Kanukfanatic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 (edited) This came from hf: Buddy of mine knows a bunch of Canucks bloggers and they are all saying 10th+Virtanen for Barrie+16th. Edit: If this ended up being true this would be a great trade for the Canucks. Edited June 22, 2019 by Kanukfanatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maketherightmove Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Just now, Kanukfanatic said: This came from hf: Buddy of mine knows a bunch of Canucks bloggers and they are all saying 10th+Virtanen for Barrie+16th. That’s a fine trade if true. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Just now, Kanukfanatic said: This came from hf: Buddy of mine knows a bunch of Canucks bloggers and they are all saying 10th+Virtanen for Barrie+16th. if was true it would be a solid trade, then snag Soderstrom ????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Moose Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Just now, Kanukfanatic said: This came from hf: Buddy of mine knows a bunch of Canucks bloggers and they are all saying 10th+Virtanen for Barrie+16th. Just seems like a lot to give up for a rental.. I'd prefer something like 10OA + Tanev + 2nd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maketherightmove Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Just now, KeslerWho? said: Just seems like a lot to give up for a rental.. I'd prefer something like 10OA + Tanev + 2nd More often than not players in their prime sign with the team they’re playing for than go to FA. Barrie is from BC, he’s even more incentivized to re-sign. Wouldn’t call him a rental. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 1 minute ago, KeslerWho? said: Just seems like a lot to give up for a rental.. I'd prefer something like 10OA + Tanev + 2nd the idea is he is not going to be a rental. Right. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 $&!#. Zegras is very possibly available at ten. Does Benning still trade him to Colorado for Barrie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, N4ZZY said: $&!#. Zegras is very possibly available at ten. Does Benning still trade him to Colorado for Barrie? Could be condition if he’s there it’s next years first and jakeJake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 13 minutes ago, KeslerWho? said: Just seems like a lot to give up for a rental.. I'd prefer something like 10OA + Tanev + 2nd If they're including a 1st this year in the deal chances are the extension has been agreed upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Moose Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 < 5 minutes till we find out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 17 minutes ago, Kanukfanatic said: This came from hf: Buddy of mine knows a bunch of Canucks bloggers and they are all saying 10th+Virtanen for Barrie+16th. Edit: If this ended up being true this would be a great trade for the Canucks. That would be pretty ideal really... not too much drop off from 10-16... though Seider might have been someone we were looking at later. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dombrova22 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 FU*K ME. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 can't deny Podkolzin is one of the forwards with the highest offensive ceiling! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Well... lol...that tells us the 10th was not in play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 One would think that if a trade had been done for Barrie it would have been announced. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 At least if it is a first round pick, it is next years 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Moose Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kanukfanatic said: One would think that if a trade had been done for Barrie it would have been announced. Yeah, cant see it happening now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maketherightmove Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kanukfanatic said: One would think that if a trade had been done for Barrie it would have been announced. Ya it was likely not even that close the media was just drumming up excitement as usual. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Moose Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 With Canucks drafting Podkolzin, I guess it kind of negates the need for Virtanen at some level? A lot of people would consider Virtanen on the 3rd line a bust. Maybe he's still in play in a package with Tanev? 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THERETOOL Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 canucks making a huge splash today !!!!! errrrrrrrrrrr,,,,,,,,,,, 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now