Caboose Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 not to the same pedigree as ovechkin the idiot above was comparing landeskog to ovechkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvgeniMalkin Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Landeskog is an Ovechkin type player, and he could reach that level. Ovechkin was a force in his rookie year, Landeskog doesn't exactly have the same pedigree either, but is a much more responsible and well composed. Ovechkin is more of a "loose cannon". Landeskog should be a captain, Ovechkin should not. Landeskog is also miles better defensively than Ovechkin was in his rookie year, although Landeskog was brought up in the North American system so that isn't a very fair comparison. What are your thoughts? This is just my analysis after watching them both. My point is though, if Landeskog was on the table for Schneider I would take it and never look back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 I posted this in another thread. I've heard rumours of Schneids to Columbus for Jack Johnson or Moore, plus their first pick in this years draft...which could be number one overall. That first overall from Columbus could be huge. And in case you aren't familiar with the talent at the top of this years draft, here are the top two rated by Central Scouting: 1. LW Nail Yakupov – Sarnia (OHL): 2. LC Mikhail Grigorenko – Quebec (QMJHL): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonimator#19 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 you know teams can't trade after the deadline right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurf47 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I'd take anyone for Schneider who has a better SP of .932 and GOA of better than 2.09...and potential to get better...otherwise ..trade Lou for a first rounder !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Karlsson Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I posted this in another thread. I've heard rumours of Schneids to Columbus for Jack Johnson or Moore, plus their first pick in this years draft...which could be number one overall. That first overall from Columbus could be huge. And in case you aren't familiar with the talent at the top of this years draft, here are the top two rated by Central Scouting: 1. LW Nail Yakupov – Sarnia (OHL): 2. LC Mikhail Grigorenko – Quebec (QMJHL): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I posted this in another thread. I've heard rumours of Schneids to Columbus for Jack Johnson or Moore, plus their first pick in this years draft...which could be number one overall. That first overall from Columbus could be huge. And in case you aren't familiar with the talent at the top of this years draft, here are the top two rated by Central Scouting: 1. LW Nail Yakupov – Sarnia (OHL): 2. LC Mikhail Grigorenko – Quebec (QMJHL): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Brown Burrows Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 They're not brothers. They're not even related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Thread title. This idea has been running thru my mind lately and now that Cody is gone and Raymond is still around, I feel like someone needs to replace Mayray. Assuming Cory is equal in value with Landeskog, this trade is a huge possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECross Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 As a Colorado fan living in BC, I watch both the Avalanche and the Canucks very frequently. First, Landeskog is THE player on Colorado. He plays in every situation. How many rookies out there are consistently relied on to deliver whether up a goal or down a goal at any moment during a game? He has become the leader of an NHL franchise at 19 years of age, and I will be very surprised if he is not the next captain of the Avalanche. I cannot overstate the worth that he has; barring injuries or unforseen stalls in development, this kid is going to be an elite NHL player. Simply put, he does everything. Coming from the perspective of outside the Canuck fanbase, and yet still watching Schneider play, this is what I think: Yes he is a good goalie, no question. But he is nowhere close to the same value as Gabriel Landeskog. To think so is either from just not knowing enough about Landeskog, or being completely biased. I am willing to bet that Colorado holds Semyon Varlamov's value higher than Schneider's anyway. Gabriel Landeskog is the centrepiece of the Colorado Avalanche, and nothing is going to be enough to lure him away. This trade proposal is as far-fetched as I have seen in a long while, and I don't mean any disrespect by that; I am trying to be as objective as possible when rating these two players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Doughty Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 May Ray for Landeskog?? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Bob.Loblaw Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 no way we trade him to the avs.. and they got varlamov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 18, 2012 Share Posted March 18, 2012 Landeskog is an Ovechkin type player, and he could reach that level. Ovechkin was a force in his rookie year, Landeskog doesn't exactly have the same pedigree either, but is a much more responsible and well composed. Ovechkin is more of a "loose cannon". Landeskog should be a captain, Ovechkin should not. Landeskog is also miles better defensively than Ovechkin was in his rookie year, although Landeskog was brought up in the North American system so that isn't a very fair comparison. What are your thoughts? This is just my analysis after watching them both. My point is though, if Landeskog was on the table for Schneider I would take it and never look back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palindrom Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Colorado is a division rival, if they want Schneider they will have to overpay: Landeskog+++ for Schneider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Cory is worth one of top eight pick and one 20-25 pick. So, essentially he's worth both of Tampa's picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danthecanucksfan Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 why trade Schneider to a divisional team, but landeskog would be great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Anyone who thinks the value of Schneider is close to Gabriel Landeskog needs do remove the homer glasses. Landeskog is on a different level than Schneider entirely, Edmonton was stupid not to draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nowhereman Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Landeskog is an Ovechkin type player, and he could reach that level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Colorado is a division rival, if they want Schneider they will have to overpay: Landeskog+++ for Schneider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baercheese Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Anyone who thinks the value of Schneider is close to Gabriel Landeskog needs do remove the homer glasses. Landeskog is on a different level than Schneider entirely, Edmonton was stupid not to draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.