Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Hunter Shinkaruk | C/W


-Vintage Canuck-

Recommended Posts

Hodgson is highly underrated defensively and is and always will be 10x the hockey player Horvat will be.... Maybe if the Canucks selected Nichushkin or Domi, those 2 would have a CHANCE to be anywhere near Hodgson as players but Horvat is a 3rd line grinder

this guy knows his stuff...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hodgson is highly underrated defensively and is and always will be 10x the hockey player Horvat will be.... Maybe if the Canucks selected Nichushkin or Domi, those 2 would have a CHANCE to be anywhere near Hodgson as players but Horvat is a 3rd line grinder

Hodgson is a -14 in 71 career games with Buffalo chump[1]

[1] http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/nhl/players/4483/career;_ylt=AhkS0bd_R7rWnqPniQzh9kPCfgM6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hodgson is a -14 in 71 career games with Buffalo chump[1]

[1] http://ca.sports.yah...qPniQzh9kPCfgM6

LOLOLOLOL YOU ACTUALLY THINK PLUS MINUS A REFLECTION ON AN INDIVIDUAL PLAYER RATHER THAN THE TEAM HE'S PLAYING ON HAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh man you are hilarious. He's playing on a bottom feeder with horrible defense. -14 is actually very good considering the team he's on, child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOLOLOLOL YOU ACTUALLY THINK PLUS MINUS A REFLECTION ON AN INDIVIDUAL PLAYER RATHER THAN THE TEAM HE'S PLAYING ON HAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh man you are hilarious. He's playing on a bottom feeder with horrible defense. -14 is actually very good considering the team he's on, child.

you think Bergeron would be a minus 14 on that team?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOLOLOLOL YOU ACTUALLY THINK PLUS MINUS A REFLECTION ON AN INDIVIDUAL PLAYER RATHER THAN THE TEAM HE'S PLAYING ON HAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh man you are hilarious. He's playing on a bottom feeder with horrible defense. -14 is actually very good considering the team he's on, child.

Oh_he_mad.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dasein

Hodgson without doubt is the better offensive player.

Horvat is without doubt a better 2-way player with a more complete game. Horvat today as an 18-year-old could clean Hodgson out in the faceoff dot. His skating at 18 is much better than Hodgson today. His defensive game was good enough to get a good look before getting sent down at age 18 - something Hodgson was not capable of.

Having been sent down for another year, Horvat has a chance to develop his offensive skills and truly dominate the league before making the jump to the pros.

Comparing Hodgson and Horvat is like comparing Matt Duchene and Ryan O'Reilly. They're two ifferent players.

EDIT: LOL sorry didn't even realize this is Hunter's thread.

Hunter is a better offensive threat individually - Hodgson is a better offensive threat as a passer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOLOLOLOL YOU ACTUALLY THINK PLUS MINUS A REFLECTION ON AN INDIVIDUAL PLAYER RATHER THAN THE TEAM HE'S PLAYING ON HAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh man you are hilarious. He's playing on a bottom feeder with horrible defense. -14 is actually very good considering the team he's on, child.

For some of your last posts here, this is a whole pile of fail.

Why are people talking about Coho in the Shinkaruk thread though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, same reason why Vanek is a -3 so far this year and Tavares is a lifetime -38 with the Islanders. People who use +- to prove how good a player is defensively don't know a thing about hockey.

It's not perfect but yes, +/- indicates a player's overall defensive ability.

Not being scored on means you will have a +20 rating no matter what the team you're on, check it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not perfect but yes, +/- indicates a player's overall defensive ability.

Not being scored on means you will have a +20 rating no matter what the team you're on, check it.

LOL it judges all the players on the ice at the time not the individual player, rofl. +- is the most in accurate stat you can use to judge a player's defensive ability, period. Go read up on it on hfboards' "by the numbers" forum. Expert statisticians all agree that +- is not an accurate stat for the ability of a player.... you have no clue.

http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1488741

Read this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for getting this thread back on track.

Seeing what Tomas Hertl is doing for the Sharks as a 19 year old makes me really hope Shinkaruk can make the jump next year.

Hertl had played in a men's league for 2 years already. But there's no telling what a finisher like Shinkaruk could do if he played with the Sedins. Like Hertl they threw him right onto the top line.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hertl is a much bigger player and it shows. I do hope Hunter's body physically matures by the start of next season.

Hertl is doing what I had dreamed Jensen could do: Succeed on the top line, albeit at a younger age. Shinkaruk has a much smaller body than Hertl but his skill is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shinkaruk had a (shorthanded) goal and an assist tonight vs. Moose Jaw, bringing him to 3-3-6 in 3 games (same as Horvat).

I really hope next season has a youth revolution (Sinkaruk, Horvat, Gaunce, and Jensen making the team).

Hunter is the dynamic scorer the Canucks have not had in forever, I just hope he can develop to his potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...