Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

A good post


Recommended Posts

Or you could actually post the article....

It has been a interesting week or so in Canuckleville. After the Taco Kid got traded, the Twitterati lost their minds for a while. Jim Benning was suddenly inept at a job he has done all his life. The man was literally born into hockey, with a father as a scout. None of that mattered to that small loud segment of our fanbase that by their volume gets an outsized portion of the attention. Or so it seems. Here at NM, we try to be open to one and all, regardless. Things like narratives and ( especially and ) our sports media's insatiable desire to pander to that small loud segment are less important. It is the loud voice that sometimes gets all the attention, ( see Trump, Donald ), but it is not the only voice.

But I am telling you nothing new. As someone who was six when the team played it's first year ( and I lived in the Interior. You want to talk about the "Canuck Tea Party". There is a rabid, purer strain in many of the small, hockey mad towns in this province ), and having been a fan ever since, I have met many of the aforementioned. I love them. They are friends and family. I just choose to not do it anymore. Especially in the offseason, when everything is supposition.

Now, don't get me wrong here. I am as passionate a Canuck fan as those season ticket holders ( or, those that used their invites to the Summer Summit thingie ) that took all of nine minutes to chant Eddie Lack's name, and boo in the face of their GM when they found out that there were calls on Ryan Miller. ( "You mean we could have traded Miller and kept the beloved Eddie" BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO......." )

If Eddie Lack is indeed "thought of as a back up around the NHL"", then no amount of winning Twitter and being a media darling will change that until he does it on the ice. Look at the guy the Oilers got for more than what the Canucks got for the guy that Canuck fans fell in love with . Fell for Eddie so much that the first thing they wanted to do after the chicken dinner was find a reason to get mad and boo the guy that traded him.

Cam Talbot - 57 GP, 2.00 GAA, and a .931 in the NHL, and a career record of 33-15-5.

Eddie Lack - 82 career appearances, a 2.43 and .917, and he was 34-30 and 9 with the Canucks.

Even factoring in the fact that New York was a much better defensive team this year than the Canucks, one line looks like a guy you would pay for, while the other put up back up numbers.

I totally get it though. I fell in love with Eddie Lack myself. Part of it was the way he grabbed the spotlight that often burns too hot for goaltenders in this town and owned it like no one has since Gary Smith. ( Seriously kids, google "Suitcase Smith". Dude co-won a Vezina here, and got traded sooner than you would think a Vezina guy should because he compared the owner's daughter's looks to one of his horses at a party. He was a pretty unique guy as well ). The way that he did perform when the starter was injured was certainly decent. When they lost some of those games, I remember recapping how "you could not blame it on the goaltender ". So, the reasons behind getting vocal at the GM, I can understand them, especially in this town. But those numbers don't lie either.

None of the moves the GM made this year were that bad. They were just different, ( and tougher because the players involved were all popular ) because they fulfilled different needs, and because they address different needs. That seems pretty progressive. Like the hiring of Rick Celebrini as "director of rehabilitation". The Canucks have often been cutting edge, and hiring one of the best guys in his field to head a team that includes a long time assistant promoted to a "head trainer" position, while still looking for another strength coach to join Takahashi's team is certainly a different way of organizing that aspect of the team.

They spent time with the San Antonio Spurs this off season to learn how that team has sustained such a high level of performance from their aging ( yet still performing way better than the "experts" think they should with those aging stars. Tim Duncan is a freak ! ) core. The team will have an "entire team" approach to the health and care of their team, just like Mike Gillis had his "sleep chamber" with this reorganization.

But all the media mavens in this town saw was the firing of Mike Burnstein after getting rid of Gilman, Crawford and Henning. All they could see was another easy opportunity to stir up that one segment of the fanbase they know they can always get riled. Sad, huh ?

