NotMyBurroughs Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 I'm not really sure what to think of the whole Kesler CL thing. Vote ilduce. The way he posts would make it very easy to be active and not come off as very suspicious as it will be very similar. Link to comment
CanucksLegacy Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 On the serial kill hitlist: 1. Alchemy Time - seems suspicious majority of the time 2. kumar2013 - clueless 99% of the time, tends to originally vote for people that have already been lynched. Even if he was TP, wouldn't be much of a loss. 3. King Heffy - King Pin? 5. VICanucksfan5551 - sneaky, sneaky, very smart 6. Ilduce39 - dictator 7. Go Faulk Yourself - I will not Faulk myself 8. Burrdaman - dangerous 9. Kryten - what a kryten 10. CanucksLegacy - being too honest 11. Not A Fruit - not a fruit -> Not a TP? 12. Intoewsables - spared if you confirm you will commish CDC hax for winter break 13. OurTimeToShine - OTTS pls 14. Aladeen - has not given me the Aladeen lapdance 15. JE14 - JE pls 16. Lemons - how else am I gonna make lemonade if the lemons are still whole? 17. MikeyBoy44 - suspicious name Basically everyone but sheriff. I'm getting KESLER to aid the decision making. ODDS we get a Mafia are slim, but still worth a shot. Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 I'm not really sure what to think of the whole Kesler CL thing. Vote ilduce. The way he posts would make it very easy to be active and not come off as very suspicious as it will be very similar. Uh, what? Ilduce's played one game so far and he's been more active than you've ever been IIRC. Definitely more active in this thread so far as well. Pretty odd bandwagon post aside from this as well... Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 I should've add a couple more "as wells" into that post. HNNNNGGGGGGG Link to comment
NotMyBurroughs Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Uh, what? Ilduce's played one game so far and he's been more active than you've ever been IIRC. Definitely more active in this thread so far as well. Pretty odd bandwagon post aside from this as well... I mean it in the sense of all of his posts are very in character. Just seems like it be very easy for him to be active as a mafia when he was already active last round. Does that make sense to anyone but me :/ Link to comment
Aladeen Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 unvote canuckslegacy he would have died from the ecstasy of the lap dance anyways. vote ilduce for the reason I voted for him initially. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Just a normal TP I seriously doubt that Kes is the sheriff... He has tried to be the sheriff too many times This post sets off my suspicion meter. Then again, NAF tends to do that with me often (KH and BW tend to do the same). Uh, what? Ilduce's played one game so far and he's been more active than you've ever been IIRC. Definitely more active in this thread so far as well. Pretty odd bandwagon post aside from this as well... Agreed. Reminds me a little of her post calling out Gally from a couple games ago. I warned you about that last game, BDM Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Referring to This post sets off my suspicion meter. Then again, NAF tends to do that with me often (KH and BW tend to do the same). Agreed. Reminds me a little of her post calling out Gally from a couple games ago. I warned you about that last game, BDM Referring to the last bit of Toews' post. I got what she was saying about ilduce's character making it easy for him to blend in regardless of his role. Not exactly a good reason to vote for him. Link to comment
Drouin Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 kumar2013 - clueless 99% of the time, tends to originally vote for people that have already been lynched. Even if he was TP, ouch Link to comment
ilduce39 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 I mean it in the sense of all of his posts are very in character. Just seems like it be very easy for him to be active as a mafia when he was already active last round. Does that make sense to anyone but me :/ No it makes sense I even think I said that was one of my reasons for being so verbose last round... was hoping to be Mafia this time around and stir the pot. I'm not, however - though it seems too early in the game to prove it. Link to comment
NotMyBurroughs Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Referring to Referring to the last bit of Toews' post. I got what she was saying about ilduce's character making it easy for him to blend in regardless of his role. Not exactly a good reason to vote for him. It's as good of a reason I need in the first round. Especially when its already between only really 2 at this point and one was already on my suspicious list. Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 I mean it in the sense of all of his posts are very in character. Just seems like it be very easy for him to be active as a mafia when he was already active last round. Does that make sense to anyone but me :/ He's had a lot of joke posts "in character", but he's also been contributing a lot to the discussion so far. Kind of seems like you're reaching for a reason to vote for him. Link to comment
Höglander87 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 BJ seems awfully defensive of ildeuce Link to comment
NotMyBurroughs Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 He's had a lot of joke posts "in character", but he's also been contributing a lot to the discussion so far. Kind of seems like you're reaching for a reason to vote for him. He just agreed saying he can see how it comes across that way.. Isn't reaching for a reason kind of common in the first round. I felt like actually adding a reason instead of no reason with a vote. Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 BJ seems awfully defensive of ildeuce Yeah, I want to make it as obvious as possible that we're on the same team. He just agreed saying he can see how it comes across that way.. Isn't reaching for a reason kind of common in the first round. I felt like actually adding a reason instead of no reason with a vote. So did I...? Reaching for a reason like that wouldn't be as suspicious if it wasn't a bandwagon vote. His vote seems to be picking up steam for no particular reason, so it's natural to expect that Mafia are bandwagoning on. You just happened to be the only one that tried to cover it up with shady reasoning. If ilduce gets voted out and comes up TP, the focus will turn to the others as well. Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 On the serial kill hitlist: 1. Alchemy Time - seems suspicious majority of the time um... lol? Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 It's as good of a reason I need in the first round. Especially when its already between only really 2 at this point and one was already on my suspicious list. It being the first round isn't justification to jump on bandwagons with paper-thin justification. It's still ridiculously early in this round, so it's not like it's been reduced to only two options with no hope of a shift before the deadline. Link to comment
Alchemy Time Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 You wanna waste your kill on a basic TP? Your loss. Link to comment
ilduce39 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 For the record, the regime appreciates the sober second thought of VI and Toews - if this band of patriots cast a stone at a likely villain, Il Duce shall join in. Unvote CanucksLegacy Link to comment
ilduce39 Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Not exactly a brilliant "mafia plot" to openly defend someone (if they were Mafia) who seems destined for the gallows in the first round, is it? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.