coastal.view

i have never used facebook not sure why anyone would they have very serious privacy issues it is reckless to have an account i think

i am not being stupid about this i say continue with all safety recommendations i appreciate your annoyance with other online sources i am serious in my posting so read my posts from that perspective (it seems gurn does, anyone else?)

why are you personalizing this? i work i exercise i eat i sleep is that ok?

i'm simply saying listen to her she says go out and exercise she also clearly laid out the plan to get this virus under control to flatten the curve i do not wish to engage in symmantics with you over the word control we no longer have an uncontrolled outbreak it is being tracked with testing cluster outbreaks are aggressively responded to and contained authorities are doing a very good job and have developed sophisticated methods to deal with the virus so the plan has worked

no that is your narrative dr. henry clearly says go out and walk and exercise

you do understand dr henry is the spokesperson for the medical profession for the bc center for disease control you pretend she is acting in isolation why do you need to engage in this manner of misinformation?

not sure if you are clear on what the mandate or goal was it was to flatten the curve of the pandemic out break to get on top of things and track infections this is all in place there is no plan or illusion that these steps we will stop infections but the steps that have been taken have done what they were intended to do a vaccine will be helpful and will get us back to normal i have not been advocating going back to normal presently there is no guarantee that a vaccine will be easily developed this virus is sars2, they still have not developed a vaccine for sars the vaccine narrative might be a bit optimistic

you are spit balling going out is safe walk and get exercise it is good for your health

don't be patronizing it is stupid i have elderly parents who i do not presently see your emotional nonsense does not help i follow the bc authorities updates i don't need 30 articles from the internet to confuse things not sure why you think mass information not properly distilled is helpful the reality is the virus is controlled and tracked so we have accomplished the initial necessary step let's take the next one

so you are the authority you issued the memo? seriously people do what is safe but don't cower in what was needed to make things safe learn from it continue to apply and let's get more sophisticated about how to more clearly limit activity going forward a complete shut down is not sustainable and will in fact incite non compliance it has to make sense to be effective

you plan to stay home for 18 months ?

not true dr henry repeatedly tells people to get out get exercise do you even watch her updates? i do daily you have your own agenda i think

completely untrue you are naive to what we have just seen happen the entire population effectively followed recommendations and the virus outbreak was managed to be controlled that is reality not sure what else you need to see

based on what? you are fear mongering practice the safety recommendations i'm not saying go back entirely to how things were before i just want to start slowly to more options for people isolation has its own costs

you fail to answer what other realism needs to be factored in i get that some people feel afraid no matter what fear levels do not determine what is safe i strongly advocated adhering to all restrictions and recommendations they worked so great, they worked so let's get on with things if we see there is more then a minor set back we can always readjust and be a little more restrictive but i doubt that will happen people will maintain safe practices they have learned we are not stupid

i think you over react which makes me wonder if you really know how the virus actually is transmitted people need to maintain distancing cover their coughing or wear a mask wash hands regularly and effectively and stay home if/when they have any ailment not sure what other realism you think needs to be factored in i have listed the safety recommendation anything and anyone that can follow these can again become a safe activity so for the majority of us that can do that we will not be infected by the stupid minority who refuse i feel safe enough now and wish to get on with things

he'll be free soon go ahead and sign him

so you think luongo should not be permitted to retire?

that begs the question what is normal for trump?

not sure why this is as big a deal as being made out in my experience property tax debt is simply secured by charging the property and the city eventually does get paid making this a secured debt (have you ever been involved in a conveyance where property tax was not an adjustment issue?) so this is really a cash flow issue and taking steps to finance this flow solves insolvency issues what am i missing here? all businesses deal with these sorts of issues regularly and banks are easily on board when there are ebbs in cash flow particularly where the ebb portion in the flow is converted to secured debt

no need to focus on sweden the netherlands is the real test case and are getting hammered sweden has had a bit more of a controlled approach from the beginning netherlands simply did monitoring without intervention uk was also on the netherlands approach and then bailed with boris was shown death number projections netherlands is a smallish country - 17 million people - approaching 3,000 deaths canada is about 2x the population size, so would be tracking close to 6,000 instead of 717, if they followed netherlands approach

right except you for overlooking that we got to where we are because the vast majority did as recommended so not sure why you still wish to focus on the minority you want rules for the minority who won't follow them anyway i'd rather see more realistic rules for everyone with some enforcement for those who breach

well i think in our society the freedom of the majority is not curtailed by a minority of bad apples i think their failures to comply are overstated mostly anyway it is a small number of people and no matter what they have or have not done the current stricter regime was not followed by them and they did not really impact the outbreak so not sure why we want to continue to constrain the rest of us to this degree when the non compliant ones were not complying before not sure what logic is being used here the vast majority of people will continue to comply \ and be careful and follow recommendations impose tougher penalties on those who do not but don't take that issue out on the majority of us

deb look at the initial post i made that started this ongoing discussion it's pretty straight forward nothing odd about how that number was reached

sorry you are so deeply bothered i'm sure there are more important issues then the format of my posting