Silky mitts Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Canucks underdogs on the money line , good bet to take boys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursel23 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 4-0 Canucks... Virtanen, Boeser, Daniel, Sutter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursel23 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 29 minutes ago, apollo said: People only rag on him and use him as a scapegoat because they are jealous he's better looking than them and makes millions and rocks at hockey. Can't wait to see Eddie back... who comes out? Pouliot or The Bulldog? Tanev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 14 minutes ago, tas said: don't think they'll have half of the healthy right side guys playing on the left. edler-biega del zotto-gudbranson hutton-pouliot almost certainly. Is that not an oxymoron? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustRich Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 15 hours ago, Green Building said: That's some next level s*&t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigturk8 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Is that not an oxymoron? Nah, it doesn't directly contradict itself. It just means that it is almost a certainty (very very likely). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Toe Drag Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Is that not an oxymoron? No. maybe certainly would though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 6 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Is that not an oxymoron? I'm nearly positive it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, Camel Toe Drag said: No. maybe certainly would though. That English be wouldn't though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 8 minutes ago, FilthyRich said: That's some next level s*&t The internet is a bounty of riches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 2 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Less passing to Boeser confirmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 2 hours ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Give me a god damn break... as soon as we get 1 guy back, we lose another... hope Biega and Pouliot sieze this opportunity to stay in the lineup. This is the work of the old boys club. I bet they mauled Tanev in his hotel room last night and beat him up mid sleep. DEATH TO THE OLD BOYS CLUB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 I think Millsy might have a few surprises in store for us tonight : ( 3-1 ducks....... but we smash Perry and send a message of Love to the Ducks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.DirtyDangles Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Just now, apollo said: Give me a god damn break... as soon as we get 1 guy back, we lose another... hope Biega and Pouliot sieze this opportunity to stay in the lineup. SUper choked right now man we need atleast 13 d lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 12 minutes ago, Bigturk8 said: Nah, it doesn't directly contradict itself. It just means that it is almost a certainty (very very likely). It wasn't almost a certainty. It was almost certainly. But I partially digress, that it may be completely possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasteofskin Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Go Canucks Go!! IM GUESSING ITS 4-2 FOR THE GOOD GUYS WITH AN EMPTY NETTER!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 13 minutes ago, Camel Toe Drag said: No. maybe certainly would though. Almost carries a tinge and possibility of uncertainty, therefore (or hence!) one cannot be almost certainly certain, merely possible in their notion of certainty. I'll be quiet now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigturk8 Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 1 minute ago, PhillipBlunt said: It wasn't almost a certainty. It was almost certainly. But I partially digress, that it may be completely possible. I know he said almost certainly. I'm saying that "almost certainly" means "almost a certainty". They are the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 13 minutes ago, Green Building said: I'm nearly positive it isn't. You...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 Just now, Bigturk8 said: I know he said almost certainly. I'm saying that "almost certainly" means "almost a certainty". They are the same thing. Certainly.....almost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.