Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

(Proposal) Van-SJ

Proposal

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 Alex Burrows 14

Alex Burrows 14

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,376 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 12

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:15 PM

Mason Raymond for Ryane Clowe

Clowes production has decreased lately and his contract expires at the end of the year as does raymonds. The sharks need speed and raymond obviously has speed. Sharks gain speed, Canucks gain toughness.



Im sure most people think this is ridiculous that he did this and that he is an idiot but i liked it. He might not have done it in the right way but he was sticking up for his teammate and we really need that.

He is tough and can score. Just because he hasnt scored yet this year doesnt mean hes done. Everyone has slumps. Look at raymond for example. But the thing with clowe is that he is always being physical and tough so even if he is a third liner, he will be solid. Low risk high reward trade
  • 0
Posted Image

#2 AriGold

AriGold

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,566 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 12

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:27 PM

You under value Ryan Clowe in a big way.
  • 0

fept5bc.jpg


#3 Machine Gun Kelly

Machine Gun Kelly

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,502 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 11

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:39 PM

No way SJ does this.
  • 0
Posted Image

#4 CptCanuck16

CptCanuck16

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  • Joined: 30-October 09

Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:12 PM

How about

(LW) Ryan Clowe ($3.6M)
(D) Brad Stewart $3.6M)

for

David Booth ($4.2)
Keith Ballard ($4.2)
  • 0

#5 Pineapples

Pineapples

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,726 posts
  • Joined: 15-June 10

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:24 PM

No way Sharks do that. While he hasn't been that great this year, he still holds a lot of value to them. Especially for the playoffs.
  • 0

Pineapple_jumps.gifPineapple_jumps.gif

 


#6 Aladeen

Aladeen

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,312 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 07

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:36 PM

If Wilson ever phoned Gillis offering this, Gillis would put him on hold then everyone in his office would do a Harlem Shake, then Gillis would come back on the phone and calmly agree!

Edited by Aladeen, 23 February 2013 - 11:36 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#7 JimLahey

JimLahey

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,440 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 12

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:38 PM

If Wilson ever phoned Gillis offering this, Gillis would put him on hold then everyone in his office would do a Harlem Shake, then Gillis would come back on the phone and calmly agree!


fixed

Edited by JimLahey, 23 February 2013 - 11:43 PM.

  • 1

hL9YqYN.jpg


#8 LeanBeef

LeanBeef

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,165 posts
  • Joined: 17-June 11

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:48 PM

Well a ton of Sj fans want Clowe for Stafford, who's not much better than Raymond, but personally i wouldnt do it. Schroeder doesnt play very good without Raymond and the two are amazing together.... Maybe a pick and Booth for Clowe? they need some speed down in SJ
  • 0
Sig too big.
"Being a Canuck fan, maybe sometime down the road be a Vancouver Canuck.... that would conquer all my dreams"
-Milan Lucic

#9 Super_Canuck

Super_Canuck

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,366 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 09

Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:08 AM

We couldn't even get steve ott for raymond last year if you remember. Stars refused to do it, what makes you think the sharks would give Clowe for him?
  • 0

#10 c00kies

c00kies

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,168 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 07

Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:00 AM

What about Hansen in a deal? We do have a lot of speed, and players that can play very well defensively, so he is extendable.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thanks to Blueberries for the sig :)

#11 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:26 AM

What about Hansen in a deal? We do have a lot of speed, and players that can play very well defensively, so he is extendable.


No he isn't.
  • 0

zackass.png


#12 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:30 AM

No he isn't.


Yes, we do have a great deal of speed in our lineup. Obviously.
  • 0
Posted Image

#13 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:40 AM

Yes, we do have a great deal of speed in our lineup. Obviously.


Hansen is probably our hardest worker, any can have a major impact on games when he wants too, especially in the playoffs.

If we want a cup, he is one of the last players I would trade, I would deal Higgins way before I would deal Hansen.
  • 0

zackass.png


#14 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:45 AM

Hansen is probably our hardest worker, any can have a major impact on games when he wants too, especially in the playoffs.

If we want a cup, he is one of the last players I would trade, I would deal Higgins way before I would deal Hansen.


I agree with that. However, our lineup probably is one of the fastest in the league.

