saucypass Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 To Van: 1st Overall Pick To Fla: Gaunce+6th overall (2014) Future C's Reinhart Horvat Cassels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 The difference between 6th and 1st overall is alot more then a unproven NHL prospect... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 The difference between 6th and 1st overall is alot more then a unproven NHL prospect... So you're telling me that Fla would not take Ehlers and Gaunce for Reinhart? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 So you're telling me that Fla would not take Ehlers and Gaunce for Reinhart? LOL every team in the top 10 can make a lot better deal for 1st overall. horrid proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai604 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 So you're telling me that Fla would not take Ehlers and Gaunce for Reinhart? That's exactly what he's saying and he's right. Not a chance Florida takes that horrible deal, lol. You're either overrating Gaunce, or underrating the first overall pick, which could also a Aaron Eklblad. Many scouts consider him a future number 1/2 defenseman, possibly franchise d-man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 So you're telling me that Fla would not take Ehlers and Gaunce for Reinhart? Well for starters if I was Florida I would take Ekblad as he is a glaring need for the future of the team as they have many Centers already. To name a few Barkov, Bjustad, Pirri, Shore, Trocheck, Grimaldi are all centers coming up. But to answer your question If I was Florida I would not take Gaunce + Ehlers for Reinhart, No... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 Bout Edler+Gaunce+ Hansen1st+ 4th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kesler+Horvat Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 6th Overall + Gaunce + Corrado Why not just go for a top 3 pick? Doesn't have to be 1st Overall. We could get Reinhart/Bennett/Ekblad I'd be happy. 6th Overall + Edler for 3rd Overall + Schultz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kesler+Horvat Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Bout Edler+Gaunce+ Hansen1st+ 4th? Woah, you went from Adding Gaunce to the 6th Overall to adding Edler + Gaunce + Hansen + 4th. Now it's way too much. Edler + 6th Overall for J,Schultz + 3rd Overall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 Woah, you went from Adding Gaunce to the 6th Overall to adding Edler + Gaunce + Hansen + 4th. Now it's way too much. Edler + 6th Overall for J,Schultz + 3rd Overall + 1 I like this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Am.Ironman Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 So would anybody... except Edler, he wouldn't like it. Which is why he also wouldn't waive his no trade clause to go to EDM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted May 11, 2014 Author Share Posted May 11, 2014 That's true. Oh well, guess we'll just have to tie him up to a chair until he agrees to waive to Edmonton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Horrible proposal. How about a used toothbrush and an old skateboard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L. Stanley Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 6th Overall + Gaunce + Corrado Why not just go for a top 3 pick? Doesn't have to be 1st Overall. We could get Reinhart/Bennett/Ekblad I'd be happy. 6th Overall + Edler for 3rd Overall + Schultz I think that deal helps both teams and it is fair, but edler would have to be forced out which could happen but not likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogerEpic5 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Horrible trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madness Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Wouldn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karlsson`s Flo Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Florida probably won't agree unless it's Horvat + 1st. Which is extremely steep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saucypass Posted May 12, 2014 Author Share Posted May 12, 2014 Horrible proposal. How about a used toothbrush and an old skateboard? Sure why not, I'd even throw in a chewed up dog toy while I'm at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Well for starters if I was Florida I would take Ekblad as he is a glaring need for the future of the team as they have many Centers already. To name a few Barkov, Bjustad, Pirri, Shore, Trocheck, Grimaldi are all centers coming up. But to answer your question If I was Florida I would not take Gaunce + Ehlers for Reinhart, No... If they wanted defence why not Seth Jones last year? Something is off with Florida. I wouldn't be all that surprised if they took Bennett or Reino. Or even trade down. Florida is an enigma. If I were Tallon I'd just take Ekblad, guy is going to be something special and helps their defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nergish Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I think that deal helps both teams and it is fair, but edler would have to be forced out which could happen but not likely I love this deal. Not a huge risk for either side, and it fits the direction both teams are going. But yeah...Convincing Edler to go to Edmonton though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.