Ilya Mikheyev Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 I bet loser of Kesler sweepstakes between Philly & Pitts will cont. discussions with Canucks for Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinkaruk98 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 What happened to Pouliot? yesterday that was the center piece of the deal. Now we're hearing guys like Despres, Dumoulin being the center piece? Hang the phone up Gillis, go call Philly and try to pry some of their prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JE14 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Hossa got injured today. You'd have to think the Hawks would up their interest if he's out long term. Imagine Sharp-Toews and Kane-Kesler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Stephane Gonzalez ‏@stephgonzz 1m Si l'offre de PIT pour Kesler est réelle, quel est l'équivalent à MTL? Eller,Beaulieu et un 1st pick? Le feriez vous pour Kesler? #onjasela Add tinordi otherwise no way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Why? It's not nearly enough.. and topping it could be as little as changing the 3rd to a 2nd. Still not a good deal. I only say that because it's such a bad deal for Gillis and the org. Basically telling 28 other GMs this is the trash I am being offered, start bidding gentlemen. Because really that is a terrible deal. Like us offering Gaunce Higgins and a couple of picks for say E.Kane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan kesler the beast Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Fire gillis haha sutter better not happen. Give us Neal OR Kuntiz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyShackleford Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 How about a fair hockey trade Kesler+Edler for Plekanec+Subban...MTL has had known intrest in 17 and 23 and I think MTL is willing to move pk. Also I would want Sutter+Bennet+Harrington as well as draft picks in a deal with PIT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodos Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Fire gillis haha sutter better not happen. Give us Neal OR Kuntiz Gigantic no thanks to Kunitz. Are you kidding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodos Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Or should I say "Kuntiz" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 please Saad+ Teraivanen instead Saad won't have Kane, Toews, Hossa, Sharp and Keith to inflate his stats here. That's a trash deal for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Burrows 14 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Keeler is worth more then staal and staal got a potential 2nd line center, 8th overall I believe and a good d prospect. Meaning we could get a top prospect, a 2nd line center and a d prospect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatsPajamas Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Keeler is worth more then staal and staal got a potential 2nd line center, 8th overall I believe and a good d prospect. Meaning we could get a top prospect, a 2nd line center and a d prospect And Staal was a ticking time bomb. He didn't want to resign and everyone knew it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexEdler11 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 2m Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick. Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 1m Now, that isn't to say VAN couldn't take D instead of F prospect but more pressing need is up front. May just mean having to move a D later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan kesler the beast Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Or should I say "Kuntiz" Him or sutter if you had too pick ? That was my point lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winthecup Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 2m Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick. Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 1m Now, that isn't to say VAN couldn't take D instead of F prospect but more pressing need is up front. May just mean having to move a D later. Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 2m Now, that isn't to say VAN couldn't take D instead of F prospect but more pressing need is up front. May just mean having to move a D later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Fire gillis haha sutter better not happen. Give us Neal OR Kuntiz More like fire Shero because he's lowballing so hard that he's a huge dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JE14 Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 2m Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick. Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 1m Now, that isn't to say VAN couldn't take D instead of F prospect but more pressing need is up front. May just mean having to move a D later. THANK YOU GILLIS. STICK TO THIS. DON'T TRADE HIM FOR LESS. Schenn, Laughton, 1st is seeming like a realistic deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Bob Mackenzie says @TSNBobMcKenzie: Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick. @TSNBobMcKenzie: Now, that isn't to say VAN couldn't take D instead of F prospect but more pressing need is up front. May just mean having to move a D later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick. And it should be no less than that. Philly: Simmonds, Hagg/Laughton, 1st Pittsburgh: Bennett, Maatta, 1st Columbus: Jenner, Rychel, 1st Detroit: Helm, Nyquist/Mantha, Sproul, 1st IMHO Kesler doesn't go to Pittsburgh unless Maatta is coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m Price to get Kesler is high. 1. Significant/established NHLer, preferably a C, 20 to 25; 2. Top prospect, preferably a F. 3. 1st rd pick. Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 1m Now, that isn't to say VAN couldn't take D instead of F prospect but more pressing need is up front. May just mean having to move a D later. Sounds like sutter, depres and a 1st for me. Johansen, Murray and a 1st would be amazing but won't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.