Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

rekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,270

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rekker

  1. rekker
    Interesting. Medicine Hat pedigrees.
  2. rekker
    Winning cups will have that effect.
  3. rekker
    I don't think so. Lots of past mistakes that cannot be undone at this point . We have some elite core talent in their prime, or entering it. Regardless of our limps, wounds, scars, we go for it now.
  4. rekker
    The non qualifiers on D have Tocchet's prints all over it. He wants more snarl. Bless him.
  5. rekker
    Easily, easily the worst D pairing per dollars spent in franchis history. I could of put any two forwards out there together and it would of looked the same. It was Keystone Cops when they paired up.
  6. rekker
    I agree. Not a fan of Duchene's lazy game, but sheesh, he wasn't even close to OEL type trash.
  7. rekker
    Between Pouilott, Megna, the twitching clipboard guy. Yip, there were a lot of empty Pils around my home that winter. Lol.
  8. rekker
    This franchise is allergic to draft picks. A third and a fifth walk with Dermott and Bear.
  9. rekker
    While I agree for the most part. Hughes is a one.
  10. rekker
    Just is what it is. We need more Luke Schenn types than we do Bear types.
  11. rekker
    I wouldn't say awful, like Pouliot is awful. I do remember some defensive gafs but I find Juulsen can be steady if he keeps it simple.
  12. rekker
    Yip. Nothing against Bear. He's a good Dman, just not what we need. Definitely need a more defensive, physical dman with those monies. Same for Dermott. I hope this is why neither was qualified, and if it is, and they aquire a big physical shutdown D or two, I will applaud management.
  13. rekker
    So looks like management decided Juulsen over Burroughs?
  14. rekker
    We did something, lol. Good depth signing.
  15. rekker
    Probably. I'm guessing the Jets floated him out there with monies retained, but no takers. The hockey world is a small group, they would know.
  16. rekker
    This is why Trotz was such a good coach. Buys out a couple floaters and boots them off the team. He won't put up with mediocrity.
  17. rekker
    Some big buyouts this off season I wonder if GM"s have gotten word that with more money in the system next year that teams will be allowed one buyout, retroactive as well.
  18. rekker
    Was always surprised when Corey Perry never ended up in Toronto. Seems like a good fit.
  19. rekker
    Holy crap. That's crazy money for Perry.
  20. rekker
    This, a younger target please. I like Pesce as well but it would kill any depth we have to aquire him.
  21. rekker
    Burroughs is already better than Foote. More physical, more reliable. Foote on a two way contract where he can get better in the minors maybe makes sense.
  22. rekker
    Foote wasn't that great in Kelowna. Nepotism starts at youth level and 100 percent continues through drafting and the pro ranks. Seen in, lived it. No way Foote should of gone in the first round. Even Ronning was a reach and probably never even drafted if not for his name. Gauranteed both these players would of gone later if they had different last names. Nah, seen too much to think otherwise.
  23. rekker
    I as well. Real postive reviews on this young man
  24. rekker
    Shotgun approach baby!!
  25. rekker
    Nepotism is a real thing my friend. Been in youth hockey for 15 years. It carries right through to the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...