Salmonberries Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 1 hour ago, DeNiro said: Pretty much. If we could get a serviceable former 2nd round player for free, it would lessen the loss of the 2nd we gave up for Vey. Yes, and unlike Vey, Ferrarro actually is a fit in the bottom six; he can skate, he can check, and he can move around positionally and throughout the lineup. It makes sense to put a claim in on claim him or someone similar to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 2 hours ago, cripplereh said: I'd take Granberg for sure at this time and then try to trade for Hamonic and when all are healthy either make a trade for room of waiver weber! Actually having Granberg helps make it more palatable to do a Tanev for Hamonic swap to me. A little needed depth and a defensive presence with a little physicality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 The one thing that confuses me is it seems Granberg was just coming back from injury and hasn't played yet, so wouldn't he be a candidate for a conditioning assignment? Or did we miss that already and now he either has to be put back on the roster or put on waivers? But very little offence out of him ever until a bit of a burst last year. Definitely meant to be strong defensively and as a RHD I think he'd be a good pickup if we have the roster space right now. I think we have some room to improve on D and if there's opportunity for a trade there then it might be worthwhile longer term as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 It's not as if we're getting much offense from the back end as it is, outside of Hutton. If we can get some more size and grit back there along with some defensive stability I'm all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl's Jn Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 10 hours ago, Zerox said: Yeah, let's take Granberg from the Leafs for stealing Corrado from us. Screw the leafs. not really stealing when we put him up for grabs in the first place...but i like the idea of screwing with the leafs.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl's Jn Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 5 hours ago, DeNiro said: I'd rather not trade Hansen. Better to trade Higgins. I think he would take Cracknell's spot if we were to claim him. not hansen... he is our savior right now playing with the twins... that line is magic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 16 hours ago, Teemu Selänne said: It's always a bit risky to lose your place in the waiver-wire line-up, yes because the NHL uses fantasy rules for waiver wire pickups... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 Any word in these guys yet. I hope we make a grab at granberg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaGuy Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 Nashville claims the dman? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakyWalton Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 48 minutes ago, shayster007 said: Any word in these guys yet. I hope we make a grab at granberg. Grannberg to Nashville and Ferraro to Boston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerox Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 Those 2 are way too good to pass waivers. They are both gone guys. Granberg is really good defensively, just like Mattias Ohlund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 4 minutes ago, ShakyWalton said: Grannberg to Nashville and Ferraro to Boston. That's disappointing... So GMJMFB didn't even try to claim him eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 No point claiming a guy if he's not going to play on your team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyg43 Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 Just now, shayster007 said: That's disappointing... So GMJMFB didn't even try to claim him eh? He must have a trick up his sleeve maybie he plans to pull a rabbit out of his hat. That tough I was even hoping one of the two would fall to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 15 minutes ago, ShakyWalton said: Grannberg to Nashville and Ferraro to Boston. Will those teams need to put someone on waivers now to fit in the new guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 10 minutes ago, Crabcakes said: No point claiming a guy if he's not going to play on your team. I'm not usually an eye for an eye kinda guy, but in this case I was hoping we would take Grannberg.. Toronto took our young righty leaving us with a pretty obvious hole in our prospect pool, this could have helped fill it slightly and added some depth. I would have also loved to seen GMJMFB exercise some cheekyness and have sent him down for a conditioning stint. How could the league have possibly rejected it? And Weber has been pretty bad this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: Will those teams need to put someone on waivers now to fit in the new guys? Not if they have players on 2 way contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 1 minute ago, shayster007 said: Not if they have players on 2 way contracts. Does that mean we could send Baer down if he was on a two way instead of a one way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 Just now, Alflives said: Does that mean we could send Baer down if he was on a two way instead of a one way? If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we would likely have a much harder team to play against. And yes, that is what it means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 Just now, shayster007 said: If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we would likely have a much harder team to play against. And yes, that is what it means. Why then, do we not sign these guy - Corrado - to two way deals? If they are restricted free agents, don't we have the hammer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.