MikeyBoy44 Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Lol, isn't the phone the lesser? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 2 hours ago, Green Building said: Heard a blurb on the radio, something to the effect of "Nyquist goes insane for a couple seconds" and wondered what was being referenced. That play definitely fits the description. In no league anywhere is that less than an automatic match penalty. He should be well rested when he returns from a long suspension. In the NFL, if one player took his helmet off and swung it hitting another helmet less player in the face, I wonder what the suspension would be? I'm thinking half a season, or more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down by the River Posted February 13, 2017 Author Share Posted February 13, 2017 3 hours ago, canuck73_3 said: All slashes to the body and one high stick, I could make the same baseles claim that I could see Buurows doing what Nyquist did using your "evidence" compilation of Marchands. Also butthurt is applicable here as anytime the Bruins are mentioned half of cdc goes nuts with conspiracy bs. You said he isn't much of a stick swinger. I showed you otherwise. I can see why you'd use terms like butthurt instead of actually making arguments as to why you are right or wrong. And I'm not arguing that Marchand would do this (what Nyqvist did), just showing that your comment that he isn't much of a stick swinger isn't accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Just now, Down by the River said: You said he isn't much of a stick swinger. I showed you otherwise. I can see why you'd use terms like butthurt instead of actually making arguments as to why you are right or wrong. And I'm not arguing that Marchand would do this (what Nyqvist did), just showing that your comment that he isn't much of a stick swinger isn't accurate. I should have clarified I meant stick swinger in the 50's-70's sense of swinging at the face. My mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelownaCanucksFan Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 22 hours ago, MikeyBoy44 said: Lol, isn't the phone the lesser? Usually but not in this case, he was offered an in person hearing and declined, choosing to do it over the phone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelownaCanucksFan Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 On 2017-02-12 at 7:48 PM, Jägermeister said: 10+ without a doubt. I'd be okay with far longer. Absolutely disgusting play that has zero place in the game. I like(d) Nyquist as a player but he should be ashamed of himself and get himself ready for a long break. Anything less than 10 is unacceptable, should be 15 but DPS are the biggest idiots in NHL head office so who knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 It's confirmed. He got six games. http://www.tsn.ca/nyquist-suspended-six-games-for-high-stick-1.672956 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 6 minutes ago, goalie13 said: It's confirmed. He got six games. http://www.tsn.ca/nyquist-suspended-six-games-for-high-stick-1.672956 This actually confirms Player """Safety""" doesn't care. It was 5x worse than Keith's last year and it got the same amount of games like help me understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 That's it? 6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Light tap to a ref = automatic 10 Deliberate attempt to take a players eye out = 6 games Is there any organization that has their priorities more backwards than the absolute disgrace that is Player Safety? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 13 minutes ago, Pears said: Light tap to a ref = automatic 10 Deliberate attempt to take a players eye out = 6 games Is there any organization that has their priorities more backwards than the absolute disgrace that is Player Safety? That's the problem when they make it up as they go along. With the light tap to a ref, it's in a book. Like you said, it's automatic. What they need is a chart that shows the automatic suspension for 'intent to injure by spearing a guy in the face'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelownaCanucksFan Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 On 2017-02-14 at 3:15 PM, KelownaCanucksFan said: Anything less than 10 is unacceptable, should be 15 but DPS are the biggest idiots in NHL head office so who knows Called it, DPS really are idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, goalie13 said: That's the problem when they make it up as they go along. With the light tap to a ref, it's in a book. Like you said, it's automatic. What they need is a chart that shows the automatic suspension for 'intent to injure by spearing a guy in the face'. Yea and we all know if Edler or Burrows did that the NHL would have no problem suspending them for the rest of the season if they did that. Heck, they'd probably announce the suspension right after the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 On 2/13/2017 at 0:29 PM, canuck73_3 said: All slashes to the body and one high stick, I could make the same baseles claim that I could see Buurows doing what Nyquist did using your "evidence" compilation of Marchands. Also butthurt is applicable here as anytime the Bruins are mentioned half of cdc goes nuts with conspiracy bs. Actually it's anytime Marchand is mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 17 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Actually it's anytime Marchand is mentioned. Also true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 14 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Also true I don't think anyone has had any issue with Bergeron, Chara, McQuaid, or the like. Marchand is a special kind of scumbag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 4 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: I don't think anyone has had any issue with Bergeron, Chara, McQuaid, or the like. Marchand is a special kind of scumbag. Chara and McQuaid seem to take a lot of complaints around here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Just now, canuck73_3 said: Chara and McQuaid seem to take a lot of complaints around here It's been years since, at least as far as I can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 What a silly pro sports league the NHL is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.