Down by the River Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Don't think Horvat gets anything out of being in London for another year. Give him a shot. Unlike Shinkaruk (who I like), I don't see Bo getting down about lack of offensive production if he is doing the little things right. I think he will be ready. Not basing this on yesterday's game, just a general opinion on how Horvat played last year and what I think he'll be able to do this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derp... Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Horvat excels with really sound hockey players, I hope he get's a look to play on the third line with the likes of a Higgins Burrows or Vey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 I really want to see Horvat make the team, he plays in the big games, Memorial Cup, World Juniors, Ivan Hlinka, U17s, he plays a good all-around game. If injuries hit we'll have Shinkaruk, Gaunce, Fox, Jensen all playing pro hockey along with Horvat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 (edited) Benning on Bo in his interview on TSN with Bob McKenzie: - Will have to beat a veteran out for a roster spot - Is a very good young player who's proven a lot at junior level already and worked hard over the summer - This weekend (Young Stars tournament) will give him a jump start so he'll be ready to go for main camp - Other centers (Bonino, Vey, Richardson, Matthias) can move to the wing When McKenzie asks if Bo will get a look on the wing like some of the centers suggested above: - Not likely - Wants to put Bo in a position where he can succeed and feels most comfortable at, and that's at center - Benning hasn't seen Bo play much on the wing so they are going to try him out at center Edited September 13, 2014 by Dasein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckledraggin Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 From the game last night, Bo is noticeable for being unnoticeable. He always makes the smart play, is never out of position and plays a rope-a-dope style, just waiting for the opposition to make a mistake. In the 4 on 3 overtime Green put him out. As complete a 2 way player as we have in our orginization. I was isolating on him a few times last night and he looked like he was just floating around, but he takes the game as it comes to him in the same way that Gaunce does. That style might make it hard for him to make the Canucks this year, because he doesn't go out of his way to be flashy and stand out. I hope he does make it though, because his game will translate to the NHL and even at a half a step faster he will still make the game look easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 From the game last night, Bo is noticeable for being unnoticeable. He always makes the smart play, is never out of position and plays a rope-a-dope style, just waiting for the opposition to make a mistake. In the 4 on 3 overtime Green put him out. As complete a 2 way player as we have in our orginization. I was isolating on him a few times last night and he looked like he was just floating around, but he takes the game as it comes to him in the same way that Gaunce does. That style might make it hard for him to make the Canucks this year, because he doesn't go out of his way to be flashy and stand out. I hope he does make it though, because his game will translate to the NHL and even at a half a step faster he will still make the game look easy. I think your overall assessment might be right in that he was never really out of position, but he didn't exactly make an impression on Green - this is indicative of what actually happened in OT rather than what you say happened in the bolded. To start the OT, Green put Jensen out even though he's a winger on the 4-on-3 - he lost the faceoff (obviously). I thought, 'Green must want to go with his pro player with experience to win this game.' So, I expected Horvat to jump over the board when Jensen went to change after a successful kill (so far) but then actually Gaunce came over. Then, when we had the chance to change again, Jensen came back out again. Horvat literally came on for maybe about the final 10 seconds, presumably for the shift after the PK. There was a stoppage of play shortly after the man-advantage was over, Horvat lost the ensuing faceoff in the defensive zone, and Edmonton scored. I kid you not. This is exactly what happened. You can check it again on the Canucks YouTube channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucklehd Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Tough game for Horvat, did a lot of things right, but wasn't dominant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckledraggin Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 I think your overall assessment might be right in that he was never really out of position, but he didn't exactly make an impression on Green - this is indicative of what actually happened in OT rather than what you say happened in the bolded. To start the OT, Green put Jensen out even though he's a winger on the 4-on-3 - he lost the faceoff (obviously). I thought, 'Green must want to go with his pro player with experience to win this game.' So, I expected Horvat to jump over the board when Jensen went to change after a successful kill (so far) but then actually Gaunce came over. Then, when we had the chance to change again, Jensen came back out again. Horvat literally came on for maybe about the final 10 seconds, presumably for the shift after the PK. There was a stoppage of play shortly after the man-advantage was over, Horvat lost the ensuing faceoff in the defensive zone, and Edmonton scored. I kid you not. This is exactly what happened. You can check it again on the Canucks YouTube channel. What happened in bold did actually happen and you are mistaken for calling me out on it. I was well aware that Jensen was the 1st out there, which really surprised me, and that Gaunce got some time on the PK. Again... Horvat just makes all the right plays and makes it look effortless in the same way that Gaunce does. For that reason I don't think he gets a sniff at the NHL this year even though he might earn it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 What happened in bold did actually happen and you are mistaken for calling me out on it. I was well aware that Jensen was the 1st out there, which really surprised me, and that Gaunce got some time on the PK. Again... Horvat just makes all the right plays and makes it look effortless in the same way that Gaunce does. For that reason I don't think he gets a sniff at the NHL this year even though he might earn it. Green went with Jensen twice and Gaunce once to give Jensen a breather before tapping Bo on the shoulder - that's not a guy you would say was sent out to kill the penalty. He came on for literally the final 10 seconds.. that hardly counts as Green putting him out there for the PK - that's like saying the Sedins killed the PK for Vigneault when he used to throw them out there for the final seconds of the PK so they can play the 5v5 shift after it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollieo Del Fuego Posted September 14, 2014 Share Posted September 14, 2014 Well anyway Horvat is now listed at 6'1'' and 216 ripped LBs. He will be fine as long as Jensen and Shinkaruk can remember how to take a pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jejejester Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 I for one haven't been disappointed in Horvat at all. He's been everything I expected at draft. He's a well sized center who is great in the dot and a nature for his age two way player. Excited to see him in pre season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Honestly, some people are too hard on Horvat. He plays a smart game and does all the little things right. I think for a player like him who plays such a structured game, games like these are difficult for him to play in. The players looked scrambly and disorganized for the most part. Which should be expected considering most of the guys have never played together and haven`t played in a few months. I expect a better showing when preseason starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derp... Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 He plays smarter than most guys, that's why he was paired with Reinhart and McDavid at the WJC. Very few players have played with a guy like Bo, they aren't ready for his passes sometimes, because they don't expect it yet. Fox is the one guy who is always ready for a pass and I like them on the same line. Bo is good at digging and making plays from the wall Fox is good and finding space to get shots off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 (edited) As a center capable of a bottom-6 role, I don't see why we'd have to send him down to junior. It's not like he'll learn anything new down there from dominating guys way younger and smaller than he is. I think he's ready for a 4th line role in the least here. Already more capable than a lot of our current roster, and he needs to start learning how to play against pros. Shifts shortened, speed increased. He simply won't get that in London. Another year in junior, followed by seasoning in the AHL will just slow down his development and increase the risk of him becoming a bust and/or unhappy here. Edited September 15, 2014 by TOMapleLaughs 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 (edited) Man all these people who think Bo is too good for junior... He's not. Get over yourselves. He can develop in junior this year and it wouldn't be the end of the world. And we don't know if he's capable of a bottom-6 role yet. It's not even main camp yet. Edited September 15, 2014 by Dasein 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollieo Del Fuego Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Man all these people who think Bo is too good for junior... He's not. Get over yourselves. He can develop in junior this year and it wouldn't be the end of the world. And we don't know if he's capable of a bottom-6 role yet. It's not even main camp yet. Sir Das; You might want to take your own advise and "get over yourself". If you can't see that he is better at just about everything then Hansen and as good as Richardson at FO's then your eyes are almost shut, sort of squinting sideways while telling yourself "that wasn't a good play". If he goes back to Junior he will be the anchor of team Canada and it's best player, he may not lead the scoring race but he will lead. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Guest Dasein Posted September 15, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted September 15, 2014 (edited) Sir Das; You might want to take your own advise and "get over yourself". If you can't see that he is better at just about everything then Hansen and as good as Richardson at FO's then your eyes are almost shut, sort of squinting sideways while telling yourself "that wasn't a good play". If he goes back to Junior he will be the anchor of team Canada and it's best player, he may not lead the scoring race but he will lead. Oh my goodness, where do you get this stuff from. Your dealer must sell some dank products. You can't seriously be judging from Horvat's play in a prospects tournament that he's already better than established NHLers without even having seen him play against men? Let me explain why that assertion is dead wrong. 1. Better at just about everything than Hansen? You mean the guy who averaged 0.57PPG just two years? Jannik Hansen is in his prime at age 28. Yes he had a bad year with only 20 points in 71 games, but literally everyone had a bad year - Henrik had only 50 for God's sake. Other than last season, he had 39 points in 82 games (0.475PPG) in 2012 and 27 points in 47 games in 2013 (lockout-shortened) which equate to 47 points in 82 games (0.57PPG). Even if he doesn't hit the 0.57PPG clip, it's not unreasonable to think he'd return to being almost 0.5PPG like two years prior with good coaching and more minutes on a team that rolls 4 lines. If you think Bo can do better than almost 0.5PPG in his 1st NHL season, you're are out of your mind. 2. As good as Richardson at FO's? You mean the guy who led the Canucks in FOs last year with 55.2%? http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats.htm?fetchKey=20142VANSASALL&sort=faceOffWinPctg&viewName=summary You reckon that Bo Horvat is going to have a better FO% than both Ryan Kesler and Henrik Sedin in his rookie season? I'm not blind - I just happen to have seen more things than you that makes me think otherwise. Sidenote 1: Hella funny to see that Bieksa is 100% on FOs after that Calgary game Sidenote 2: Alex Edler was 66.7%?! WTF that means he took at least 3 draws during the season 3. Saying Bo will be the best player for Team Canada in WJC is like saying Mike Richards was the best player on the 2005 WJC Team Canada just because he was the leader. Pure nonsense. Edited September 16, 2014 by Dasein 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 If you think the criticism against Horvat is high now just wait until Schneider wins the Vezina this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2SKATES1STICK Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I think your overall assessment might be right in that he was never really out of position, but he didn't exactly make an impression on Green - this is indicative of what actually happened in OT rather than what you say happened in the bolded. To start the OT, Green put Jensen out even though he's a winger on the 4-on-3 - he lost the faceoff (obviously). I thought, 'Green must want to go with his pro player with experience to win this game.' So, I expected Horvat to jump over the board when Jensen went to change after a successful kill (so far) but then actually Gaunce came over. Then, when we had the chance to change again, Jensen came back out again. Horvat literally came on for maybe about the final 10 seconds, presumably for the shift after the PK. There was a stoppage of play shortly after the man-advantage was over, Horvat lost the ensuing faceoff in the defensive zone, and Edmonton scored. I kid you not. This is exactly what happened. You can check it again on the Canucks YouTube channel. I'm actually not a fan of Green so far, I hope he can do something in Utica but I don't know, I'm not thrilled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 If you think the criticism against Horvat is high now just wait until Schneider wins the Vezina this year. It's okay Horvat has just as good a shot at the Calder as Schneider does at the Vezina. About 4-5 ahead of him would have to get injured and miss significant time for Schneider to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now