Franz Liszt Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 - This fits under the cap - This is a 24-man roster - All other teams still fit under the salary cap, even with signing one or two cheap UFAs - Toronto & Dallas aren't completely ready to compete for a cup. They are one season away from peaking I feel, so retaining a tiny bit of salary will open it up for them more next year to compete for UFA's with the cap going up ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To MTL: Alexander Edler + 2014 2nd To VAN: Brendan Gallagher, Alexei Emelin + MTL 2014 1st ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To TOR: Adam Polasek + VAN 2014 1st & 2015 2nd To VAN: Cody Franson (RFA) & Nikolai Kulemin (20% salary retained) Polasek + 2nd = Franson's RFA rights 1st = Kulemin (80% salary) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To DAL: David Booth, Peter Andersson + MTL 2014 1st To VAN: Rich Peverley (20% retained salary) & Cameron Gaunce Booth + 1st = Peverley (80% salary) Andersson = Gaunce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sign Mark Fistric to 3 years @ $2.75 million. $0.916 cap hit ROSTER Sedin Sedin Kassian Burrows Kesler Gallagher Kulemin Schroeder Peverley Higgins Richardson Hansen Sestito, Weise Hamhuis Bieksa Garrison Franson Emelin Tanev Fistric, Weber Luongo & Läck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 3-trade proposals always seem drastic to me but I really like the first deal and I think the value is almost spot-on with Markov likely retiring soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22sedins33 Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I'm not the hugest fan of the plan as a whole but if the Canucks managed to make the first deal I would be beyond ecstatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I dont' know if the first trade would actually go through. Gallagher just finished a good rookie season and looks to be part of the future for the Canadians. Unless if Montreal is really desperate for another defenceman, I can't see them doing it. Add to that you're requesting another prospect and a 1st???? Edler's valuable sure but he's not the Taj Mahal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harmer Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I could see that happening good proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxgoalie Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 People really underestimate the value of Emelin on here: He would look great in a Canucks jersey. But Montreal needs that physicality on the blue line. Take out the picks, Emelin + Gallagher straight up for Edler (if you want fair value) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drouin Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 First deal would be pretty nice. Emelin on the 3rd pair would be awesome. Gallagher would be great top-6 forward help. Keep Booth though Booth-Kesler-Gallagher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks#01fan Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I dont think Toronto would do that trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 As a Montreal fan I'd rather have what Gallagher and Emelin bring to the team over what edler would, not to mention the 1st round pick. It would be a solid no if I had any say lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 As a Montreal fan I'd rather have what Gallagher and Emelin bring to the team over what edler would, not to mention the 1st round pick. It would be a solid no if I had any say lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 People really underestimate the value of Emelin on here: He would look great in a Canucks jersey. But Montreal needs that physicality on the blue line. Take out the picks, Emelin + Gallagher straight up for Edler (if you want fair value) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I would still do that. Emelin would instantly become a fan favourite here. Also if Edler can regain his physical side he'll easily repace Emelin on Montreal's blue line. Win-win for both teams IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 First deal would be pretty nice. Emelin on the 3rd pair would be awesome. Gallagher would be great top-6 forward help. Keep Booth though Booth-Kesler-Gallagher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mangoes Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Why is Higgins in 4th line? He just had a good short 48 game season with the Canucks scoring key goals I see him as a 2nd or 3rd line winger due to the fact that he has great chemistry with Kesler and possibly good chemistry with Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted July 31, 2013 Author Share Posted July 31, 2013 Why is Higgins in 4th line? He just had a good short 48 game season with the Canucks scoring key goals I see him as a 2nd or 3rd line winger due to the fact that he has great chemistry with Kesler and possibly good chemistry with Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 People really underestimate the value of Emelin on here: He would look great in a Canucks jersey. But Montreal needs that physicality on the blue line. Take out the picks, Emelin + Gallagher straight up for Edler (if you want fair value) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 How much do we sign Franson for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted July 31, 2013 Author Share Posted July 31, 2013 How much do we sign Franson for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I like it. Might need to add a touch more to the Dallas trade but other than that it's good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Didn't Dallas just pick up Peverly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.