skating can be exaggerations or not really issues, but I'm not so certain he'd be a specific improvement over who we have in the system now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take him over Raymond in a heartbeat on the second line, he will go in front of the net and fight for the puck, plus he can score, has size and talent.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's an NHL calibre player, and if Buffalo isn't going to give him a chance they need to move him.

I'm sure they would get more than a few decent offers for him.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read that the reason he wasn't invited was due to poor defensive play and general laziness at both ends of the ice. I'd rather take a chance with MayRay.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember him getting a lot of points with Vanek and Pominville. Anyone know why he was taken off their line?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember him getting a lot of points with Vanek and Pominville. Anyone know why he was taken off their line?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luke Adam - 13 goals, 11 assists in 71 games in the NHL, drafted 44th overall in 2008.

Cody Hodgson - 20 goals, 21 assists in 91 games in the NHL, drafted 10th overall in 2008

Still a young kid, might be disgruntled from being pulled off that top line in Buffalo, was rookie of the year in the AHL, put up some awesome numbers. I like the fact he is big and uses his size, unlike Raymond.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he was good when he played in the WJC. He would look good in 3rd/4th line role here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth... Sabres fans hate Adam. Say he plays soft and is a turnover king.

Positives: Parks well in front of the net, and good at getting pucks in the corners.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you guys give up Schroeder in exchange for Adam? I don't know enough about Adam. I would take a chance with Raymond/Sweatt/Rodin + a third though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy is a slow skater to the point where it actually is problematic.

He's averaging about .5 PPG in the AHL this season.

Although there is some upside with him, I don't see him as a fit with Vancouver. Maybe on a 3rd line with a young, rebuilding team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.