Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Amex Thoughts?


Silfverberg Snipes

  

111 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

At some point they have to actually take a risk and get an established player... Else they won't win the cup.

Mg strat to get players: free agency but dont overpay, or trade for players with potential but who are not playing well so u can get them cheap. Don't give away young players if possible. Great if u can get free agents to take beneath market value, but really not many players will do that.

Best scenario: use the cap space saved so far and use it to actually bid and get a player like Parise or Semin or someone to play with Kesler. It is called taking a risk to make a push and win a cup.

Even Detroit did it when they could with Hossa.

So forget the Amex line we need to do something NOW while we are in the window

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 2nd line is exactly what you want - it is perfect. All 3 skaters were scoring at a 20-goal pace and 50 point pace or greater which is all you can ask from your 2nd line.

Don't expect a 40 goal scorer and 80 point player to be playing behind the Sedins. For what they're worth, Higgins and Booth are great 2nd line wingers and would be first liners on most poor offensive teams. AV just needs to keep them together - as soon as he took Higgins off the 2nd line in favour for Raymond the guys just started to stink.

Hopefully MG doesn't re-sign Raymond so AV has no choice but to play the 3 Americans together. Injuries really hurt their chances in the playoffs, but even then we saw Higgins on the 3rd line bogged down by a much slower Pahlsson and less talented Hansen.

P.S Parise is not coming to Vancouver, and if he is he's playing with the Sedins anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's simple you cannot say the AMEX line does not need a playmaker...

Kesler will never be a playmaker because hes a scorer (didn;t want to call him a sniper)

Booth is a grinding scorer

Kes is good for 35-40 goals booth 30 goals - with a playmaker on there line..

its pretty simple to see that they need a playmaker

yes higgins is a great player but that doesn't mean that he can be that guy

its obvious they need a play maker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twins - Booth (if David can snap shots off quickly off feeds from the Twins he can be dangerous on that top line!)

looks like the 2nd line can't be AMEX anymore, since I can't think of any realistically attainable American play maker who they can acquire; I think that line has some good pieces to work with (or pieces that can be acquired) but the right combo needs to be found;

presuming Kes is set up the middle:

play making winger: Ray Whitney (UFA) or Tyler Ennis (RFA with cash-strapped Buffalo); wild card: Brad Boyes (UFA)

complementary shooters (these guys aren't exclusively shoot-first): Chris Higgins/ Alex Burrows/ Jannik Hansen? (if Schroeder makes it or if Pavelski comes over for Lu? then AMEX can stay :P)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone want to keep trading for other teams players?

If were going to win, were going to win with a nucleas that knows how to play with eachother and wants to play with eachother. The only way that happens is by growing this team together.

Im sick of hearing about how we need to trade for a player to play with Kesler. Its time Kesler start playing for others as well. He was so selfish this season at times that it made me sick. I have been the biggest Kesler fan since we drafted him... When he was signed to a offer sheet from the Flyers I prayed we would keep him because I knew he would turn out to be a top line player. And he has... but a front line player needs to make others around him better. He showed chemistry with Booth for about one game.. THATS IT. ONE game.

We have Kassian, Jensen who are both going to be 2 amazing players. Its time Vignault start working them into our core. I know Jensen is young, and hasnt even played pro yet, but this team needs an injection of youth on their top 2 lines especially.

As much as you liked seeing the Amex line together for the three games they actually played well together, that isnt a line that is going to work long term. Higgins simply isnt a 2nd line player.

If we can deal Schnieder for a Brett Connolly type player, Gillis needs to jump right on that. We need a young player who can play now and can be a star for us for many years down the road.

Also, enough of these bloody Americans who dont even care about winning in Vancouver. I have gotten no feeling whatsoever from Higgins or Booth that they care to win in this city. None. Booth spends more time bible thumping and planning where hes going on his next hunting trip than actually winning. This team needs players like Burrows, Bieksa, Hamhuis who would give anything to win here for this city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that should have been our 2nd line all season. I mean Raymond over Higgins? seriously?

Sedins-Burrows

Booth-Kesler-Higgins

Raymond-Hodgson/Pahlsson-Hansen

that would have been a much better 3 lines for us in the long run. AV has to stop using his favourites, if you don't produce don't play them and that is Raymond...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget the AMEX line. Definitely need another top 6 forward, a playmaker, or as canucksnihilist says we need to take a chance on an experienced, legitimate top 6 player. Enough screwing around, lets take a risk and bring a bonfide player in to fix our second line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about Pacioretty? Great caphit (1.8), still pretty young at 23, and near ppg last season. Very injury prone though. Seems like someone Gillis would want, a mid risk high reward player.

Maybe we couldve done this during the deadline earlier this year.

Hodgson

Raymond

1st

For

Max Pacioretty

Travis Moen

3rd

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Pacioretty-Kesler-Booth

Higgins-Pahlsson-Hansen

Moen-Malhotra-Lapierre

Pretty solid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...