Rex425 Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 He has been scoring goals as of late, he is a right winger that could maybe play with the Sedins with some grit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Fans of other teams say a banana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Probably a 1st and 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 2nd 3rd in 2014 plus 2nd in 2015 or C+ forward prospect. Rather give Archibald, Grenier a chance in a season or two and keep the picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 2nd 3rd in 2014 plus 2nd in 2015 or C+ forward prospect. Rather give Archibald, Grenier a chance in a season or two and keep the picks That's not enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 2nd 3rd in 2014 plus 2nd in 2015 or C+ forward prospect. Rather give Archibald, Grenier a chance in a season or two and keep the picks Not even close. They'd want Edler at least. What about Edler, Hansen, Schroeder, 2nd for Simmonds and Laughton? Edler, Schroeder, 2nd = Simmonds Hansen > Laughton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Proberly Kass +1st/2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Not even close. They'd want Edler at least. What about Edler, Hansen, Schroeder, 2nd for Simmonds and Laughton? Edler, Schroeder, 2nd = Simmonds Hansen > Laughton you'd really give that much for Simmonds alone? Ask yourself what the Isles give you for that and then forget the Flyers number all together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 you'd really give that much for Simmonds alone? Ask yourself what the Isles give you for that and then forget the Flyers number all together. The way I look at it is that Laughton fits our future better than Schroeder, as does Simmonds. Potential line up for next year: Sedin - Sedin - Simmonds Burrows - Horvat - Kesler Higgins - Laughton - Kassian Richardson - Santorelli - Booth/Archibald/Grenier Hamhuis - Tanev Garrison - Bieksa Stanton - Corrado Luongo Lack What's not to like? But yea call the Isles up with that offer and guaranteed they offer us something juicy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronalds.Kenins41 Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Not even close. They'd want Edler at least. What about Edler, Hansen, Schroeder, 2nd for Simmonds and Laughton? Edler, Schroeder, 2nd = Simmonds Hansen > Laughton Make that 2nd into a first and then they will talk. This guy is so overated it's not even funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Make that 2nd into a first and then they will talk. This guy is so overated it's not even funny. Everyone is overrated according to CDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronalds.Kenins41 Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Everyone is overrated according to CDC. This guy belongs in his own category of overated on CDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 This guy belongs in his own category of overated on CDC. Care to tell me why you think Simmonds is overrated? Isn't he the type of young power forward that Canucks fans are screaming for to play with the Sedins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 We should never trade picks again to save people time on making proposal LA drafted Simmonds with our pick, bad trade for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baka Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 In December Games: 12 Goals: 7 Assists: 5 Points: 12 In general he is good for around 25-30 goals a year. 25 years old and locked up at 3.975 per year for the next 5 years after this. A true power forward who scores most of his goals of rebounds in front of the net while outworking defenders. Plus is a hard nosed player who fights, hits, and is great at winning battles along the boards. Philadelphia basically has no reason to want to move him. No reason for them to move him for draft picks or prospects as they don't need those and as far as roster players go moving him only makes sense if they get back a player who fills a team need. Long story short he won't be on the table unless they are made an offer they can't refuse. Aka overpayment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakrami Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 In December Games: 12 Goals: 7 Assists: 5 Points: 12 In general he is good for around 25-30 goals a year. 25 years old and locked up at 3.975 per year for the next 5 years after this. A true power forward who scores most of his goals of rebounds in front of the net while outworking defenders. Plus is a hard nosed player who fights, hits, and is great at winning battles along the boards. Philadelphia basically has no reason to want to move him. No reason for them to move him for draft picks or prospects as they don't need those and as far as roster players go moving him only makes sense if they get back a player who fills a team need. Long story short he won't be on the table unless they are made an offer they can't refuse. Aka overpayment. Why doesn't philly need prospects or picks? Are they going for the cup this year? Are they very deep in prospects? Both answers are no fyi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baka Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Why doesn't philly need prospects or picks? Are they going for the cup this year? Are they very deep in prospects? Both answers are no fyi. Teams don't trade core players for draft picks and prospects unless they are rebuilding. 1. Philadelphia may not be a cup favorite right now but they are holding a playoff spot. Teams that are holding playoff seats don't trade away core players for prospects and picks. It should also be noted that Philadelphia started the season horribly and held the 30th ranked seed for a few weeks so the fact that they have climbed this high shows they have been on the upswing. 2. You are correct while they have some decent prospect the depth of non NHL prospects is fairly low but once again they aren't in need of picks and prospects because the team in general is very young. Lecavalier - 33 Hartnell - 31 Downie - 26 Read - 26 Giroux - 25 Simmonds - 25 Raffle - 25 Voracek - 24 Rinaldo - 23 B. Schenn - 22 Couturier - 21 Timonen - 38 Streit - 36 Coburn - 28 Meszaros - 28 Grossmann - 28 Gustafsson - 25 L. Schenn - 24 Mason - 25 Emery 31 Overall this is a very young team so what would the point be in trading a strong 25 year old player who is locked up for 5 more years for a younger prospect? Why would this team want or need to get younger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 he would be ideal thats for sure. but an overpayment and or us taking a not so good contract would have to happen. edler hansen for simmonds l.schenn(salary reasons) would you do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 he would be ideal thats for sure. but an overpayment and or us taking a not so good contract would have to happen. edler hansen for simmonds l.schenn(salary reasons) would you do this? No. Because I think once Edler gets going and if he is dangled he will net the team a much better return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeefcakeBo Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 he would be ideal thats for sure. but an overpayment and or us taking a not so good contract would have to happen. edler hansen for simmonds l.schenn(salary reasons) would you do this? Lol every gm does that. No way they throw in l schenn for salary reasons. They are as high up on him as ever. They just traded jvr for him. Some of the proposals around here are just way to funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.