Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Eklund has posted that folwer to Boston may happen.IMO Fowler is EXACTLY what we need and I think we could def make a better package than Boston.ex: Hamhuis, Higgins, Beartschi, 2016 1st for Ritchie and Fowler thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanTSN Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 How is Vancouver tied to this rumour?Fowler to Boston for who? Chara? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Eklund has posted that folwer to Boston may happen.IMO Fowler is EXACTLY what we need and I think we could def make a better package than Boston.ex: Hamhuis, Higgins, Beartschi, 2015 1st for Ritchie and Fowler thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Eklund has posted that folwer to Boston may happen.IMO Fowler is EXACTLY what we need and I think we could def make a better package than Boston.ex: Hamhuis, Higgins, Beartschi, 2015 1st for Ritchie and Fowler thoughts?I like it! Trade picks from drafts that have already happened. 10/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 SO now we know Fowler isn't going to Boston. Thanks Eklund Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Author Share Posted November 1, 2015 I like it! Trade picks from drafts that have already happened. 10/10.my bad, fixed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 The Fowl moving Fowler to the fools?..I call foul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 The Fowl moving Fowler to the fools?..I call foul.at least something good came from this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robongo Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 The first guy moved on that blueline will likely be Vatanen. Can't see them moving Fowler under any scenario, huge piece for them back there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Author Share Posted November 1, 2015 The first guy moved on that blueline will likely be Vatanen. Can't see them moving Fowler under any scenario, huge piece for them back there.yeah I agree, thought it was bizarre anaheim would do that and that eklund would be so specific about it.Boston looks pretty good after Hamilton signed huge money and is tanking in CGY but the young kids they drafted - boy did they go off the board - Barzal and Kyle Conner would have been sweet pick ups for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Author Share Posted November 1, 2015 at least something good came from this threadouch!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 ouch!!!Sorry buddy! But Eklund rumours, especially when the rumour mill is quiet, dont add up much merit.I mean, even if it wasm't Eklund, I'd still be skeptical because the Bruins dont have logic. Honestly I wouldnt be surprised if I woke up tomorrow to see Rask was traded for peanuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Why would Anaheim move Fowler?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Author Share Posted November 1, 2015 Sorry buddy! But Eklund rumours, especially when the rumour mill is quiet, dont add up much merit.I mean, even if it wasm't Eklund, I'd still be skeptical because the Bruins dont have logic. Honestly I wouldnt be surprised if I woke up tomorrow to see Rask was traded for peanuts.agree, but part of the reason I started this thread was that if JB and the aquilinis have their hearts set on retooling while staying competitive then Fowler would be the type of guy to go after. And the trade I proposed I think is reasonable but would appreciate what others think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 agree, but part of the reason I started this thread was that if JB and the aquilinis have their hearts set on retooling while staying competitive then Fowler would be the type of guy to go after. And the trade I proposed I think is reasonable but would appreciate what others thinkI'd be exstatic if we aquired Fowler, however I can't see a trade for him not involving one of our top prospects. Would you do it? I don't think Anaheim would want Hamhuis... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nux4lyfe Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Eklund attention whoring.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Author Share Posted November 1, 2015 I'd be exstatic if we aquired Fowler, however I can't see a trade for him not involving one of our top prospects. Would you do it? I don't think Anaheim would want Hamhuis...every team wants a top prospect but look at kesler, kessel, spezza - no top prospects exchanged in those trades. I think ANA has a lot of good young d men - vatanen, theadore, lindholm, despres, manson and that they were hoping bieksa would be their new beauchemin altyhough their NHL scouts clearly did not see him play enough last year. I think they would take Hamhuis - one year contract, gives them time to grow theadore. I think they need some complementary vets and I think Beartschi - if played with kess and slverberg would be a great fit for them. I think adding the first and getting ritchie makes the deal fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 Kesler: we got McCann with the pickKessel: Kaspari Kapanen, Scott Harington, more picks which will be prospectsSpezza: Nick Paul, 2nd round pick what are you talking about? Unless we move our 1st rounder plus more, we are giving up one of our top prospects. They picked up Bieksa cause they needed a right hand shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted November 1, 2015 Author Share Posted November 1, 2015 Kesler: we got McCann with the pickKessel: Kaspari Kapanen, Scott Harington, more picks which will be prospectsSpezza: Nick Paul, 2nd round pick what are you talking about? Unless we move our 1st rounder plus more, we are giving up one of our top prospects. They picked up Bieksa cause they needed a right hand shot.yeah I know who was involved in the trade, but these were not the teams top prospects, there like B+ prospects - I mean, we wont be looking at giving up a Horvat/Virtannen/Mccann/Hutton because you can get a trade done with B+ prospects and later 1st round picks (I imagine with fowler, we make the playoffs) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted November 1, 2015 Share Posted November 1, 2015 They will want that for him though. His actual value is irrelevant because Anaheim has no reason to move him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.