So, that was another of the moves. How about the Bieksa deal instead ? That is one that that certainly divided the fanbase. Folks were a little more rational on that one after a while, as the return is OK for a 34 year old on an expiring contract. But Kevin Bieksa was so much more than that here. He was an icon. He was one of the guys that the media always turned to, because he is an awesome quote, and an honest one. His charity work is amazing, turning the tragedy of his close friend on the team into a way to help people who really need that help. There is a reason why, when facing the wall of all the jerseys with their numbers and nameplates, I spent my $200+ on #3.

Even while I struggled with it in his autopsy because of that, it was pretty easy to see that deal was probably going to happen. Corrado and Clendening needed spots ( the loser in that battle of right handed defensemen for KB3's spot will probably take the spot Ryan Stanton vacates as a waived player. They will still make the team, just have to watch the waistline with all that press box popcorn available.

So, so far Jim Benning is two for three. Three for three if you buy into the company line about Brisebois being the "guy we wanted" if they had gotten the second round pick the masses demanded as a "reasonable price" for Saint Eddie. Even if you don't, the more I learnt about him after he was drafted, I am willing to cut JB some slack on that deal. The goalie market is always weird anyhow. And the trade market does not have a column for "media savvy" when it comes to adding up the pluses and minuses to make a trade in today's NHL.

Whether he went three for four, or ".500" depends not only how you view the Lack deal ( and it is not a coincidence that the same tongues wagging on one were wagging on the other over at CA, and amongst the twitterati ), but how you feel about acquiring Brandon Prust. For the record, I would have done that deal straight up, but getting a pick ( 5th round ) is always nice. Why ? Well, big Zack certainly showed he has talent, but he just cannot, right now, harness that talent on a consistent basis. In return, the Canucks got a very, very good PKer, a bottom six stalwart, and a player who is the poster child for consistency. They gave up the "appearance" of talent for the certainty of performance that is Prust's calling card. With enough youth in the pipeline now to replace that promise ( and, it is Zack who is like a Rorchadt Test for Canuck fans. Some see Todd Bertuzzi, some see Alex Stojanov ), the Canucks moved a headache and got good return. That is a win for me.

I like Matt Bartkowski, even if that means the twitter tongues wag about "see, he is trying to make the Bruins here!". He has speed, and I, again, have enough trust in this GM's ability to assess hockey horseflesh to allay my final judgement until, you know, we actually see the team play. Taylor Fedun was a pretty good prospect, just making the NHL before he broke his leg in that horrible play that changed the icing rules in the NHL. Richard Bachman may only play in the AHL, but has played enough in the NHL to be a decent "injury callup" to fill that need. The way JB signed Yannick Weber while avoiding arbitration was a nice piece of business as well. So, the free agent signing and other business has been professional and understandable.

So, what is the problem ? What happened to the guy folks were falling all over themselves to hate on Gillis for ? Maybe nothing ? It certainly was not his draft class this year, as the Canucks seemed to pickup some very good players. Seriously, the more I read and watch on Youtube about Zhukenov and Jasek, I wonder how the team managed to get them where they did ! Our second generation scout had another good draft, by most reports.

Perhaps the deals were not that bad in retrospect ? Perhaps Canuck fans ( all over B.C ) were just crankier than usual because it has been so damn hot recently. All I know is, once the T.O media (Tim and Sid is my bet ) gets ahold of the tape of the season ticket folks giving JB the business, it will all be about the same lame jokes and "look at these guys".

From a fanbase and city that suck so hard Oiler fans feel sorry for them, while judging a team that, for all the changes and "getting younger", has clearly been the one with the best record over the last twenty years in Canada. That is our cross to bear people. Even if those folks are more worthy of your pity than your response, pithy though it inevitably would be, even THEY can throw up the "No Cups" thing. Sure, it was a Black and White, six team, two round Cup ( kind of like getting to the third round now ), but...well, you know.

