elvis15 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 i dont know how to quote your quote, elvis, but that is an outstanding story about the hell chemistry question... that guy should quit his chemistry deal and get a job writing for the daily show with jon stewart. he's got the perfect mind for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 But look, the thread is no longer bickering back and forth but rather a lot more fun. Now once we get some Luongo news we can get back on topic rather than poetry and jokes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Shirokov Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 A lot of people don't remember, but Schneider and Luongo were probably the best canucks for a lot of last season. When the offense died down after the midway point, Luongo and Schneider won us a lot of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 A lot of people don't remember, but Schneider and Luongo were probably the best canucks for a lot of last season. When the offense died down after the midway point, Luongo and Schneider won us a lot of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 In theory could Edler Raymond and Luongo be packaged to a team to achieve a greater return than just luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 In theory could Edler Raymond and Luongo be packaged to a team to achieve a greater return than just luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4 For example doesn't this look appealing? To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4 For example doesn't this look appealing? To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Why? That fills a lot of our holes??? That or if he ends up in Florida ( although I don't think tallon is interested ) is Van: Edler, lui and Raymond Fla: gudbranson, Matthias and bjugstad and a pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowelPower12 Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Anyone who throws Edler into one of their proposals is retarded, the Canucks are not trading him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberries Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 That's freaking disgusting. Slap yourself and hang yourself afterwards you were clearly inbred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4 For example doesn't this look appealing? To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Take Seabrook off Chicago and they become too small; one of our recent D problems. Seabrook will not be traded by Chicago unless they recover another big D. Exactly why we need someone like him back if we give up Edler. I like that you are attending to our needs; but the deal will not go down for that reason! Take out Edler, Gunnarsson and Franson and Luongo could probably get that on his own. I think this would be more appealing To Vancouver: Johan Franzen + 2013 1st To Detroit: Alex Edler + Keith Ballard Edler gives Detroit that 'Lidstrom replacement', and Ballard solidifys their D core Edler - Kronwall Ballard - Ericsson Quincey - Smith then To Vancouver: Brent Seabrook To Chicago: Roberto Luongo + Mason Raymond + 2013 2nd Sedin - Sedin - Franzen (this would be an epic line in the playoffs) Burrows - Kesler - Booth Higgins - Lapierre - Kassian Volpatti - Malhotra - Hansen Hamhuis - Seabrook Bieksa - Garrison Connauton - Tanev Schneider Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Franzen is interesting, although he has a lifetime contract as well - 8 more years at 4 million cap hit. (expires when he is 40, salary starts dipping at 37/8)... Wouldn't give up Edler for him though, and wouldn't want to see Edler in Detroit. Let the hole in the blueline remain, or fill it with a Leaf. To Van - Franzen To Toronto - Luongo To Detroit - too bad the Leafs blueline is so pathetic...can't see Holland finding what he wants there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 With lui and Edler I could see a top pick or prospect, top 4 d, depth Dman and top 9 forward . Basically 2 players for 4 For example doesn't this look appealing? To van: Franson, Gunnarson, colborne, Kulemin To toronto: luongo, Edler, Raymond or cond pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Never trade Edler??? Should of said that about Hodgson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Why? That fills a lot of our holes??? That or if he ends up in Florida ( although I don't think tallon is interested ) is Van: Edler, lui and Raymond Fla: gudbranson, Matthias and bjugstad and a pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remy Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Never trade Edler??? Should of said that about Hodgson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Never trade Edler??? Should of said that about Hodgson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted September 22, 2012 Share Posted September 22, 2012 Tweets from Botch today: @taj1944 @samjam99 thanks for clarifying, and for the record I have TO, chi and a mystery team who arrived late to the party @botchford who is this mystery team? San Jose? Anahiem? Edmonton? Am I close? @CanuckleSmith can't say I'm 100% sure but one of those would be a good guess Says right now, TO/Chi/Mystery are the teams involved. Wonder who mystery team is? Other read: http://www.bergerbytes.ca/2012/09/burke-not-content-with-leafs/ TORONTO (Sep. 20) – For Brian Burke, the summer of 2012 has been all about tempering expectation. The Maple Leafs’ general manager made a couple of modest additions and suggested – rather strongly – that no further altering will be done. That isn’t so, according to an Eastern Conference rival. “From my standpoint, Brian is poised to make at least one prime acquisition… possibly two,” said the fellow executive. “I think – like many of us – he is waiting to see the lay of the land once a new Collective Bargaining Agreement is in place. He’s been very involved in trying to improve his goaltending and I can tell you that he’s determined to add a big player up front. I’ll be quite surprised, as will many of my colleagues, if he goes into the next hockey season without a significant upgrade.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.