JoshuaGuy Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Yup....tougher being hard to beat when you're... Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik Kesler Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Not sure what you mean by that. Richardson doesn't need to be propped up. He's been one of the best, most consistent Canucks this year. Possession-wise, he drags down Booth and Kassian. I like Richie, but he really isn't meant to be playing 14+ minutes a night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Devorski perceives that as a "crosscheck"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slegr Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Lack is being stellar. But why is Luongo on the bench? I thought his butt would be sore from all the sitting in Sochi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaGuy Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Devorski perceives that as a "crosscheck"? You knew a weak call was coming. Penalties were 3-0. Not a conspiracy thing, just stupid how they feel the need to even things out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Great kill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I can't decide if Beukeboom or Shattenkirk is a better last name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raspberries Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 will the Canucks ever score again?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Possession-wise, he drags down Booth and Kassian. I like Richie, but he really isn't meant to be playing 14+ minutes a night. Still not sure what you mean by "possession wise" he drags them down. Richardson's puck possession numbers are very good. He gets 31% offensive zone starts, produces 43% finishes, he has a +7 turnover differential, he wins 53.5% of his faceoffs - if you're talking about his corsi-on or relative corsi they don't mean anything unless they're taken in context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Like Diaz way better than Edler there. Not as powerful but he looks like he wants to be there and he is aware of what the other team might be afraid of ... at every second I might add Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 will the Canucks ever score again?? Jesus christ people. It's 0-0, come down from the ???? ledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cucumber Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Burrows will score... In the SO tho Hope tho it is in regulation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Kassian with a nice pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Lack first star? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamu101 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Plz Canucks a goal is all I need to enjoy my night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Kassian with a nice pass Attaboy Surfer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slegr Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 They look flat. I thought the break would give them new life. If this is desperation hockey, we might be sunk this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I can't decide if Beukeboom or Shattenkirk is a better last name. How about Klinkhammer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Still not sure what you mean by "possession wise" he drags them down. Richardson's puck possession numbers are very good. He gets 31% offensive zone starts, produces 43% finishes, he has a +7 turnover differential, he wins 53.5% of his faceoffs - if you're talking about his corsi-on or relative corsi they don't mean anything unless they're taken in context. There are players that have different agendas you know. If the corsi were spot on and players were robots there would be no need to have this discussion. It's very conceivalble stats will be all out proprotion dependeding on what they do. Quantiyfying players like you do screams of a desperate attempt to explain what you don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamu101 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 C'mon boys enlighten my day Lack made my day but can the rest of u please follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.