That is what we want, right ? As the team progresses along the path of "retool", rebuild", "getting younger", or just remaining competitive while bringing in new blood, like every good team does ( see Detroit ), opinions will vary. I know it might be an unpopular opinion right now, but I honestly don't get the hub-bub. I liked Eddie Lack as much as anyone, but even that underwhelming to some deal was not THAT bad.

But then I have never been a "tar and pitchforks" guy. Or, at least I have not been that guy for a long long time !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantastic read !

Really belittles the uneducated fans w. Big mouths and a quick trigger finger of blame.

I have full trust in Benning especially his eye for scouting which is perfect because scouting and developing is what will make us competitive and relevant again in the future.

I for one won't stand for the disgraceful losing and tanking that the Oilers and Sabers did. 10 yrs of sucking is not in my blood !

Retool on the fly ! Keep some veterans and character players to.mentor our youths to show them how to be professionals. Add grit so that our young guys don't get bullied on the ice. Put somewhat a competitive environment so that losing doesn't become part of the youths culture. Give them a Taste of competing and winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another cdc poster throwing his two cents review in, blog form.

No wait, it's an article. :shock:

"vancityDan" certainly appears to a credible name for a knowledgeable sports writer. Many don't get that pretty much any schmoe can be a blogger. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another cdc poster throwing his two cents review in, blog form.

People should understand more than if the fans are complaining about, or even noticing, all these moves being done during this time of year, THAT'S GOOD!!!

What the team doesn't want to hear is silence.

I can't take anything you say seriously when it comes to managing this team with your signature -_- (this seasons and last seasons)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This regime is all about the prospects PROSPECTS. Who cares who gets traded out of the core, benning has done one thing in that he will never trade our top drafted prospects. Give him a 5 year period and lets see how this pans out, doesnt matter what else we do to the main NHL core, its whether we develop our own guys into NHL caliber players.

Good article, keep up the good work OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hilarity of it all is that if and when the rebuild fails to deliver, it will be the fans who are to blame.

At which point the Canucks will have no choice but to fire the fans.

Meanwhile, at Canucks HQ...


"This fool has unwittingly stumbled onto our plan! EX-TERM-IN-ATE! EX-TERM-IN-ATE!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that a "good" article would not have said that we got a 5th round pick, when we actually gave one up.

Other than that, it basically looked like a cheerleading blog. I thought maybe apollo had branched out...

LOL he hasnt replied to this post yet, seems awfully suspicious :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with many of the points the op made; bieksa brought a decent return, the lack deal was a little low, but not low enough to warrant all the anti jb garbage, and that zk had worn out his welcome here - in fact, what i don't get about the zk trade is how much of a free ride zk recieved from the fans. i heard him say after he was traded that he "didn't give it his all while he was here." WTF! of course we are probably going to loose this trade in terms of talent, but sometimes a team has to loose a trade to move forward as a team; addition by subtraction.

while i totally agree with jb's vision to move to a younger lineup, it does beg a very important question; is the young talent good enough to bring cup success? personally, after decades of following the draft and speculating about this guy and that, i now take a wait and see attitude. it's here that jb and tl will define themselves; if these prospects are just average, then we are in for years of pain, but if we have some more guys like horvat, who really surprised me last year with his play, then it could be like the transition from the naslund team to the sedins, relatively quick and painless.

on a related issue, my biggest gripe from the last week or so was that we weren't in on the oshie deal. we need to get a younger skilled top 6, and oshie could have been part of that. other than horvat, as of right now, we don't have anyone else who will be a top 6 player in 3-4 years. don't even get me started on the hamilton deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with many of the points the op made; bieksa brought a decent return, the lack deal was a little low, but not low enough to warrant all the anti jb garbage,

It was a lot low.

When you look at the return Ottawa got for Robin Lehner, the deal for Lack looks terrible. Yes, the Sens "threw in" David Legwand, but what Canuck fan wouldn't have happily thrown in Chris Higgins to get a first round pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...