Agree with you on that Hansen issue.
  • 0
Posted Image

#15 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,166 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:21 AM

I agree with that. However, our lineup probably is one of the fastest in the league.

Agree with you on that Hansen issue.


Yeah, and just cause we have alot of speed, doesn't mean we need to unload it, having that speed is a huge asset, especially when you consider alot of our bigger, gritty, more physical players bring that speed. (Kesler, Kassian, Booth, Hansen)

I would like to keep as much speed as we can personally.
  • 0

zackass.png


#16 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:28 AM

Yeah, and just cause we have alot of speed, doesn't mean we need to unload it, having that speed is a huge asset, especially when you consider alot of our bigger, gritty, more physical players bring that speed. (Kesler, Kassian, Booth, Hansen)

I would like to keep as much speed as we can personally.


Yes, I agree with that, too. Kesler, Kassian, and Booth have been more physical and offensively contributing, whereas, the speedy guys, such as Raymond, Hansen, Schroeder have been using their speed and grit to grind their opponents. I would love to see more of that during the Detroit game tomorrow.
  • 0
Posted Image

#17 bossram

bossram

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,943 posts
  • Joined: 13-August 10

Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:51 AM

I think Clowe has more value than Raymond.
  • 0
What is the deal with Mike Gillis, it always seems like he's sweating...

#18 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:52 AM

Clowe is dirtier than Raymond.
  • 0
Posted Image

#19 Bananas

Bananas

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,025 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 09

Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:17 AM

I like Clowe, but I think the spot he would have to replace would be the Higgins/Kassian spot on the second line.

If Raymond can play hard with Schroeder, then let him while he can.
  • 0
Hey CDC! Remember this!?

http://forum.canucks...in-this-change/

#20 EagleShield

EagleShield

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 394 posts
  • Joined: 18-February 13

Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:21 AM

I'd like Clowe, but your price point is wrong. Weise and a pick is about right.
  • 0

#21 The Kessing Booth line

The Kessing Booth line

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 342 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 12

Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:43 AM

I'd like Clowe, but your price point is wrong. Weise and a pick is about right.


Hahahahahahaha. I hope thats a joke.
  • 0

#22 Kassian's Face

Kassian's Face

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 11

Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:10 AM

:picard:

Its amazing the amount of people who seem to know nothing of the actual values of players, that spend their free time making proposals that are absurd. Then someone shoots it down, but not because the lack of any rationality, understanding, or even common sense, but they shoot it down by counter proposing an even more absurd offer.

This rant is not directed at this OP, as a matter of fact I think Clowe for Raymond is a fair trade but it would benefit the Sharks more then us in the long term by taking away valuable minutes from Kassian. I doubt Gillis would let go of Raymond for a piece that we aern't desperate for. Maybe next year if Jensen is playing amazingly and Schroeder can show his size doesn't matter, something involving Raymond could happen, but we aern't going to trade him just for trades sakes.
  • 0

#23 marleau_12

marleau_12

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,286 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 04

Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:48 PM

I stopped reading when someone pitched the idea that Hansen is expendable and can be dealt.
  • 0
Posted Image

#24 Edlerberry

Edlerberry

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,245 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:11 AM

I stopped reading when someone pitched the idea that Hansen is expendable and can be dealt.


I stopped reading when someone suggested the Harlem Shake
  • 0
July 7-2013

Toronto will take a step back next year.
Feel free to quote me.


July 8-2013

Wow I can't believe peoples replies...
Im done here. You people are disgusting..


#25 Canuck Surfer

Canuck Surfer

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,710 posts
  • Joined: 27-December 10

Posted 26 February 2013 - 08:36 AM

Booth is signed next year, Clowe is not!

Better or not, that makes Booth the better asset. And San Jose needs a shake up!

Booth for Clowe straight up!

Well a ton of Sj fans want Clowe for Stafford, who's not much better than Raymond, but personally i wouldnt do it. Schroeder doesnt play very good without Raymond and the two are amazing together.... Maybe a pick and Booth for Clowe? they need some speed down in SJ


  • 0

#26 BurrsArrows

BurrsArrows

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 517 posts
  • Joined: 01-April 12

Posted 26 February 2013 - 05:35 PM

not happening..
  • 0





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.