JustABandwagoner Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Conditional Haha totally. Plus WPG takes on 50% of Kane's salary!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Keep in mind that Eklund said "over the next week or so". It's been well over a week since he said that. Just sayin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Just a thought ; what if Kassian was traded for Kane? 1-1 deal. Id do it. Kane can do more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Just a thought ; what if Kassian was traded for Kane? 1-1 deal. Id do it. Kane can do more Winnipeg already have a player that is infinitely more talented than Zack Kassian, his name is Blake Wheeler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunchy the Tiger Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 More like Kassian ,Burrows & 1st . Anything less won't do it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Just a thought ; what if Kassian was traded for Kane? 1-1 deal. Id do it. Kane can do more Just a thought - if Kane can do more, why would the Jets offer him 1-1 for Kassian? I've suggested a couple packages with Kassian for Kane, but obviously the Canucks need to offer more than just him for the Jets to even consider it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Kassian-Burrows- Conditional 2016 1st round pick (Turns into second rd pick if the Canucks don't make the playoffs) for Evander Kane ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Kassian-Burrows- Conditional 2016 1st round pick (Turns into second rd pick if the Canucks don't make the playoffs) for Evander Kane ? I would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 More like Kassian ,Burrows & 1st . Anything less won't do it . Kassian-Burrows- Conditional 2016 1st round pick (Turns into second rd pick if the Canucks don't make the playoffs) for Evander Kane ? I would Leaving us with Vrbata and Grenier and Hansen as our RW's and RW depth... Brilliant. Let's throw in a 3rd as well to facilitate that deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Well, we have this guy named Nicklas Jensen, and this other guy named Derek Dorsett to play right wing as well. Just sayin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Well, we have this guy names Nicklas Jensen, and this other guy named Derek Dorsett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Sorry about the double post. Still new and trying to figure it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Vey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2SKATES1STICK Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Honestly we do not need E. Kane. There are better options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Big buff, Kane and Ladd for Hansen, Edler, Kassian and Ericsson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2SKATES1STICK Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Big buff, Kane and Ladd for Hansen, Edler, Kassian and Ericsson? lol, why not just offer Sestito straight up for all 3? just as likely as being accepted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Big buff, Kane and Ladd for Hansen, Edler, Kassian and Ericsson? Did you hit your head before you typed this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Just a thought - if Kane can do more, why would the Jets offer him 1-1 for Kassian? I've suggested a couple packages with Kassian for Kane, but obviously the Canucks need to offer more than just him for the Jets to even consider it. Why on Earth would the Canucks trade Kassian? He's just coming into his own and we're talking Bertuzzi comparison. This tank for McDavid has GOT. to stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl's Jn Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 thats the problem! kassian is bertuzzi comparison .... he becomes invisible on most nights.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Why on Earth would the Canucks trade Kassian? He's just coming into his own and we're talking Bertuzzi comparison. This tank for McDavid has GOT. to stop. Why on earth WOULDN'T the Canucks trade Kassian if it could land them a better player? Kane has scored 4 times more goals and points in only a little over twice as many games. Not only that, but Evander is over 6 months younger than Kassian. So if Kassian is "just coming into his own", isn't it reasonable to assume Kane has more to give too? What would IMPROVING the team be equated with tanking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.