73 Percent Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Not one to start many topics but i thought this may be something worth discussing. By now everyone should know that we will be picking from 1-6. That narrows the players were lookig at to about 8-10. Of the players that we will likely be picking what are their odds of playing with the big club next season? 1. Mathews-100% 2. Laine-100% 3. Puljujarvi- 90% 4. Tkatchuk- 40% 5. Dubois- 25% 6. Nylander- 40% 7. Sergachev- 5% 8. Chyrchrun- 35% 9. Juolevi -25% Let me know what you guys think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 I think this belongs in the draft thread just like the 5 other threads about the draft........ Matthew 100% Laine 100% Puljujarvi 100% Tkachuk 60% Dubois 10% Sergachev 0% Chychurn 70% Juolevi 50% Nylander 10% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted April 11, 2016 Author Share Posted April 11, 2016 Just now, Gstank29 said: I think this belongs in the draft thread just like the 5 other threads about the draft........ Matthew 100% Laine 100% Puljujarvi 100% Tkachuk 60% Dubois 10% Sergachev 0% Chychurn 70% Juolevi 50% Nylander 10% My bad. Mods please move. I dont normally make threads. This seemed like an appropriate place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Gooseberries said: Not one to start many topics but i thought this may be something worth discussing. By now everyone should know that we will be picking from 1-6. That narrows the players were lookig at to about 8-10. Of the players that we will likely be picking what are their odds of playing with the big club next season? 1. Mathews-100% 2. Laine-100% 3. Puljujarvi- 90% 4. Tkatchuk- 40% 5. Dubois- 25% 6. Nylander- 40% 7. Sergachev- 5% 8. Chyrchrun- 35% 9. Juolevi -25% Let me know what you guys think Fun post Goose. Matthews 100% Laine 100% Puljujarvi 100% Tkatchuk 100% Dubois 0% Nylander 0% Sergachev 50% Chyrchrun 100% Juolevi 0% Barring injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snizzle_ Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: Fun post Goose. Matthews 100% Laine 100% Puljujarvi 100% Tkatchuk 100% Dubois 0% Nylander 0% Sergachev 50% Chyrchrun 100% Juolevi 0% Barring injury. I agree with everything here except Tkatchuk. I really think he's overrated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 1 minute ago, junglesniper said: I agree with everything here except Tkatchuk. I really think he's overrated What do you think about the Leafs taking Tkatchuk, if they don't draft first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snizzle_ Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Just now, Alflives said: What do you think about the Leafs taking Tkatchuk, if they don't draft first? At what pick? And where do we pick in this scenario? Missing a lot of context Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 3 minutes ago, junglesniper said: At what pick? And where do we pick in this scenario? Missing a lot of context At any pick other than one. Marner was a surprise at 4, so maybe that London connection carries a lot of weight in their draft choices? Personally Alf would select a Finn at 2 and 3, but this is the Leafs. Maybe they even trade down to 4 to get Tkatchuk and collect another asset? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigs Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Just now, Alflives said: At any pick other than one. Marner was a surprise at 4, so maybe that London connection carries a lot of weight in their draft choices? Personally Alf would select a Finn at 2 and 3, but this is the Leafs. Maybe they even trade down to 4 to get Tkatchuk and collect another asset? If any GM who's picking in the top 3 trades down other than Edmonton (assuming they get a top 3 pick and the return is a SOLID defenseman) then they're retarded. The top 3 picks are so valuable with Matthews/the Finns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snizzle_ Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Alflives said: At any pick other than one. Marner was a surprise at 4, so maybe that London connection carries a lot of weight in their draft choices? Personally Alf would select a Finn at 2 and 3, but this is the Leafs. Maybe they even trade down to 4 to get Tkatchuk and collect another asset? It's obviously a possibility, but if the leafs have a chance at a Finn, i don't think they'll trade down. If they fall the 4, I could see them trading back a few spots to see if Tkatchuk falls, sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 27 minutes ago, Gooseberries said: Let me know what you guys think 1. Mathews-100% 2. Laine-90% 3. Puljujarvi- 90% 4. Tkatchuk- 50% 5. Dubois- 15% 6. Nylander- 25% 7. Sergachev- 7% 8. Chyrchrun- 37% 9. Juolevi -17% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 50/50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowardrobertford Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 All the picks 0% Nylander 101% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chickenman92 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 100%, They will rush whoever it is, even if they aren't ready. It's all about hype and selling a ticket or two, and fans love seeing the kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 15 minutes ago, Cowardrobertford said: All the picks 0% Nylander 101% That's a good one! Leafs pick him to play with his brother! then they go on Dancing with the Stars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aspie Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 100%. After showing they'd rather have guys like Virtanen and McCann play up than go back to to Junior it's hard to see our top 6 pick go down as well. It would be easier sending McCann to the AHL to play top 6 minutes and bring up our our new kid. Not to mention Matthew, Laine and Pul already know what it's like to play against men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 McLeod has climbed the rankings recently and could be in the mix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 52 minutes ago, Alflives said: At any pick other than one. Marner was a surprise at 4, so maybe that London connection carries a lot of weight in their draft choices? Personally Alf would select a Finn at 2 and 3, but this is the Leafs. Maybe they even trade down to 4 to get Tkatchuk and collect another asset? Marner wasn't a surprise pick. He was a consensus top 5 pick. Kid just put up back to back 2.0 ppg seasons and is tearing it up in the playoffs with 19 points in 8 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 I take it those "odds" are your opinion? The funny thing about the odds, it falls apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted April 11, 2016 Author Share Posted April 11, 2016 7 minutes ago, Heretic said: I take it those "odds" are your opinion? The funny thing about the odds, it falls apart. Yeah this is all opinion based obviously. None of us work for the canucks or own a time machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.